Literature DB >> 27477714

An evaluation of 3D head pose estimation using the Microsoft Kinect v2.

John Darby1, María B Sánchez2, Penelope B Butler3, Ian D Loram2.   

Abstract

The Kinect v2 sensor supports real-time non-invasive 3D head pose estimation. Because the sensor is small, widely available and relatively cheap it has great potential as a tool for groups interested in measuring head posture. In this paper we compare the Kinect's head pose estimates with a marker-based record of ground truth in order to establish its accuracy. During movement of the head and neck alone (with static torso), we find average errors in absolute yaw, pitch and roll angles of 2.0±1.2°, 7.3±3.2° and 2.6±0.7°, and in rotations relative to the rest pose of 1.4±0.5°, 2.1±0.4° and 2.0±0.8°. Larger head rotations where it becomes difficult to see facial features can cause estimation to fail (10.2±6.1% of all poses in our static torso range of motion tests) but we found no significant changes in performance with the participant standing further away from Kinect - additionally enabling full-body pose estimation - or without performing face shape calibration, something which is not always possible for younger or disabled participants. Where facial features remain visible, the sensor has applications in the non-invasive assessment of postural control, e.g. during a programme of physical therapy. In particular, a multi-Kinect setup covering the full range of head (and body) movement would appear to be a promising way forward.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Head posture; Kinect v2; Non-invasive; Real-time

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27477714     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  6 in total

1.  Random forest-based classsification and analysis of hemiplegia gait using low-cost depth cameras.

Authors:  Guoliang Luo; Yean Zhu; Rui Wang; Yang Tong; Wei Lu; Haolun Wang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Non-invasive quantification of human swallowing using a simple motion tracking system.

Authors:  Hiroaki Hashimoto; Masayuki Hirata; Kazutaka Takahashi; Seiji Kameda; Yuri Katsuta; Fumiaki Yoshida; Noriaki Hattori; Takufumi Yanagisawa; Jason Palmer; Satoru Oshino; Toshiki Yoshimine; Haruhiko Kishima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Kinect V2 Performance Assessment in Daily-Life Gestures: Cohort Study on Healthy Subjects for a Reference Database for Automated Instrumental Evaluations on Neurological Patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Scano; Andrea Chiavenna; Matteo Malosio; Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 1.781

4.  Low-Cost Tracking Systems Allow Fine Biomechanical Evaluation of Upper-Limb Daily-Life Gestures in Healthy People and Post-Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Scano; Franco Molteni; Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Pilot feasibility study of a semi-automated three-dimensional scoring system for cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Takuto Nakamura; Satoko Sekimoto; Genko Oyama; Yasushi Shimo; Nobutaka Hattori; Hiroyuki Kajimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Hold that pose: capturing cervical dystonia's head deviation severity from video.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Elizabeth Cisneros; Ha Yeon Lee; Jeanne P Vu; Qiyu Chen; Casey N Benadof; Jacob Whitehill; Ryin Rouzbehani; Dominique T Sy; Jeannie S Huang; Terrence J Sejnowski; Joseph Jankovic; Stewart Factor; Christopher G Goetz; Richard L Barbano; Joel S Perlmutter; Hyder A Jinnah; Brian D Berman; Sarah Pirio Richardson; Glenn T Stebbins; Cynthia L Comella; David A Peterson
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.