Literature DB >> 27473978

Feather conditions and clinical scores as indicators of broilers welfare at the slaughterhouse.

S Saraiva1, C Saraiva2, G Stilwell3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the welfare of 64 different broiler farms on the basis of feather conditions and clinical scores measures collected at the slaughterhouse. A 3-point scale (0, 1 or 2) was used to classify dirty feathers, footpad dermatitis and hock burns measures, and a 2-point scale (present or absent) was used to classify breast burns, breast blisters and breast ulcer measures. Flocks were allocated into three body weight (BW) classes (A, B, C): class A (light) ≥1.43 and ≤1.68kg, class B (medium) ≥1.69 and ≤1.93kg; class C (heavy) ≥1.94 and ≤2.41kg. The absence of hock burns was more common in class A, while mild hock burns was more common in class B flocks. Breast ulcer was observed in class C flocks. The association observed for mild hock burns, breast burns and severe footpad dermatitis can indicate a simultaneous occurrence of these painful lesions. Very dirty feathers and severe footpad dermatitis relationship suggest litter humidity to be the common underlying cause. In conclusion, it was shown that clinical indicators can be used at the slaughterhouse to identify welfare problems. In the studied flocks, footpad dermatitis, feather conditions and hock burns were the main restrictions for good welfare and should be considered significant welfare indicators of the on-farm rearing conditions.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal welfare; Broiler; Clinical score; Feather conditions; Slaughterhouse; Welfare measure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27473978     DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


  6 in total

1.  On-farm broiler chicken welfare assessment using transect sampling reflects environmental inputs and production outcomes.

Authors:  Neila BenSassi; Judit Vas; Guro Vasdal; Xavier Averós; Inma Estévez; Ruth C Newberry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Animal-based welfare indicators of 4 slow-growing broiler genotypes for the approval in an animal welfare label program.

Authors:  Helen Louton; Christiane Keppler; Michael Erhard; Otto van Tuijl; Josef Bachmeier; Klaus Damme; Sven Reese; Elke Rauch
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Animal-Based Measures for the On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Geese.

Authors:  Carlo Tremolada; Halina Bielińska; Michela Minero; Valentina Ferrante; Elisabetta Canali; Sara Barbieri
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Effects of different floor materials on the welfare and behaviour of slow- and fast-growing broilers.

Authors:  Enver Çavuşoğlu; Metin Petek
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2019-06-14

5.  Effects of age, weight, and housing system on prevalence of dead on arrival and carcass condemnation causes in laying hens.

Authors:  S Saraiva; C Saraiva; I Oliveira; G Stilwell; A Esteves
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Effects of common litter types and their physicochemical properties on the welfare of broilers.

Authors:  Tarek Boussaada; Kaouthar Lakhdari; Salha Amira Benatallah Samira Meradi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-06-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.