Literature DB >> 27471669

Exosomes as therapeutic drug carriers and delivery vehicles across biological membranes: current perspectives and future challenges.

Dinh Ha1, Ningning Yang1, Venkatareddy Nadithe1.   

Abstract

Exosomes are small intracellular membrane-based vesicles with different compositions that are involved in several biological and pathological processes. The exploitation of exosomes as drug delivery vehicles offers important advantages compared to other nanoparticulate drug delivery systems such as liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles; exosomes are non-immunogenic in nature due to similar composition as body׳s own cells. In this article, the origin and structure of exosomes as well as their biological functions are outlined. We will then focus on specific applications of exosomes as drug delivery systems in pharmaceutical drug development. An overview of the advantages and challenges faced when using exosomes as a pharmaceutical drug delivery vehicles will also be discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIX, ALG-2 interacting protein X; ATPase, adenosine triphosphatase; BBB, blood–brain barrier; CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; CD, cluster of differentiation; DIL, 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; Drug delivery systems; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ESCRT, endosomal sorting complexes required for transport; EV, extracellular vesicle; EpCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule; Exosomes; Extracellular vesicles; HEK293, human embryonic kidney cell line 293; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HMGA2, high-mobility group AT-hook protein; HeLa, Henrietta Lacks cells; Hsp, heat shock proteins; IL-6, interleukin-6; ILVs, intraluminal vesicles; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; MAPK-1, mitogen-activated protein kinase 1; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; MPS, mononuclear phagocyte system; MVB, multi-vesicular body biogenesis; Nanocarrier; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PD, Parkinson’s disease; PEG, polyethylene glycol; RNA, ribonucleic acid; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RPE1, retinal pigment epithelial cells 1; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; TSG101, tumor susceptibility gene 101; VPS4, vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 4; kRAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma; mRNA, messenger RNA; miRNA, micro RNA; siRNA, small interference RNA

Year:  2016        PMID: 27471669      PMCID: PMC4951582          DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2016.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B        ISSN: 2211-3835            Impact factor:   11.413


Introduction

Intercellular communication is absolutely essential to cell development and the maintenance of homeostasis in multicellular organisms. These communications between cells can be localized or distant. Local communication involves direct contact between cells facilitated through communication systems, like a gap junction that connects the cytoplasm of cells adjacent to one another, allowing signaling substances to pass between the cells. On the other hand, distant intercellular communication is facilitated by molecules like hormones that send signals through circulatory system to other parts of the body. Another case of distant intercellular communication also occurs in extracellular vesicle (EV), which is a membrane-based structure. These EVs serve as vehicles to carry different types of cellular cargo—such as lipids, proteins, receptors and effector molecules—to the recipient cells. There are three types of EVs that are differentiated based on their intracellular origins: apoptotic bodies, microvesicles and exosomes. Apoptotic bodies have a size ranging from 50 to 5000 nm and contain cellular contents such as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), ribonucleic acid (RNA) and histone proteins. During apoptosis, apoptotic bodies present these contents to marcrophages, which results in cell engulfation3, 4. Other types of EVs known as microvesicles are also referred to as ectosomes, shedding vesicles, microparticles, plasma membrane-derived vesicles, and exovesicles. Microvesicles are formed through the outward budding and fission from plasma membranes, with a size ranging from 50 nm to 1000 nm. Once microvesicles are formed, they carry specific proteins and lipids and then deliver their cargoes to designated recipient cell. The final category of EVs is exosomes, which differ from microvesicles mainly in terms of their intracellular origin and size (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Types of microvesicles. Exosome with sizes ranging 40–100 nm (left), microvesicles with sizes ranging 50–1000 nm (middle), apoptotic body size ranging 50–5000 nm (right).

Over the past decades, there has been extensive research carried out on exosomes. The word “exosome” was first used in 1970 by Rose Johnstone and her colleagues. While working with maturing reticulocytes, they observed the formation of “an intracellular sac filled with small membrane-enclosed structure of nearly uniform size”. These formed intracellular vesicles and released contents outside the cell, as opposed to inside of cell (endocytosis), where external molecules are internalized into the membrane-bound structure. Hence, these intracellular-formed vesicles were named “exosome”. Exosomes are originated from endosomes with a smaller size, ranging from 40 to 100 nm. They are secreted by all cell types and can be found in most body fluids, including blood, saliva, and urine. An exosome is a “nanosphere” with a bilayerd membrane, containing various types of lipids and proteins derived from the parent cell. Some of these proteins include transport proteins, heat shock proteins, proteins associated with multi-vesicular body biogenesis (MVB), and tetraspanin. In addition to proteins, exosomes are comprised of different types of lipids, such as cholesterol, sphingolipids, phosphoglycerides, ceramides, and saturated fatty acid chains. The composition of exosomes is critical since they serve as a biomarker and provide an indication of its function in biological processes.

