J Wasiak1, S J Lee2, E Paul3, A Shen4, H Tan4, H Cleland4, B Gabbe5. 1. Victorian Adult Burns Service, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: jason.wasiak@epworth.org.au. 2. Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Central Clinical School Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Clinical Haematology Department, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia. 4. Victorian Adult Burns Service, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although gender differences in morbidity and mortality have been measured in patients with moderate to severe burn injury, little attention has been directed at gender effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following burn injury. The current study was therefore conducted to prospectively measure changes in HRQoL for males and females in a sample of burn patients. METHODS: A total of 114 adults who received treatment at a statewide burns service for a sustained burns injury participated in this study. Instruments measuring generic health status (Short Form 36 Medical Outcomes Survey version 2), burn-specific HRQoL (Burns Specific Health Scale-Brief), psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale) and alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Tool) were prospectively measured at 3, 6 and 12 months post-burn. RESULTS: In the 12 months post-injury, female patients showed overall poorer physical (p=0.01) and mental health status (p<0.001), greater psychological distress (p<0.001), and greater difficulty with aspects of burn-specific HRQoL: body image (p<0.001), affect (p<0.001), interpersonal functioning (p=0.005), heat sensitivity (p=0.01) and treatment regime (p=0.01). While significant interaction effects suggested that female patients had more improvement in difficulties with treatment regime (p=0.007), female patients continued to report greater difficulty with multiple aspects of physical and psychosocial health status 12 months post-injury. CONCLUSION: Even though demographic variables, injury characteristics and burn care interventions were similar across genders, following burn injury female patients reported greater impairments in generic and burn-specific HRQoL along with psychological morbidity, when compared to male patients. Urgent clinical and research attention utilising an evidence-based research framework, which incorporates the use of larger sample sizes, the use of validated instruments to measure appropriate outcomes, and a commitment to monitoring long-term care, can only improve burn-care.
INTRODUCTION: Although gender differences in morbidity and mortality have been measured in patients with moderate to severe burn injury, little attention has been directed at gender effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following burn injury. The current study was therefore conducted to prospectively measure changes in HRQoL for males and females in a sample of burn patients. METHODS: A total of 114 adults who received treatment at a statewide burns service for a sustained burns injury participated in this study. Instruments measuring generic health status (Short Form 36 Medical Outcomes Survey version 2), burn-specific HRQoL (Burns Specific Health Scale-Brief), psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale) and alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Tool) were prospectively measured at 3, 6 and 12 months post-burn. RESULTS: In the 12 months post-injury, female patients showed overall poorer physical (p=0.01) and mental health status (p<0.001), greater psychological distress (p<0.001), and greater difficulty with aspects of burn-specific HRQoL: body image (p<0.001), affect (p<0.001), interpersonal functioning (p=0.005), heat sensitivity (p=0.01) and treatment regime (p=0.01). While significant interaction effects suggested that female patients had more improvement in difficulties with treatment regime (p=0.007), female patients continued to report greater difficulty with multiple aspects of physical and psychosocial health status 12 months post-injury. CONCLUSION: Even though demographic variables, injury characteristics and burn care interventions were similar across genders, following burn injury female patients reported greater impairments in generic and burn-specific HRQoL along with psychological morbidity, when compared to male patients. Urgent clinical and research attention utilising an evidence-based research framework, which incorporates the use of larger sample sizes, the use of validated instruments to measure appropriate outcomes, and a commitment to monitoring long-term care, can only improve burn-care.
Authors: Felicia N Williams; Paula D Strassle; Laquanda Knowlin; Sonia Napravnik; David van Duin; Anthony Charles; Rabia Nizamani; Samuel W Jones; Bruce A Cairns Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Marc G Jeschke; Margriet E van Baar; Mashkoor A Choudhry; Kevin K Chung; Nicole S Gibran; Sarvesh Logsetty Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Inge Spronk; Nancy E E Van Loey; Charlie Sewalt; Daan Nieboer; Babette Renneberg; Asgjerd Litleré Moi; Caisa Oster; Lotti Orwelius; Margriet E van Baar; Suzanne Polinder Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Inge Spronk; Catherine M Legemate; Jan Dokter; Nancy E E van Loey; Margriet E van Baar; Suzanne Polinder Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Elise Boersma-van Dam; Rens van de Schoot; Helma W C Hofland; Iris M Engelhard; Nancy E E Van Loey Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 4.147