| Literature DB >> 27473871 |
Chetan Manral1, Subhadeep Roy1, Manjari Singh1, Swetlana Gautam1, Rajnish K Yadav1, Jitendra K Rawat1, Uma Devi2, Md Nazam Ansari3, Abdulaziz S Saeedan3, Gaurav Kaithwas4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study was in quested to study the effects of β-sitosterol on methyl nitrosourea (MNU) induced mammary gland carcinoma in albino wistar rats.Entities:
Keywords: FAME; Inflammation; Mammary gland; Oxidative stress; P-glycoprotein; β-sitosterol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27473871 PMCID: PMC4966711 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1243-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Effect of MNU and β-sitosterol on differentiation of mammary gland
| Groups | AB1 | AB2 | AB1 + AB2 | LOBULES | DF SCORE- 1 (AB1 + AB2 + LOBULES) | DF SCORE 2 (LOBULES/AB1 + AB2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTROL (3 ml/kg) | 685.75 ± 223.36 | 367.75 ± 79.88 | 1053.5 ± 302.45 | 1805.75 ± 460.39 | 2859.25 ± 756.67 | 1.76 ± 0.09 |
| MNU (47 mg/kg) | 786.5 ± 20.56 | 432.5 ± 36.60 | 1219 ± 57.17 | 2606 ± 243.72 | 3825 ± 300.89 | 2.13 ± 0.09 |
| β-SITOSTEROL + MNU (10 mg/kg + 47 mg/kg) | 532 ± 178.53 | 201.5 ± 48.64* | 733.5 ± 227.17 | 1774.5 ± 417.74 | 2508 ± 644.92 | 2.48 ± 0.19 |
| β-SITOSTEROL + MNU (20 mg/kg + 47 mg/kg) | 380.5 ± 111.83 | 143 ± 2.00** | 523.5 ± 113.83 | 1390.5 ± 142.92 | 1914 ± 256.76 | 2.72 ± 0.31 |
(Values are Mean ± SEM), each group contains eight animals. Comparisons were made on the basis of the one-way Anova followed by Bonferroni test. All groups were compared to the toxic control group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)
Fig. 1Whole mount of mammary gland tissue subjected to carmine staining: Group I: Control, Group II: MNU, Group III: β-sitosterol (10 mg/kg), Group IV: β-sitosterol (20 mg/kg)
Effect of β-sitosterol upon various in-vivo antioxidant markers
| Groups | TBARs (nM of MDA/μg of protein) | GSH (mg %) | SOD (Units of SOD/mg of protein) | Catalase (nM of H2O2/min/mg of protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTROL (3 ml/kg) | 86.08 ± 5.00*** | 2.30 ± 0.12 | 1.92 ± 0 | 50.63 ± 7.81* |
| MNU (47 mg/kg) | 118.84 ± 4.65 | 2.00 ± 0.16 | 1.81 ± 0.02 | 31.76 ± 2.59 |
| β-SITOSTEROL + MNU (10 mg/kg + 47 mg/kg) | 147.93 ± 6.67** | 1.03 ± 0.14** | 1.82 ± 0.03 | 26.90 ± 3.06 |
| β-SITOSTEROL + MNU (20 mg/kg + 47 mg/kg) | 105.51 ± 2.35 | 1.24 ± 0.21* | 1.80 ± 0.03 | 51.75 ± 3.31* |
(Values are Mean ± SEM), each group contains eight animals. Comparisons were made on the basis of the one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test. All groups were compared to the toxic control group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 2Effect of MNU and β-sitosterol on inflammatory markers and nitric oxide level: GroupI : Control, Group II: MNU, Group III: β-Sitosterol (10 mg/kg), Group IV : β-Sitosterol (20 mg/kg)
Fatty acid profiling of mammary gland tissue treated with MNU and β-Sitosterol
| S no. | Type of fatty acid | Control | MNU (47 mg/kg) | β-sitosterol (10 mg/kg) | β-sitosterol (20 mg/kg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Saturated | Unsaturated | |||||
| 1 | C4:00 | Butanoic acid | 0.01 | - | - | - | |
| 2 | C6:00 | Hexanoic acid | 0.04 | 0.02 | - | - | |
| 3 | C8:00 | Octanoic acid | 0.80 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.31 | |
| 4 | C10:0 | Decanoic acid | - | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | |
| 5 | C11:0 | Undecanoic acid | 4.65 | 2.34 | 1.64 | 1.62 | |
| 6 | C12:0 | Dodecanoic acid | 18.08 | 10.47 | 7.94 | 6.92 | |
| 7 | C13:0 | Tridecanoic acid | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | |
| 8 | C14:0 | Tetradecanoic acid | 6.52 | 3.36 | 2.30 | 3.90 | |
| 9 | C14:1 | Myristoleic acid(ω-3) | 27.68 | 16.14 | 13.35 | 10.83 | |
| 10 | C15:0 | Pentadecanoic acid | 1.98 | 1.06 | 0.96 | 0.18 | |
| 11 | C17:1 | Heptadecanoic acid | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.06 | |
| 12 | C18:0 | Octadecanoic acid | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.08 | |
| 13 | C18:1 | Oleic acid(ω-9) | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | |
| 14 | C18:2 | Linoleic acid (ω-6) | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
| Total fatty acid | 59.94 | 34.09 | 26.88 | 24.64 | |||
| Saturated fatty acid | 32.24 | 17.89 | 13.5 | 13.76 | |||
| Unsaturated fatty acid | 27.7 | 16.2 | 13.38 | 10.88 | |||
Fig. 3FAME of the mammary gland tissue subjected to MNU and β-sitosterol: Group I: Control, Group II: MNU, Group III: β-sitosterol (10 mg/kg), Group IV: β-sitosterol (20 mg/kg)
Fig. 4Western Blot analysis: Group I: Control; Group II: MNU; Group III: β-sitosterol10 mg/kg; Group IV: β-sitosterol 20 mg/kg. The western blot analysis containing whole tissue lysate from rat mammary gland was probed for P-gp 9.5 antibody; its immunoreactivity was evident as a band of molecular weight of 27 kDa. In case of control the expression is low in comparison with the toxicant. The low and high dose of β-sitosterol shows a similar pattern of elevated expression in a dose dependent manner. Results of the β-actin analysis are shown as an internal control