| Literature DB >> 27471676 |
Tingting Lin1, Ergang Liu1, Huining He2, Meong Cheol Shin3, Cheol Moon4, Victor C Yang5, Yongzhuo Huang6.
Abstract
Brain delivery of macromolecular therapeutics (e.g., proteins) remains an unsolved problem because of the formidable blood-brain barrier (BBB). Although a direct pathway of nose-to-brain transfer provides an answer to circumventing the BBB and has already been intensively investigated for brain delivery of small drugs, new challenges arise for intranasal delivery of proteins because of their larger size and hydrophilicity. In order to overcome the barriers and take advantage of available pathways (e.g., epithelial tight junctions, uptake by olfactory neurons, transport into brain tissues, and intra-brain diffusion), a low molecular weight protamine (LMWP) cell-penetrating peptide was utilized to facilitate nose-to-brain transport. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPP) have been widely used to mediate macromolecular delivery through many kinds of biobarriers. Our results show that conjugates of LMWP-proteins are able to effectively penetrate into the brain after intranasal administration. The CPP-based intranasal method highlights a promising solution for protein therapy of brain diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Blood–brain barrier; Brain targeting; Cell-penetrating peptide; Intranasal protein delivery; Low molecular weight protamine
Year: 2016 PMID: 27471676 PMCID: PMC4951590 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2016.04.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Figure 1The cell-penetrating LMWP peptide-mediated protein drug from nose to brain delivery.
Figure 2SDS-PAGE characterization of the LMWP–BSA conjugates.
Figure 3Q-TOF mass spectrum of the LMWP–BSA conjugates.
Figure 4In vivo imaging after intranasal administration (up panel) and the fluorescence imaging of the brain tissues at experimental endpoint (bottom panel).
Figure 5LMWP–BSA conjugates were intranasally administered to mice. One hour later, the olfactory bulbs were removed and processed cryosection. Slides were observed using fluorescent microscope. (A) LMWP–BSA–FITC; (B) BSA–FITC.
Figure 6Enzymatic activity of HPR (left panel) and β-gal (right panel). LMWP-linked proteins were represented by grey bars, and native proteins white bars. LMWP-enzymes were significantly higher than their non-modified counterparts (n=3).