Literature DB >> 27476598

Extreme Inverted Trophic Pyramid of Reef Sharks Supported by Spawning Groupers.

Johann Mourier1, Jeffrey Maynard2, Valeriano Parravicini3, Laurent Ballesta4, Eric Clua3, Michael L Domeier5, Serge Planes6.   

Abstract

The extent of the global human footprint [1] limits our understanding of what is natural in the marine environment. Remote, near-pristine areas provide some baseline expectations for biomass [2, 3] and suggest that predators dominate, producing an inverted biomass pyramid. The southern pass of Fakarava atoll-a biosphere reserve in French Polynesia-hosts an average of 600 reef sharks, two to three times the biomass per hectare documented for any other reef shark aggregations [4]. This huge biomass of predators makes the trophic pyramid inverted. Bioenergetics models indicate that the sharks require ∼90 tons of fish per year, whereas the total fish production in the pass is ∼17 tons per year. Energetic theory shows that such trophic structure is maintained through subsidies [5-9], and empirical evidence suggests that sharks must engage in wide-ranging foraging excursions to meet energy needs [9, 10]. We used underwater surveys and acoustic telemetry to assess shark residency in the pass and feeding behavior and used bioenergetics models to understand energy flow. Contrary to previous findings, our results highlight that sharks may overcome low local energy availability by feeding on fish spawning aggregations, which concentrate energy from other local trophic pyramids. Fish spawning aggregations are known to be targeted by sharks, but they were previously believed to play a minor role representing occasional opportunistic supplements. This research demonstrates that fish spawning aggregations can play a significant role in the maintenance of local inverted pyramids in pristine marine areas. Conservation of fish spawning aggregations can help conserve shark populations, especially if combined with shark fishing bans.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27476598     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  19 in total

1.  Genetic structure and signatures of selection in grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos).

Authors:  P Momigliano; R Harcourt; W D Robbins; V Jaiteh; G N Mahardika; A Sembiring; A Stow
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Seabird diversity and biomass enhance cross-ecosystem nutrient subsidies.

Authors:  Cassandra E Benkwitt; Peter Carr; Shaun K Wilson; Nicholas A J Graham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Emerging insights on effects of sharks and other top predators on coral reefs.

Authors:  Stuart A Sandin; Beverly J French; Brian J Zgliczynski
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2022-03-14

4.  Diet and condition of mesopredators on coral reefs in relation to shark abundance.

Authors:  Shanta C Barley; Mark G Meekan; Jessica J Meeuwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Resetting predator baselines in coral reef ecosystems.

Authors:  Darcy Bradley; Eric Conklin; Yannis P Papastamatiou; Douglas J McCauley; Kydd Pollock; Amanda Pollock; Bruce E Kendall; Steven D Gaines; Jennifer E Caselle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A unifying theory for top-heavy ecosystem structure in the ocean.

Authors:  C Brock Woodson; John R Schramski; Samantha B Joye
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Dynamics of predator-prey habitat use and behavioral interactions over diel periods at sub-tropical reefs.

Authors:  Fabio Campanella; Peter J Auster; J Christopher Taylor; Roldan C Muñoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Recent expansion of marine protected areas matches with home range of grey reef sharks.

Authors:  Lucas Bonnin; David Mouillot; Germain Boussarie; William D Robbins; Jeremy J Kiszka; Laurent Dagorn; Laurent Vigliola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The utility of bioenergetics modelling in quantifying predation rates of marine apex predators: Ecological and fisheries implications.

Authors:  A Barnett; M Braccini; C L Dudgeon; N L Payne; K G Abrantes; M Sheaves; E P Snelling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Activity seascapes highlight central place foraging strategies in marine predators that never stop swimming.

Authors:  Yannis P Papastamatiou; Yuuki Y Watanabe; Urška Demšar; Vianey Leos-Barajas; Darcy Bradley; Roland Langrock; Kevin Weng; Christopher G Lowe; Alan M Friedlander; Jennifer E Caselle
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.