Literature DB >> 27473332

Prospective evaluation of five methods used to treat cesarean scar defects.

Xuyin Zhang1, Mengyi Yang1, Qing Wang2, Jianliang Chen3, Jingxin Ding1, Keqin Hua4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate operative and nonoperative therapies for cesarean scar defects (CSDs).
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted among patients who underwent treatment of CSDs at a hospital in Shanghai, China, between April 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014. Treatment included laparoscopy (group 1), vaginal surgery (group 2), hysteroscopy (group 3), combined oral contraceptives (group 4), and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (group 5).
RESULTS: Among 142 participants, 119 patients underwent surgical repair and 23 received nonsurgical (conservative) treatment. Operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay reported for patients in group 3 (n=19) were all lower than those reported for patients in group 1 (n=86) and group 2 (n=14; P<0.001 for all comparisons). Patients who underwent surgery and those in group 4 (n=18) experienced shortened menstrual periods after treatment (P<0.001 for all comparisons). For group 5 (n=5), the duration of menstruation was similar before and after therapy (P=0.89). All 32 women who desired fertility underwent laparoscopy; 12 (37.5%) became pregnant after this procedure.
CONCLUSION: All treatments for CSDs other than the levonorgestrel intrauterine system shortened menstrual periods. Laparoscopic surgery was effective for patients with fertility requirements.
Copyright © 2016 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar defect; Combined oral contraceptives; Hysteroscopy; Laparoscopy; Levonorgestrel intrauterine system; Vaginal surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27473332     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  7 in total

Review 1.  Post-caesarean Niche (Isthmocele) in Uterine Scar: An Update.

Authors:  Vidushi Kulshrestha; Nutan Agarwal; Garima Kachhawa
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-09-21

2.  Hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean scar defect.

Authors:  Yingyu Dou; Da Zeng; Zi'ang Zou; Yajun Wan; Dabao Xu; Songshu Xiao
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Vaginal repaired cesarean section diverticulum is beneficial in women with two prior cesarean sections.

Authors:  Yizhi Wang; Jiarui Li; Husheng Wang; Xipeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Niche-related outcomes after caesarean section and quality of life: a focus group study and review of literature.

Authors:  Sanne I Stegwee; Astrid Beij; Robert A de Leeuw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Lucet F van der Voet; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of hysteroscopic electric resection versus vaginal surgery in the treatment of uterine scar defects after cesarean section.

Authors:  Yongxing Yuan; Jianjian Gao; Jing Wang; Xi Hu; Ping Liu; Hailin Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-07

6.  Obstetrical outcomes after vaginal repair of caesarean scar diverticula in reproductive-aged women.

Authors:  Xingchen Zhou; Xiaoqian Yang; Huihui Chen; Xuhong Fang; Xipeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Stavros Karampelas; Georges Salem Wehbe; Laurent de Landsheere; Dominique A Badr; Linda Tebache; Michelle Nisolle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.