Literature DB >> 27479130

Intratumoral Genetic Heterogeneity in Rectal Cancer: Are Single Biopsies representative of the entirety of the tumor?

Fabiana Bettoni1, Cibele Masotti, Angelita Habr-Gama, Bruna R Correa, Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues, Maria R Vianna, Bruna B Vailati, Guilherme P São Julião, Laura M Fernandez, Pedro A Galante, Anamaria A Camargo, Rodrigo O Perez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Demonstrate intratumoral genetic heterogeneity in rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Several clinical management decisions in rectal cancer may be influenced by pretreatment biopsy information. However, in the setting of significant intratumoral heterogeneity, biopsies may not be representative of the entirety of the tumor and limit the reliability of the information provided from them for clinical decision management.
METHODS: Three fragments from a single rectal adenocarcinoma were chosen for whole-exome sequencing followed by mutation detection analysis. About 25 Gb of unambiguously mapped sequences were generated for each sample resulting in a median fold-coverage of 35x. Captured sequences mapped to the reference human genome were then used for the detection of somatic point mutations.
RESULTS: Overall, 193 unique somatic point mutations were identified. Only 53 (27%) of these were shared by all three fragments, including known genes involved in early phases of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence (such as, APC). Approximately, 115 (59%) mutations were exclusively present in only one of the fragments, including mutations in "driver" genes (DNAH12). Jaccard distances showed a median distance of 0.603 for pair-wise comparison of fragments indicating significant heterogeneity between them.
CONCLUSIONS: Considerable intratumoral heterogeneity is present among naive rectal cancers. The majority of point mutations detected in different fragments from rectal cancers are frequently unique to a single fragment. These findings support that gene mutations found on single pretreatment biopsies will not necessarily be representative of mutations present in the entirety of the tumor and therefore may limit the utility of the biological information provided by single biopsy fragments for clinical management decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27479130     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  20 in total

1.  Focusing the management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rachel Dbeis; Neil J Smart; Ian R Daniels
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Management of the Complete Clinical Response.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Guilherme Pagin São Julião; Bruna Borba Vailati; Ivana Castro; Debora Raffaele
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

3.  SSAT State-of-the-Art Conference: Advances in the Management of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Evie Carchman; Daniel I Chu; Gregory D Kennedy; Melanie Morris; Marc Dakermandji; John R T Monson; Laura Melina Fernandez; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Alessandro Fichera; Marco E Allaix; David Liska
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Multisite tumor sampling enhances the detection of intratumor heterogeneity at all different temporal stages of tumor evolution.

Authors:  Asier Erramuzpe; Jesús M Cortés; José I López
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology.

Authors:  Susana Olmedillas-López; Mariano García-Arranz; Damián García-Olmo
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 6.  Pathological Bases and Clinical Impact of Intratumor Heterogeneity in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  José I López; Javier C Angulo
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Pre-treatment carcinoembryonic antigen and outcome of patients with rectal cancer receiving neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation and surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colloca; Antonella Venturino; Pasquale Vitucci
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Microscopic intramural extension of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data.

Authors:  An-Sofie Verrijssen; José Guillem; Rodrigo Perez; Krzysztof Bujko; Nathalie Guedj; Angelita Habr-Gama; Ruud Houben; Danny Goudkade; Jarno Melenhorst; Jeroen Buijsen; Ben Vanneste; Heike I Grabsch; Murillo Bellezzo; Gabriel Paiva Fonseca; Frank Verhaegen; Maaike Berbee; Evert J Van Limbergen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Assessment of a Watch-and-Wait Strategy for Rectal Cancer in Patients With a Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  J Joshua Smith; Paul Strombom; Oliver S Chow; Campbell S Roxburgh; Patricio Lynn; Anne Eaton; Maria Widmar; Karuna Ganesh; Rona Yaeger; Andrea Cercek; Martin R Weiser; Garrett M Nash; Jose G Guillem; Larissa K F Temple; Sree B Chalasani; James L Fuqua; Iva Petkovska; Abraham J Wu; Marsha Reyngold; Efsevia Vakiani; Jinru Shia; Neil H Segal; James D Smith; Christopher Crane; Marc J Gollub; Mithat Gonen; Leonard B Saltz; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Philip B Paty
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Intra-Tumoral Genomic Heterogeneity in Rectal Cancer: Mutational Status Is Dependent on Preoperative Biopsy Depth and Location.

Authors:  Floris A Vuijk; Carlijn van de Water; Shannon Lent-van Vliet; Maxime J M van der Valk; Femke Simmer; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Iris D Nagtegaal; Denise E Hilling
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.