Literature DB >> 27475523

Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy in gynecologic oncology: A systematic review of the literature.

Samar Nahas1, Tomer Feigenberg2, Susan Park3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare same-day discharge (SDD) versus traditional admission to the hospital following minimally invasive hysterectomy (conventional laparoscopy and robotic assisted laparoscopy) for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in which MEDLINE and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were searched using terms related to same-day discharge, outpatient, and hysterectomy. We reviewed published English language trials and studies that compared safety, feasibility, readmission rate, emergency department (ED) visits, complication rate, and associated risk factors for admission. Studies of any design that included at least 20 patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy (conventional laparoscopy and robotic laparoscopy) for gynecologic oncology indications were included.
RESULTS: The literature review yielded 421 citations, of which 27 full-text articles were reviewed. Six comparative studies met eligibility criteria. Study data were abstracted and inputted into structural electronic forms.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in comparison to admission post minimally invasive hysterectomy with or without full staging, SDD in gynecologic oncology procedures is safe, and feasible. It is associated with low complication and readmissions rates, few visits, and low rates of unscheduled visits within the follow up period of two to six weeks after surgery.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecologic malignancy outpatient; Gynecologic oncology; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopic; Minimal invasive staging; Robotic; Same-day discharge

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27475523     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  5 in total

Review 1.  Society of gynecologic oncology future of physician payment reform task force: Lessons learned in developing and implementing surgical alternative payment models.

Authors:  Margaret I Liang; Emeline M Aviki; Jason D Wright; Laura J Havrilesky; Leslie R Boyd; Haley A Moss; Elizabeth L Jewell; David E Cohn; Sachin M Apte; Patrick F Timmins; Ronald D Alvarez; Jill Rathbun; Elizabeth Lipinski; Susan White; Dorimar Siverio-Minardi; Emily M Ko
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Rebi Nahum Halloway; Jennifer Heim; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Colleen Rivard
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Readmissions and perioperative outcomes for same-day versus next-day discharge after prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Robison; Pamela E Smith; Lopa K Pandya; Silpa Nekkanti; Andrew F Hundley; Catherine O Hudson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Pedagogic Approach in the Surgical Learning: The First Period of "Assistant Surgeon" May Improve the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Angeline Favre; Stephanie Huberlant; Marie Carbonnel; Julie Goetgheluck; Aurelie Revaux; Jean Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-11-02

5.  Qualitative Interview Study of Gynecologic Oncologist Utilization of Recommended Same-Day Discharge Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Sophia Bunde; Shalkar Adambekov; Ella Glikson; Faina Linkov
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.