| Literature DB >> 27473920 |
Suzette Delaloge1, Thomas Bachelot2, François-Clément Bidard3, Marc Espie4, Etienne Brain5, Hervé Bonnefoi6, Joseph Gligorov7, Florence Dalenc8, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard9, David Azria10, Jean-Philippe Jacquin11, Jérôme Lemonnier12, William Jacot10, Anthony Goncalves13, Charles Coutant14, Gérard Ganem15, Thierry Petit16, Frédérique Penault-Llorca17, Marc Debled6, Mario Campone18, Christelle Levy19, Bruno Coudert14, Alain Lortholary20, Laurence Venat-Bouvet21, Julien Grenier22, Hugues Bourgeois15, Bernard Asselain12, Johanna Arvis23, Martine Castro24, Anne Tardivon3, David G Cox25, Patrick Arveux26, Corinne Balleyguier27, Fabrice André28, Roman Rouzier29.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a potentially lethal disease, which requires aggressive treatments and is associated with long-term consequences. Its prognosis is linked to both tumor biology and burden at diagnosis. Although treatments have allowed important improvements in prognosis over the past 20 years, breast cancer screening remains necessary. Mammographic screening allows earlier stage diagnoses and a decrease of breast cancer specific mortality. However, breast cancer screening modalities should be revised with the objective to address demonstrated limitations of mammographic screening (limited benefit, imperfect sensitivity and specificity, overdiagnoses, radiation-induced morbidity). Furthermore, both objective and perceived performances of screening procedures should be improved. Numerous large international efforts are ongoing, leading to scientific progresses that should have rapid clinical implications in this area. Among them is improvement of imaging techniques performance, development of real time diagnosis, and development of new non radiological screening techniques such as the search for circulating tumor DNA, development of biomarkers able to allow precise risk evaluation and stratified screening. As well, overtreatment is currently addressed by biomarker-based de-escalation clinical trials. These advances need to be associated with strong societal support, as well as major paradigm changes regarding the way health and cancer prevention is perceived by individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Biomarqueurs; Breast cancer; Cancer du sein; Dépistage; Personalized; Personnalisé; Risk; Risque; Screening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27473920 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.06.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull Cancer ISSN: 0007-4551 Impact factor: 1.276