Literature DB >> 27472965

Guideline conflict of interest management and methodology heavily impacts on the strength of recommendations: comparison between two iterations of the American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Guidelines.

Thomas Agoritsas1, Ignacio Neumann2, Carolina Mendoza3, Gordon H Guyatt4.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27472965     DOI： 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN： 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Conflicts of interest disclosure forms and management in critical care clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Waleed Alhazzani; Kimberley Lewis; Roman Jaeschke; Bram Rochwerg; Morten Hylander Møller; Laura Evans; Kevin C Wilson; Sheena Patel; Craig M Coopersmith; Maurizio Cecconi; Gordon Guyatt; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance.

Authors:  Roland Brian Büchter; Alina Weise; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.

Authors:  Thomas Agoritsas; Arnaud Merglen; Anja Fog Heen; Annette Kristiansen; Ignacio Neumann; Juan P Brito; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Paul E Alexander; David M Rind; Per O Vandvik; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.692
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.