Literature DB >> 27476360

Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion.

Nitika Monga1, Om Prakash Kharbanda2, Vilas Samrit3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study provides vital insight in assessing anchorage loss when miniscrews are indirectly loaded.
METHODS: The study sample comprised 18 patients with bimaxillary protrusion (14 girls, 4 boys; mean age, 17.3 ± 4.6 years) selected from a database of 89 patients treated with miniscrews. All subjects who were selected required extraction of all first premolars and maximum anchorage. After initial leveling and aligning, miniscrews were placed between the first molar and the second premolar in all 4 quadrants and loaded by the indirect method at 3 weeks after placement with 200-g nickel-titanium alloy closed-coil springs for en-masse retraction. Mean treatment duration was 29.7 ± 6.8 months. Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were analyzed to measure the amount of anchorage loss, incisor retraction, and the incisors' angular change in reference to the pterygoid vertical reference line and were evaluated by the structural superimposition method.
RESULTS: The ratio of incisor retraction to molar protraction was 4.2 in the maxilla and 4.7 in the mandible. The first molars showed mean extrusion of 0.20 mm in the maxilla and 0.57 mm in the mandible; these were statistically insignificant. The mean angular change of the first molars was -2.43° in the maxilla and -0.03° in the mandible. The mean anchorage loss in reference to the pterygoid vertical was 1.3 mm in the maxilla and 1.1 mm in the mandible; these were statistically significant. Structural superimpositions showed mean change in molar position of 0.83 mm in the maxilla and 0.87 mm in the mandible, and 5.77 mm in the maxillary incisor and 5.43 mm in the mandibular incisor. These results were compared with the direct anchorage method reported in the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: Indirect miniscrew anchorage can be a viable alternative to direct anchorage.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27476360     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  In Vivo Comparison of the Efficiency of En-Masse Retraction Using Temporary Anchorage Devices With and Without Orthodontic Appliances on the Posterior Teeth.

Authors:  Sanjam Oswal; Sonali V Deshmukh; Sanket S Agarkar; Sachin Durkar; Chaitra Mastud; Jayesh S Rahalkar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

Review 2.  Soft tissue changes with skeletal anchorage in comparison to conventional anchorage protocols in the treatment of bimaxillary proclination patients treated with premolar extraction : A systematic review.

Authors:  Kumeran Mohan; Saritha Sivarajan; May Nak Lau; Siti Adibah Othman; Mona M Salah Fayed
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  SURGICAL AND ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT METHODS IN PATIENTS WITH BIMAXILLARY PROTRUSION - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Authors:  O K Ogundipe; O D Otuyemi
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

4.  Anchorage control using miniscrews in comparison to Essix appliance in treatment of postpubertal patients with Class II malocclusion using Carrière Motion Appliance.

Authors:  Ahmed S Fouda; Khaled H Attia; Amr M Abouelezz; Mohamed Abd El-Ghafour; Mai H Aboulfotouh
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 5.  Efficacy of orthodontic mini implants for en masse retraction in the maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kathrin Becker; Annika Pliska; Caroline Busch; Benedict Wilmes; Michael Wolf; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-10-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.