| Literature DB >> 27473840 |
Evan Cyril Edmond1,2, Samantha Xue-Li Sim1,3, Hui-Hua Li4, Eng-King Tan5,3, Ling-Ling Chan6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a disabling neurological condition. Vascular tortuosity in HFS patients has not been quantified objectively and its relationship with hypertension and posterior fossa volume (PF) is unknown. In a case control magnetic resonance imaging and angiographic (MRI/A) study, we quantified and compared the vascular tortuosity in HFS and controls, and evaluated its relationship with hypertension and PF.Entities:
Keywords: Hemifacial spasm; Imaging; Tortuosity
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27473840 PMCID: PMC4966585 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0634-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Fig. 1Three-dimensional illustration of vessel selection (blue square dot), centreline extraction (curvilinear yellow line) and length measurements (curvilinear blue line) of the a basilar artery, b dominant left vertebral and c hypoplastic right vertebral arteries, a view from behind. Yellow arrows indicate the horizontal level of the hypoglossal canals. The internal carotid arteries in the background in a are masked in b and c. The vessel length (Lv) is defined as the length of the centreline extraction of each arterial segment and the chord length (Lc) as the shortest distance between the origin and termination point of each arterial segment. The Lv and Lc were measured for each of the three arterial segments, and the tortuosity index derived as the ratio, Lv/Lc
Comparison of demographic and vascular characteristics between HFS patients and controls
| HFS (n-40) | HC ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Median IQR) | 53.5 (48.8, 58.3) | 56.0 (50.0, 58.5) | 0.5824 |
| Sex | 1.0000 | ||
| Female | 25 (62.5 %) | 25 (64.1 %) | |
| Male | 15 (37.5 %) | 14 (35.9 %) | |
| Hypertension | 1.0000 | ||
| No | 18 (45.0 %) | 18 (46.2 %) | |
| Yes | 22 (55.0 %) | 21 (53.8 %) | |
| BA tortuosity (Median IQR) | 1.115 (1.065, 1.225) | 1.120 (1.073, 1.172) | 0.9843 |
| RVA tortuosity (Median IQR) | 1.150 (1.074, 1.288) | 1.150 (1.090, 1.278) | 0.6624 |
| LVA tortuosity (Median IQR) | 1.200 (1.062, 1.397) | 1.190 (1.078, 1.368) | 0.9961 |
Linear regression adjusted by hypertension, posterior fossa volume, gender and age among all subjects
| HFS-control |
| |
|---|---|---|
| BA tortuosity (Median IQR) | 0.010 (–0.040, 0.060) | 0.6980 |
| RVA tortuosity (Median IQR) | −0.012 (–0.094, 0.070) | 0.7820 |
| LVA tortuosity (Median IQR) | 0.019 (–0.087, 0.124) | 0.7320 |
Linear regression adjusted by duration of HFS, hypertension and posterior fossa volume among patients with HFS only
| Right-Left |
| |
|---|---|---|
| BA tortuosity (Median IQR) | −0.072 (–0.153, 0.009) | 0.090 |
| RVA tortuosity (Median IQR) | 0.065 (–0.054, 0.183) | 0.290 |
| LVA tortuosity (Median IQR) | −0.130 (–0.295, 0.035) | 0.130 |
Linear regression adjusted by duration of HFS, hypertension and posterior fossa volume between patients with different VA dominance
| Right-Left |
| |
|---|---|---|
| BA tortuosity (Median IQR) | −0.080 (–0.265, 0.106) | 0.410 |
| RVA tortuosity (Median IQR) | 0.148 (–0.060, 0.356) | 0.179 |
| LVA tortuosity (Median IQR) | −0.131 (–0.492, 0.230) | 0.486 |