Literature DB >> 27479542

Metabolic disorders and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case-control study in Italy.

Antonella Zucchetto1, Martina Taborelli1, Cristina Bosetti2, Maurizio Montella3, Carlo La Vecchia4, Gianni Franchin5, Massimo Libra6, Diego Serraino1, Jerry Polesel1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between metabolic disorders and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, considering different histological subtypes. Between 1992 and 2008, we carried out a multicentre case-control study in Italy. One-hundred and ninety-seven White patients with histologically confirmed nasopharyngeal carcinoma were enrolled as cases. The control group included 592 cancer-free patients, frequency matched by study centre, area of residence, sex, age and period of interview. Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), for nasopharyngeal carcinoma according to obesity and self-reported history of other metabolic disorders, were calculated through logistic regression models adjusted for matching variables and tobacco smoking and drinking habits. Obesity (OR=1.44; 95% CI: 0.88-2.36), diabetes mellitus (OR=0.91; 95% CI: 0.42-1.98), hypertension (OR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.48-1.32), hypercholesterolaemia (OR=1.41; 95% CI: 0.84-2.35) and metabolic syndrome (i.e. at least three among the four previously cited metabolic disorders; OR=1.11; 95% CI: 0.86-1.43) were not significantly associated with the overall risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the associations observed for diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia and metabolic syndrome were stronger among differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinomas than among undifferentiated ones. In particular, 21.7% of differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases and 7.8% of controls reported a history of metabolic syndrome (OR=3.37; 95% CI: 1.05-10.81). The results of the study indicated no overall association between metabolic disorders and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nonetheless, although the small sample size calls for caution in interpretation, metabolic disorders could increase the risk of differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This finding further supports a different aetiology of the two histological subtypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27479542     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  5 in total

1.  Impact of diabetes mellitus on the risk and survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gang Guo; Moushun Fu; Shuxiang Wei; Ruiwan Chen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  LncRNA ZNF667-AS1 Promotes ABLIM1 Expression by Adsorbing micro RNA-1290 to Suppress Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cell Progression.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Yaping Huang; Dianyu Shi; Chuan Nie; Yiping Luo; Liangfen Guo; Yu Zou; Chun Xie
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The effect of metabolic syndrome on head and neck cancer incidence risk: a population-based prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Huaili Jiang; Lei Zhou; Qiangsheng He; Kanglun Jiang; Jinqiu Yuan; Xinsheng Huang
Journal:  Cancer Metab       Date:  2021-06-03

4.  Prognostic Implication of Metabolic Syndrome in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Large Institution-Based Cohort Study from an Endemic Area.

Authors:  Shengyan Huang; Xirong Tan; Ping Feng; Sha Gong; Qingmei He; Xunhua Zhu; Na Liu; Yingqing Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Head and Neck Cancer Types and Risks of Cervical-Cranial Vascular Complications within 5 Years after Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Chi-Hung Liu; Bing-Shen Huang; Chien-Yu Lin; Chih-Hua Yeh; Tsong-Hai Lee; Hsiu-Chuan Wu; Chien-Hung Chang; Ting-Yu Chang; Kuo-Lun Huang; Jian-Lin Jiang; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Yeu-Jhy Chang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.