Literature DB >> 27472199

Bioassays as one of the Green Chemistry tools for assessing environmental quality: A review.

M Wieczerzak1, J Namieśnik2, B Kudłak2.   

Abstract

For centuries, mankind has contributed to irreversible environmental changes, but due to the modern science of recent decades, scientists are able to assess the scale of this impact. The introduction of laws and standards to ensure environmental cleanliness requires comprehensive environmental monitoring, which should also meet the requirements of Green Chemistry. The broad spectrum of Green Chemistry principle applications should also include all of the techniques and methods of pollutant analysis and environmental monitoring. The classical methods of chemical analyses do not always match the twelve principles of Green Chemistry, and they are often expensive and employ toxic and environmentally unfriendly solvents in large quantities. These solvents can generate hazardous and toxic waste while consuming large volumes of resources. Therefore, there is a need to develop reliable techniques that would not only meet the requirements of Green Analytical Chemistry, but they could also complement and sometimes provide an alternative to conventional classical analytical methods. These alternatives may be found in bioassays. Commercially available certified bioassays often come in the form of ready-to-use toxkits, and they are easy to use and relatively inexpensive in comparison with certain conventional analytical methods. The aim of this study is to provide evidence that bioassays can be a complementary alternative to classical methods of analysis and can fulfil Green Analytical Chemistry criteria. The test organisms discussed in this work include single-celled organisms, such as cell lines, fungi (yeast), and bacteria, and multicellular organisms, such as invertebrate and vertebrate animals and plants.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Battery of biotests; Biotests; Ecotoxicity; Green Analytical Chemistry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27472199     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  5 in total

1.  Application of chemometric techniques in studies of toxicity of selected commercially available products for infants and children.

Authors:  Natalia Szczepańska; Błażej Kudłak; Miroslava Nedyalkova; Vasil Simeonov; Jacek Namieśnik
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-06-04       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Biodegradation of Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) by a Microbial Consortium in a Continuous Up-Flow Packed-Bed Biofilm Reactor: Kinetic Study, Metabolite Identification and Toxicity Bioassays.

Authors:  Guadalupe Alfonso-Gordillo; César Mateo Flores-Ortiz; Liliana Morales-Barrera; Eliseo Cristiani-Urbina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ecotoxicity of Concretes with Granulated Slag from Gray Iron Pilot Production as Filler.

Authors:  Helena Hybská; Emília Hroncová; Juraj Ladomerský; Karol Balco; Jozef Mitterpach
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Impact of selected drugs and their binary mixtures on the germination of Sorghum bicolor (sorgo) seeds.

Authors:  Monika Wieczerzak; Błażej Kudłak; Jacek Namieśnik
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Ecotoxicological Estimation of 4-Cumylphenol, 4-t-Octylphenol, Nonylphenol, and Volatile Leachate Phenol Degradation by the Microscopic Fungus Umbelopsis isabellina Using a Battery of Biotests.

Authors:  Tomasz Janicki; Andrzej Długoński; Aleksandra Felczak; Jerzy Długoński; Mariusz Krupiński
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.