Literature DB >> 27477350

Evaluation of the role of risk perception in stakeholder engagement to prevent lead exposure in an urban setting.

Melissa A Harclerode1, Pankaj Lal2, Neeraj Vedwan2, Bernabas Wolde2, Michael E Miller3.   

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is a vital sustainable remediation practice for obtaining useful feedback and identifying societal needs. Evaluating and integrating risk perception of stakeholders into remediation and outreach efforts allows for greater insight, increases the likelihood of success and ultimately, benefits the community by protecting its members from environmental hazards. In this study, we identified risk perception factors that influenced residents' level of concern for mitigating their exposure to elevated concentrations of lead in household paint and historic fill material. Risk perception factors were assessed by an in-person survey conducted in public green spaces. The analysis of survey participants' responses indicated that their perception of risk to exposed lead was mostly influenced by the presence of hazardous materials in close proximity to their residence, the ability to address pollution, and awareness, interest, and individual accountability in mitigating environmental risks. Responses also revealed that residents considered risk of lead and soil pollution as less menacing than the presence of more immediate and perceptible risks posed by factors such as air and water pollution. In addition, the community seemed to exhibit "optimism bias" and did not identify itself at high risk to susceptible and immediate hazards, including lead exposure. This lack of concern over lead exposure created a significant obstacle to community participation in state-led education and outreach programs. By integrating risk perception analysis and increasing stakeholder engagement, we can bring more attention to this issue, educate the public about the threat of lead pollution, and efficiently use financial resources to implement a more sustainable solution.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lead exposure; Optimism bias; Risk attenuation; Risk perception; Stakeholder engagement; Sustainable remediation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27477350     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  5 in total

1.  Comparative Optimism: Relative Risk Perception and Behavioral Response to Lead Exposure.

Authors:  Bernabas Wolde; Pankaj Lal; Melissa Harclerode; Alessandra Rossi
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  A Participatory-Based Research Approach for Assessing Exposure to Lead-Contaminated Drinking Water in the Houston Neighborhood of the Greater Fifth Ward.

Authors:  Leanne S Fawkes; Thomas J McDonald; Taehyun Roh; Weihsueh A Chiu; Robert J Taylor; Garett T Sansom
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Environmental health perceptions in a superfund community.

Authors:  Raja M Nagisetty; Daniel A Autenrieth; Sarah R Storey; William B Macgregor; Loran C Brooks
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Disaster Risk Resilience in Colima-Villa de Alvarez, Mexico: Application of the Resilience Index to Flash Flooding Events.

Authors:  Mendoza-Cano Oliver; López-de la Cruz Jesús; Pattison Ian; Martinez-Preciado Ma; Uribe-Ramos Juan Manuel; Edwards R M; Ramírez-Lomelí Cesar Ivan; Rincón-Avalos Pedro; Velazco-Cruz Jorge A
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-16       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Effects of Residential Environmental Screening and Perception Surveys on Superfund Environmental Health Risk Perceptions.

Authors:  Raja M Nagisetty; William B Macgregor; David Hutchins; Daniel A Autenrieth; Alyssa M Plant
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.