Literature DB >> 27474497

Sutureless closure of colonic defects with tissue adhesives: an in vivo study in the rat.

Konstantinos A Vakalopoulos1, Zhouqiao Wu2, Leonard F Kroese2, Johannes Jeekel3, Gert-Jan Kleinrensink3, Dimitra Dodou4, King H Lam5, Johan F Lange2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tissue adhesives (TAs) in gastrointestinal surgery are gradually gaining acceptance. Before implementation as colonic sealants, an evaluation of the sealing capability of a TA when in contact with fecal matter, as in a leaking anastomosis, is needed. In this study, we used clinically available TAs for the sutureless closure of colonic defects evaluating mechanical strength and tissue healing.
METHODS: A total of 160 rats were divided into 8 groups. Two .5-cm incisions were created, one in the proximal and another in the distal colon. Incisions were sealed with a TA: Histoacryl Flex, Bioglue, Dermabond, Tissucol, Duraseal Xact, gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde or Glubran 2. A control group was included in which the colonic defects were not sealed. Follow-up time was 3 or 10 days. Clinical complication rate, bursting pressure, and histopathologic analysis was included.
RESULTS: Leakage rates in the TA groups were highest for Duraseal Xact, Bioglue, and gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde at 3 and 10 days. The cyanoacrylates Glubran 2, Histoacryl Flex, and Omnex, and the fibrin glue Tissucol showed the lowest overall clinical complication rates while maintaining the highest bursting pressure at day 10. Histoacryl Flex exhibited significantly higher collagen formation at day 10 than the other TAs.
CONCLUSIONS: This experimental model evaluates the protective effect of a TA seal on a leaking colonic defect. We found large differences in leakage rates and inertness of the tested TAs. The cyanoacrylates Histoacryl Flex, Omnex, and Glubran 2 as well as the fibrin glue Tissucol demonstrated the lowest leakage rates and the most inert histopathologic profile while maintaining high mechanical strength.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal; Glue; New techniques; Sealing; Surgery; Tissue adhesive

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27474497     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  4 in total

Review 1.  The potential effect of biological sealants on colorectal anastomosis healing in experimental research involving severe diabetes.

Authors:  K Stergios; K Kontzoglou; V Pergialiotis; L M Korou; M Frountzas; O Lalude; N Nikiteas; D N Perrea
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Impact of tissue adhesives on the prevention of anastomotic leakage of colonic anastomoses: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Vakalopoulos; Joanna W A M Bosmans; Kevin W Y van Barneveld; Ruben R M Vogels; Geesien S A Boersema; Zhouqiao Wu; Marion J J Gijbels; Johannes Jeekel; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Nicole D Bouvy; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The safety and efficacy of Glubran 2 as biliostatic agent in liver resection.

Authors:  Renato Patrone; Vincenza Granata; Andrea Belli; Raffaele Palaia; Vittorio Albino; Mauro Piccirillo; Roberta Fusco; Fabiana Tatangelo; Guglielmo Nasti; Antonio Avallone; Francesco Izzo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.965

4.  Effects of albumin/glutaraldehyde glue on healing of colonic anastomosis in rats.

Authors:  Kalliopi Despoudi; Ioannis Mantzoros; Orestis Ioannidis; Aggeliki Cheva; Nikolaos Antoniou; Dimitrios Konstantaras; Savvas Symeonidis; Manousos George Pramateftakis; Efstathios Kotidis; Stamatis Angelopoulos; Konstantinos Tsalis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.