Literature DB >> 27476828

Ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical block versus superficial cervical block for carotid artery endarterectomy: The randomized-controlled CERVECHO trial.

Arslane Alilet1, Pascal Petit2, Benedicte Devaux3, Corinne Joly4, Emmanuel Samain5, Sebastien Pili-Floury6, Guillaume Besch7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The value of ultrasound guidance for intermediate cervical blocks in patients undergoing carotid artery endarterectomy is poorly described. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy of ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical block to superficial cervical block for carotid artery endarterectomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-centre randomized-controlled study in a French University Hospital, from April 2011 to March 2012. The anaesthesia technique was randomly allocated to patients scheduled for carotid artery endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia (ropivacaine 4.75mg/mL): superficial cervical block in the Control group, and ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical block in the Echo group. The main outcome measure was the percentage of surgery performed without supplemental topical anaesthesia. The secondary outcomes were: rate of conversion to general anaesthesia, amount of supplemental topical lidocaine and block-related complications. P<0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Demographic data for the 86 patients included [mean (SD) age 73 (11) years] did not differ between groups. Surgery was performed without supplemental topical lidocaine in 23% and 7% of the patients in the Echo and Control groups, respectively (P=0.068). Conversion to general anaesthesia for inadequate analgesia was needed in 0 and 2 patients in the Echo and Control groups, respectively. The mean dose of topical lidocaine was not different between groups. No complication directly related to a cervical block was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block and superficial cervical blocks performed for carotid artery surgery seems to provide similar results, but this study was probably underpowered to detect any difference. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (Eudra-CT) registration number: 2010-A 01490-39.
Copyright © 2016 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesia; Carotids/carotid surgery; Regional anaesthesia; Ultrasound techniques

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27476828     DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med        ISSN: 2352-5568            Impact factor:   4.132


  6 in total

Review 1.  Understanding fascial anatomy and interfascial communication: implications in regional anesthesia.

Authors:  Peiqi Shao; Huili Li; Rong Shi; Jinlei Li; Yun Wang
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Ultrasound-Guided Combined Interscalene-Cervical Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia in Clavicular Fractures: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Onur Balaban; Turan Cihan Dülgeroğlu; Tayfun Aydın
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-06-03

Review 3.  General versus local anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: Special considerations.

Authors:  Nikolaos Patelis; Maria Diakomi; Anastasios Maskanakis; Konstantinos Maltezos; Dimitrios Schizas; Marianna Papaioannou
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

4.  Effects of regional anesthesia techniques on local anesthetic plasma levels and complications in carotid surgery: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Thomas Rössel; Christopher Uhlig; Jörg Pietsch; Stefan Ludwig; Thea Koch; Torsten Richter; Peter Markus Spieth; Stephan Kersting
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Cervical plexus block.

Authors:  Jin-Soo Kim; Justin Sangwook Ko; Seunguk Bang; Hyungtae Kim; Sook Young Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-04

6.  [Cervical plexus block as an alternative anesthetic approach for type I thyroplasty: a case report].

Authors:  Antoine Abi Lutfallah; Khalil Jabbour; Afrida Gergess; Gemma Hayeck; Nayla Matar; Samia Madi-Jebara
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-09-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.