Literature DB >> 27478232

Effect of pre-cooking methods on the chemical and sensory deterioration of ready-to-eat chicken patties during chilled storage and microwave reheating.

Valquíria C S Ferreira1, David Morcuende2, Marta S Madruga1, Silvia H Hernández-López3, Fábio A P Silva1, Sonia Ventanas2, Mario Estévez2.   

Abstract

The effects of pre-cooking methods, namely, boiling (BL), roasting (RT) and grilling (GR), refrigerated storage (14 days/+4 °C) and microwave reheating on chicken patties were studied. Physical, chemical and sensory parameters were evaluated in order to correlate the chemical deterioration of ready-to-eat chicken patties with the acceptance of the odor. Chemical deterioration was evaluated through the chemical composition, Maillard compounds, Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and volatiles. Sensory deterioration (odor liking) was performed by an acceptance test with hedonic scale. According to the TBARS values and volatile compounds generated in the head space during the examined stages, the pre-cooking method and the storage time had a significant effect on lipid oxidation, whereas reheating in a microwave had a negligible impact. At each succeeding processing stage, panelists gave lower odor scores to all samples and no significant differences were found between treatments at any stage. RT and GR patties showed less intense chemical changes and presented higher acceptation scores by the sensory panel than BL patties. Thus, the choice of pre-cooking method and control of storage conditions plays a key role in the inhibition of oxidative changes in ready-to-eat chicken patties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convenience food; Lipid oxidation; Microwave reheating; Odor; Pre-cooking

Year:  2016        PMID: 27478232      PMCID: PMC4951429          DOI: 10.1007/s13197-016-2248-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci Technol        ISSN: 0022-1155            Impact factor:   2.701


  18 in total

Review 1.  Chromatographic analysis of minor constituents in vegetable oils.

Authors:  A Cert; W Moreda; M C Pérez-Camino
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2000-06-09       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  The impact of sensory quality of pork on consumer preference.

Authors:  Margit D Aaslyng; Marjatta Oksama; Eli V Olsen; Camilla Bejerholm; Maiken Baltzer; Grethe Andersen; Wender L P Bredie; Derek V Byrne; Gorm Gabrielsen
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Sensory and chemical analysis of cooked porcine meat patties in relation to warmed-over flavour and pre-slaughter stress.

Authors:  D V Byrne; W L Bredie; L S Bak; G Bertelsen; H Martens; M Martens
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  A comparison of warmed-over flavour in pork by sensory analysis, GC/MS and the electronic nose.

Authors:  M G O'Sullivan; D V Byrne; M T Jensen; H J Andersen; J Vestergaard
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Total antioxidant capacities of raw and cooked meats.

Authors:  Arda Serpen; Vural Gökmen; Vincenzo Fogliano
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Effect of different cooking methods on lipid oxidation and formation of volatile compounds in foal meat.

Authors:  Rubén Domínguez; María Gómez; Sonia Fonseca; José M Lorenzo
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Effect of different air/steam convection cooking methods on turkey breast meat: physical characterization, water status and sensory properties.

Authors:  B Mora; E Curti; E Vittadini; D Barbanti
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Effect of different temperature-time combinations on lipid and protein oxidation of sous-vide cooked lamb loins.

Authors:  Mar Roldan; Teresa Antequera; Monica Armenteros; Jorge Ruiz
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 7.514

9.  Advanced glycation end products, physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of cooked lamb loins affected by cooking method and addition of flavour precursors.

Authors:  Mar Roldan; Jürgen Loebner; Julia Degen; Thomas Henle; Teresa Antequera; Jorge Ruiz-Carrascal
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 7.514

10.  Analysis of volatiles in meat from Iberian pigs and lean pigs after refrigeration and cooking by using SPME-GC-MS.

Authors:  Mario Estévez; David Morcuende; Sonia Ventanas; Ramón Cava
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 5.279

View more
  5 in total

1.  Hawberry (Crataegus monogyna Jaqc.) extracts inhibit lipid oxidation and improve consumer liking of ready-to-eat (RTE) pork patties.

Authors:  T Akcan; M Estévez; S Rico; S Ventanas; D Morcuende
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Influence of Reheating Methods and Frozen Storage on Physicochemical Characteristics and Warmed-Over Flavor of Nutmeg Extract-Enriched Precooked Beef Meatballs.

Authors:  Rashida Parvin; Md Ashrafuzzaman Zahid; Jin-Kyu Seo; Junyoung Park; Jonghyun Ko; Han-Sul Yang
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-27

3.  Physicochemical Characteristics and Flavor-Related Compounds of Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Thigh Meats from Chickens.

Authors:  Farouq Heidar Barido; Hye-Jin Kim; Dong-Jin Shin; Ji-Seon Kwon; Hee-Jin Kim; Dongwook Kim; Hyo-Jun Choo; Ki-Chang Nam; Cheorun Jo; Jun-Heon Lee; Sung-Ki Lee; Aera Jang
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-09-27

4.  Effects of Shiitake (Lentinus edodes P.) Mushroom Powder and Sodium Tripolyphosphate on Texture and Flavor of Pork Patties.

Authors:  Soonsil Chun; Edgar Chambers; Delores H Chambers
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-05-10

5.  Shelf-Life Evaluation of Ingredient Combinations and Technologies for Use in Pet Food Formulations.

Authors:  Madison P Wagoner; Marc R Presume; Moses E Chilenje; Gerardo A Abascal-Ponciano; Jorge L Sandoval; Hunter R Smith; Tristan M Reyes; Barney S Wilborn; Justin A Dunavant; Robert P Mason; Eric K Altom; Charles W Starkey; Jason T Sawyer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.