Literature DB >> 27476871

Writing peer-reviewed articles with diverse teams: considerations for novice scholars conducting community-engaged research.

Sarah Flicker1, Stephanie A Nixon2.   

Abstract

Given the growth of interdisciplinary and community-engaged health promotion research, it has become increasingly common to conduct studies in diverse teams. While there is literature to guide collaborative research proposal development, data collection and analysis, little has been written about writing peer-reviewed publications collaboratively in teams. This gap is particularly important for junior researchers who lead articles involving diverse and community-engaged co-authors. The purpose of this article is to present a series of considerations to guide novice researchers in writing for peer-reviewed publication with diverse teams. The following considerations are addressed: justifying the value of peer-reviewed publication with non-academic partners; establishing co-author roles that respect expertise and interest; clarifying the message and audience; using the article outline as a form of engagement; knowledge translation within and beyond the academy; and multiple strategies for generating and reviewing drafts. Community-engaged research often involves collaboration with communities that have long suffered a history of colonial and extractive research practices. Authentic engagement of these partners can be supported through research practices, including manuscript development, that are transparent and that honour the voices of all team members. Ensuring meaningful participation and diverse perspectives is key to transforming research relationships and sharing new insights into seemingly intractable health problems.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  action research; collaboration; community-based participatory research; knowledge transfer; methodology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27476871      PMCID: PMC5914387          DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daw059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  12 in total

1.  Applying the principles of knowledge translation and exchange to inform dissemination of HIV survey results to adolescent participants in South Africa.

Authors:  Stephanie A Nixon; Marisa Casale; Sarah Flicker; Michael Rogan
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.483

2.  Researchers' perspectives on collective/community co-authorship in community-based participatory indigenous research.

Authors:  Heather Castleden; Vanessa Sloan Morgan; Aelita Neimanis
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Community-based research partnerships: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Meredith Minkler
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 4.  The role and theoretical evolution of knowledge translation and exchange in public health.

Authors:  Rebecca Armstrong; Elizabeth Waters; Helen Roberts; Sandy Oliver; Jennie Popay
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 2.341

5.  A snapshot of community-based research in Canada: Who? What? Why? How?

Authors:  Sarah Flicker; Beth Savan; Brian Kolenda; Matto Mildenberger
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2007-02-25

6.  Fieldwork challenges: lessons learned from a north-south public health research partnership.

Authors:  Marisa A J Casale; Sarah Flicker; Stephanie A Nixon
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2011-03-21

7.  Opportunities, ethical challenges, and lessons learned from working with peer research assistants in a multi-method HIV community-based research study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Carmen Logie; Llana James; Wangari Tharao; Mona R Loutfy
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Modifying Photovoice for community-based participatory Indigenous research.

Authors:  Heather Castleden; Theresa Garvin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The DEPICT model for participatory qualitative health promotion research analysis piloted in Canada, Zambia and South Africa.

Authors:  Sarah Flicker; Stephanie A Nixon
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 2.483

10.  Governing through community allegiance: a qualitative examination of peer research in community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Adrian Guta; Sarah Flicker; Brenda Roche
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2013-01-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Visualizing DEPICT: A Multistep Model for Participatory Analysis in Photovoice Research for Social Change.

Authors:  Sarah Switzer; Sarah Flicker
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2021-10-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.