INTRODUCTION: Public and private entities in the United States spend billions of dollars each year on potentially avoidable hospitalizations. This is a common occurrence in long-term care (LTC) facilities, especially in rural jurisdictions. This article details the creation of a telemedicine approach to assess residents from rural LTC facilities for potential transfer to hospitals. METHODS: An electronic LTC (eLTC) pilot was conducted in 20 pilot LTC facilities from 2012-2015. Each site underwent technologic assessment and upgrading to ensure that 2-way video communication was possible. A new central "hub" was staffed with advanced practice providers and registered nurses. Long-term care pilot sites were trained and rolled out over 3 years. This article reports development and implementation of the pilot, as well as descriptive statistics associated with provider assessments and averted transfers. RESULTS: Over 3 years, 736 eLTC consultations occurred in pilot sites. One-quarter of consultations occurred between 10 pm and 9 am. Overall, approximately 31% of cases were transferred. This decreased from 54% of cases in 2013 to 17% in 2015. Rural pilot facilities had an average of 23 eLTC consults per site per year. DISCUSSION: Averted transfers represent a dramatic benefit to the residents, as potentially avoidable hospitalizations cause undue stress and allow for nosocomial infections, among other risks. In addition, averting these unnecessary transfers likely saved the taxpayers of the United States over $5 million in admission-related charges to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (511 avoided transfers × $11,000 per average hospitalization from a LTC facility). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the eLTC pilot showed promise as a proof-of-concept. The pilot's implementation resulted in increasing utilization and promising reductions in unnecessary transfers to emergency departments and hospitalizations.
INTRODUCTION: Public and private entities in the United States spend billions of dollars each year on potentially avoidable hospitalizations. This is a common occurrence in long-term care (LTC) facilities, especially in rural jurisdictions. This article details the creation of a telemedicine approach to assess residents from rural LTC facilities for potential transfer to hospitals. METHODS: An electronic LTC (eLTC) pilot was conducted in 20 pilot LTC facilities from 2012-2015. Each site underwent technologic assessment and upgrading to ensure that 2-way video communication was possible. A new central "hub" was staffed with advanced practice providers and registered nurses. Long-term care pilot sites were trained and rolled out over 3 years. This article reports development and implementation of the pilot, as well as descriptive statistics associated with provider assessments and averted transfers. RESULTS: Over 3 years, 736 eLTC consultations occurred in pilot sites. One-quarter of consultations occurred between 10 pm and 9 am. Overall, approximately 31% of cases were transferred. This decreased from 54% of cases in 2013 to 17% in 2015. Rural pilot facilities had an average of 23 eLTC consults per site per year. DISCUSSION: Averted transfers represent a dramatic benefit to the residents, as potentially avoidable hospitalizations cause undue stress and allow for nosocomial infections, among other risks. In addition, averting these unnecessary transfers likely saved the taxpayers of the United States over $5 million in admission-related charges to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (511 avoided transfers × $11,000 per average hospitalization from a LTC facility). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the eLTC pilot showed promise as a proof-of-concept. The pilot's implementation resulted in increasing utilization and promising reductions in unnecessary transfers to emergency departments and hospitalizations.
Authors: James Alvin Low; Toh Hui Jin; Laurence Tan Lean Chin; Neha Agarwal; Goh Kim Huat; Adrian Yeow; Christina Soh Journal: Health Syst (Basingstoke) Date: 2019-03-21
Authors: Julia Driessen; Woody Chang; Palak Patel; Rollin M Wright; Kambria Ernst; Steven M Handler Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: John A Batsis; Peter R DiMilia; Lillian M Seo; Karen L Fortuna; Meaghan A Kennedy; Heather B Blunt; Pamela J Bagley; Jessica Brooks; Emma Brooks; Soo Yeon Kim; Rebecca K Masutani; Martha L Bruce; Stephen J Bartels Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Carlos Hernandez-Quiles; Máximo Bernabeu-Wittel; Maria Del Rocio Garcia-Serrano; Salvador Vergara-Lopez; Jose Antonio Perez-de-Leon; Alberto Ruiz-Cantero; Wilfredo Lopez-Jimeno; Manuel Quero-Haro; Eusebio Terceño-Rodriguez; Remedios Garcia-Jimenez; Bosco Baron-Franco; Manuel Ollero-Baturone Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2020-01-03
Authors: James H Ford; Sally A Jolles; Dee Heller; Madeline Langenstroer; Christopher Crnich Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 4.070
Authors: Zhifeng Cen; Junlei Li; Hao Hu; Ka Cheng Lei; Cheng I Loi; Zuanji Liang; Tek Fai Chan; Carolina Oi Lam Ung Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-09-29