| Literature DB >> 27477167 |
Mary Gleeson1, Eliza A Hawkes2,3, David Cunningham1, Nick Chadwick4, Nicholas Counsell4, Anthony Lawrie4, Andrew Jack5, Paul Smith4, Paul Mouncey4, Christopher Pocock6, Kirit M Ardeshna7,8, John Radford9, Andrew McMillan10, John Davies11, Deborah Turner12, Anton Kruger13, Peter W M Johnson14, Joanna Gambell4, David Linch7.
Abstract
We performed a subgroup analysis of the phase III UK National Cancer Research Institute R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-21 (two- versus three-weekly rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) trial to evaluate the outcomes for 50 patients with World Health Organization 2008 classified primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma identified from the trial database. At a median follow-up of 7·2 years the 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival was 79·8% and 83·8%, respectively. An exploratory analysis raised the possibility of a better outcome in those who received R-CHOP-14 and time intensification may still, in the rituximab era, merit testing in a randomised trial in this subgroup of patients.Entities:
Keywords: clinical trials; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; non-Hodgkin lymphoma; primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma; rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27477167 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998