Literature DB >> 27472203

Changing trend in the utilisation rate of donated corneas for keratoplasty in the UK: The North East England Study.

D S J Ting1, J Potts1, M Jones2, T Lawther1, W J Armitage3, F C Figueiredo1.   

Abstract

PurposeTo report the changing trend in the utilisation rate of donated corneas for keratoplasty and to examine the reasons for unutilised corneas in the North East of England.MethodsRelevant data were retrospectively collected from a local eye retrieval database and the UK Transplant Registry for two separate years; namely, 2006 and 2010.ResultsThe utilisation rate of donated corneas for keratoplasty improved from 57% (52/92) in 2006 to 71% (220/312) in 2010 (P=0.012). Over the same period, there was a marked reduction of failed serological test results from 24% (22/92) to 5% (14/312) (P<0.001). The leading reasons for unutilised corneas were failed serological test results (22/92, 24%) in 2006 and inadequate tissue quality (23/312, 7%) in 2010. The rate of tissue contamination remained similar between 2006 (4%) and 2010 (6%) (P=0.80). Eleven (4%) corneas were not transplanted due to recipient-related factors in 2010. Donor corneas of inadequate tissue quality were associated with older age (P=0.04) but not with gender, donation site, consent method, death-to-enucleation interval, death-to-processing interval, and storage time in the eye bank.ConclusionThere was a substantial improvement in the utilisation rate of corneas donated in the North East of England between 2006 and 2010. The principal reason was a reduction in failed serological test results. High donor age was associated with increased chance of corneas not being used. Utilisation rate of corneas can be further improved if potential modifiable factors are addressed, such as recipient-related factors and microbial contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27472203      PMCID: PMC5108009          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2016.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  10 in total

1.  [Meeting the demand for quality and safety checked corneal transplants. The role of corneal banks and health care organizations in Germany].

Authors:  R Sundmacher; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  The New Zealand National Eye Bank study: trends in the acquisition and storage of corneal tissue over the decade 2000 to 2009.

Authors:  William J Cunningham; S Louise Moffatt; Nigel H Brookes; Helen C Twohill; David G C Pendergrast; Joanna M Stewart; Charles N J McGhee
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Trends in the indications for corneal graft surgery in the United Kingdom: 1999 through 2009.

Authors:  Tiarnan D L Keenan; Mark N A Jones; Sally Rushton; Fiona M Carley
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05

4.  Keratoplasty in the United States: A 10-Year Review from 2005 through 2014.

Authors:  Choul Yong Park; Jimmy K Lee; Patrick K Gore; Chi-Yeon Lim; Roy S Chuck
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Impact of telephone consent and potential for eye donation in the UK: the Newcastle Eye Centre study.

Authors:  D S J Ting; J Potts; M Jones; T Lawther; W J Armitage; F C Figueiredo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Lack of vision, loss of sight: consequences of mandatory HTLV screening in corneal transplantation.

Authors:  S Thomas; P E Klapper; K J Mutton; A J Turner; A B Tullo; I Zambrano; F Carley; A Taylor
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Evolving indications for and trends in keratoplasty in British Columbia, Canada, from 2002 to 2011: a 10-year review.

Authors:  Johnson C H Tan; Simon P Holland; Paul J Dubord; Gregory Moloney; Martin McCarthy; Sonia N Yeung
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Changing trends in keratoplasty in the West of Scotland: a 10-year review.

Authors:  Darren S J Ting; C Y Sau; S Srinivasan; K Ramaesh; S Mantry; F Roberts
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  The suitability of corneas stored by organ culture for penetrating keratoplasty and influence of donor and recipient factors on 5-year graft survival.

Authors:  W John Armitage; Mark N A Jones; Isaac Zambrano; Fiona Carley; Derek M Tole
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Factors influencing the suitability of organ-cultured corneas for transplantation.

Authors:  W J Armitage; D L Easty
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  A Novel Approach of Harvesting Viable Single Cells from Donor Corneal Endothelium for Cell-Injection Therapy.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Gary Peh; Dawn Jin Hui Neo; Heng-Pei Ang; Khadijah Adnan; Chan Lwin Nyein; Fernando Morales-Wong; Maninder Bhogal; Viridiana Kocaba; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Utilization rate of corneal tissue obtained from donors over 75 years of age in Western India for keratoplasty.

Authors:  Rakesh Shah; Supriya Hirwe; Jatin Ashar; Sabyasachi Sengupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Profile of donors and corneal tissue obtained through hospital cornea retrieval programme in a recently established eye bank of a tertiary care teaching hospital of Eastern India.

Authors:  Sony Sinha; Ranjeet K Sinha; Prateek Nishant
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-07-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.