Literature DB >> 27474079

Size mismatch in liver transplantation.

Kyota Fukazawa1, Seigo Nishida2.   

Abstract

Size mismatch is an unique and inevitable but critical issue in live donor liver transplantation. Unmatched metabolic demand of recipient as well as physiologic mismatch aggravates the damage to liver graft, inevitably leading to graft failure on recipient. Also, an excessive resection of liver graft for better recipient outcome in live donor liver transplant may jeopardize the healthy donor well-being and even put donor life in danger. There is a fine balance between resected graft volume required to meet the recipient's metabolic demand and residual graft volume required for donor safety. The obvious clinical necessity of finding that balance has prompted a clinical need and promoted the improvement of knowledge and development of management strategies for size-mismatched transplants. The development of the size-matching methodology has significantly improved graft outcome and recipient survival in live donor liver transplants. On the other hand, the effect of size mismatch in cadaveric transplants has never been observed as being so pronounced. The importance of matching of the donor recipient size has been unrecognized in cadaveric liver transplant. In this review, we attempt to summarize the current most updated knowledge on the subject, particularly addressing the definition and complications of size-mismatched cadaveric liver transplant, as well as management strategies.
© 2016 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Graft outcome; Graft weight-to-recipient body weight ratio; Large for size; Size mismatch; Small-for-size; Standard liver volume

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27474079     DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  4 in total

1.  Deceased-Donor Liver Size and the Sex-Based Disparity in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Mary G Bowring; Jessica M Ruck; Christine E Haugen; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Hippo Signaling in the Liver Regulates Organ Size, Cell Fate, and Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sachin H Patel; Fernando D Camargo; Dean Yimlamai
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Shorter Height Is Associated With Lower Probability of Liver Transplantation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Eric Lee; Monika Sarkar; Jennifer Dodge; Maureen Kohi; Neil Mehta
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Disparities in Waitlist and Posttransplantation Outcomes in Liver Transplant Registrants and Recipients Aged 18 to 24 Years: Analysis of the UNOS Database.

Authors:  Noelle H Ebel; Evelyn K Hsu; Kristin Berry; Simon P Horslen; George N Ioannou
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.939

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.