| Literature DB >> 27476444 |
Marleen M Janus1,2, Wim Crielaard1,2, Egija Zaura1,2, Bart J Keijser1,2,3, Bernd W Brandt1,2, Bastiaan P Krom1,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Dental caries is caused by prolonged episodes of low pH due to acid production by oral biofilms. Bacteria within such biofilms communicate via quorum sensing (QS). QS regulates several phenotypic biofilm parameters, such as biofilm formation and the production of virulence factors. In this study, we evaluated the effect of several QS modifiers on growth and the cariogenic potential of microcosm oral biofilms.Entities:
Keywords: 3-oxo-N-(2-oxocyclohexyl)dodecanamide; In vitro biofilms; caries; dental plaque; healthy ecology; quorum sensing
Year: 2016 PMID: 27476444 PMCID: PMC4967710 DOI: 10.3402/jom.v8.32513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Microbiol ISSN: 2000-2297 Impact factor: 5.474
Compounds tested in an in vitro oral plaque biofilm model
| Compound | Concentration (µM) | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Oxo-N | 3-Oxo- | 0.01–100 |
( |
| 3,4-Dibromo | 3,4-Dibromo-2(5 | 10 | |
| Furanone C30 | ( | 10 |
( |
| C12-HSL |
| 10–100 |
( |
| DPD | ( | 10 |
Fig. 1Total biofilm formation and total lactic acid accumulation for biofilms grown in the presence of different quorum sensing (QS) inhibitors or precursors. a) Biofilm formation expressed as CFU per biofilm. b) Lactic acid accumulation in mM per biofilm after 3 h incubation in BPW containing 0.2% sucrose. For both panels, white bars represent 48-h biofilms; black bars represent 96-h biofilms. Statistical significance compared to the control is shown (*P<0.05, *P<0.01, ***P<0.001).
Fig. 2Dose response of 3-Oxo-N and competition between 3-Oxo-N and C12-HSL. a) Total biofilm formation and total lactic acid accumulation for biofilms grown in the presence of different concentrations of 3-oxo-N-(2-oxocyclohexyl)dodecanamide. White bars: biofilm formation expressed as CFU/biofilm; black bars: lactic acid accumulation expressed in mM per biofilm after 3-h incubation in BPW containing 0.2% sucrose. Statistical significance compared to the control is shown (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). b) Total lactic acid accumulation for biofilms grown in presence of different concentrations 3-Oxo-N and C12-HSL, in mM per biofilm after 3-h incubation in BPW containing 0.2% sucrose. White bars: 0 µM C12-HSL; gray bars: 25 µM C12-HSL; black bars: 100 µM C12-HSL. All concentrations of 3-oxo-N-(2-oxocyclyhexyl)dodecanamide resulted in a statistical significant difference compared to the control.
Fig. 3Principal component analysis plot of a) all biofilms, b) 48-h biofilms, and c) 96-h biofilms, where ● are the 48-h biofilms grown in presence of 3-Oxo-N, ○ are the 48-h control biofilms, ■ are the 96-h biofilms grown in presence of 3-Oxo-N, □ and are the 96-h control biofilms. The data were randomly subsampled and log2-transformed.
Fig. 4Relative abundance of the top 15 most abundant genera (remaining genera are grouped as ‘other’) in: a) 48-h control biofilms, b) 48-h biofilms grown in presence of 3-Oxo-N, c) 96-h control biofilms, d) 96-h biofilms grown in presence of 3-Oxo-N and e) saliva inoculum.