Literature DB >> 27472822

Timed Up and Go test: Comparison of kinematics between patients with chronic stroke and healthy subjects.

Céline Bonnyaud1, Didier Pradon2, Isabelle Vaugier3, Nicolas Vuillerme4, Djamel Bensmail5, Nicolas Roche2.   

Abstract

Understanding locomotor behavior is important to guide rehabilitation after stroke. This study compared lower-limb kinematics during the walking and turning sub-tasks of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test in stroke patients and healthy subjects. We also determined the parameters which explain TUG sub-task performance time in healthy subjects. Biomechanical parameters were recorded during the TUG in standardized conditions in 25 healthy individuals and 29 patients with chronic stroke using a 3D motion-analysis system. Parameters were compared between groups and a stepwise regression was used to indicate parameters which explained performance time in the healthy subjects. The percentage difference in step length between the last and first steps was calculated, during walking sub-tasks for each group. Speed, cadence, step length, percentage paretic single support phase, percentage non-paretic swing phase, peak hip extension, knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion were significantly reduced in the Stroke group compared to the Healthy group (p<0.05). In the Healthy group, step length and cadence explained 91% of variance for Go and 86% for Return (walking sub-tasks), and none of the parameters explained the Turn. Previous study in patients with stroke showed that the same parameters explained the variance during the walking sub-tasks and balance-related parameters explained the Turn. The present results showed that step length was differently modulated in each group. Thus the locomotor behavior of patients with stroke during obstacle circumvention is quite specific in light of the results obtained in healthy subjects.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Hemiparesis; Motor control; Oriented-gait; Performance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27472822     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  4 in total

1.  Physical Performance and Fall Risk in Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Dennis Klima; Lindsay Morgan; Michelle Baylor; Cordia Reilly; Daniel Gladmon; Adam Davey
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2018-11-20

2.  Gait turning patterns in chronic ischemic stroke males and its relationship to recovery: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Widjajalaksmi Kusumaningsih; Kevin Triangto; Harris Salim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Kinematic Analysis of 360° Turning in Stroke Survivors Using Wearable Motion Sensors.

Authors:  Masoud Abdollahi; Pranav Madhav Kuber; Michael Shiraishi; Rahul Soangra; Ehsan Rashedi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  The effects of cerebrospinal fluid tap-test on idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: an inertial sensors based assessment.

Authors:  Alberto Ferrari; David Milletti; Giulia Giannini; Sabina Cevoli; Federico Oppi; Giorgio Palandri; Luca Albini-Riccioli; Paolo Mantovani; Laura Anderlucci; Pietro Cortelli; Lorenzo Chiari
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.