Formation of exosomes

In general, the formation of exosomes consists of three different stages: (1) the formation of endocytic vesicles from plasma membrane, (2) the inward budding of the endosomal vesicle membrane resulting in MVBs that consist of intraluminal vesicles (ILVs), and (3) the fusion of these MVBs with the plasma membrane, which releases the vesicular contents, known as exosomes (Fig. 2). In the first stage, endocytic vesicles are formed from the plasma membrane, creating an early endosome, which is then matured into late endosomes. The limiting membrane of these late endosomes undergoes inward budding, in turn forming vesicles inside the lumen. The accumulation of these ILVs inside the late endosomes is termed as MVBs. There are two known pathways to the formation of MVBs. One pathway involves endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) and another pathway is ESCRT independent. These MVBs can either fuse with lysosome for degradation or fused with the plasma membrane of the cell, releasing ILVs into extracellular space and these released ILVs are exosomes.
Figure 2

Formation of exosome and microvesicle. Exosome is derived from endosome formed from plasma membrane. As early endosome becomes late endosomes, inward budding occurs and forms multivesicular bodies (MVB) containing numerous intraluminal vesicles (ILV). MVB can either get degraded by lysosomes or fuse with the membrane to release ILV called exosomes. Micorvesicles, on the other hand, originate from the budding of the plasma membrane.

The ESCRT consists of four soluble multi-protein complexes named ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II, and ESCRT-III. The complex is recruited to sort selected proteins into ILVs. ESCRT-0 is responsible for cargo clustering, which is required for the ubiquitination of endocytosed receptors. These cargoes constitute proteins that will be incorporated into ILVs and, later, become part of the released exosomes. Tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101), a component of ESCRT-I, forms a complex with the ubiquinated cargo protein and helps in the activation of ESCRT-II complex, inducing its bud formation. This complex then involves the sequestration of MVB proteins and the recruitment of the de-ubiquitination enzyme to remove the ubiquitin from the cargo proteins before sorting them into ILVs. In the last stage, ESCRT-III gets disassembled by vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 4 (VPS4) adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase)10, 11. Studies have shown that molecules that inhibit ESCRT can also inhibit exosome secretion. For example, four independent studies have demonstrated that inhibiting the HRS member of ESCRT-0 resulted in decreased exosome secretion in various cell types, including Henrietta Lacks cells (HeLa)—a lineage of cancer human epithelial cells, mouse dentritic cells, human embryonic kidney cell line 293 (HEK293), and squamous carcinoma cells12, 13, 14, 15. Other studies have shown that the depletion of TSG101 also reduced exosome secretion in tumor cells and in immortalized retinal pigment epithelial cells 1(RPE1)12, 16. In addition, several studies have shown the formation of exosomes despite the inhibition of ESCRT, indicating the existence of an ESCRT independent pathway. This independent mechanism involves molecules such as lipids, tetraspanins, or heat shock proteins. It has been proposed that lipids such ceramides induce the inward curvature of the limiting membrane of MVBs to form ILVs. Other lipids associated with the formation of exosomes through ESCRT independent mechanisms are cholesterol and phosphophatidic acid. Besides lipids, proteins such as tetraspanins have also been associated with cargo sorting for exosomes and the incorporation of melanosomal proteins into ILVs in an ESCRT-independent manner.

Isolation and characterization of exosomes

Exosomes are isolated in cell culture studies using several different techniques. The most common isolation technique is differential centrifugation, whereby large particles and cell debris in the culture medium are separated using centrifugal force between 200–100,000×g and the exosomes are separated from supernatant by the sedimenting exosomes at 100,000×g20, 21, 22. However, this technique is not precise in purifying exosomes and, thus, the resulting exosome extractions tend to contain aggregates of cellular proteins and particulates from the cell culture medium. In addition, this technique is time consuming and requires specialized equipment. Exosome purity can be improved, however, by centrifuging the samples using flotation density gradient centrifugation with sucrose or Optiprep, which results in highly purified and enriched exosomes1, 24. Another common technique for exosome isolation is the monoclonal antibody based method. Antibodies against exosome-associated antigens—such as cluster of differentiation (CD) molecules CD63, CD81, CD82, CD9, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), and Ras-related protein (Rab5)—are used for separation1, 24. The antibodies can be immobilized in different media conditions and combined with magnetic beads, chromatographic matrix, plates, and microfluidic devices for separation. A drawback to this technique, however, is that non-exosomes vesicles that carry the antigens also bind to the antibody, reducing the purity of the extracted exosomes. Ultrafiltration is another way to isolate exosomes based on their size differences. This method is less time consuming compared to ultracentrifugation and does not require special equipment. One alternative method for isolating exosomes based on size is using high performance liquid chromatography. Exosomes prepared by this technique provide highly purified exosomes. However, this technique also requires expensive equipment1, 7. Overall, there is no single ideal isolation and purification method that is highly selective for exosomes. Exosomes can be characterized based on their size, protein content, and lipid content. Exosomes are sphere-shaped structures with sizes between 40–100 nm and are much smaller compared to other systems, such as a microvesicle, which has a size range from 100–500 nm. Several methods can be used to characterize exosomes, including flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking analysis, dynamic light scattering, western blot, mass spectrometry, and microscopy techniques. Exosomes can also be characterized and marked based on their protein compositions, with intergrins and tetraspanins being the two most abundant proteins found in exosomes. Other protein markers include TSG101, ALG-2 interacting protein X (ALIX), flotillin 1, and cell adhesion molecules. Similar to proteins, lipids are major components of exosomes and can be utilized to characterize them.

Composition of exosomes

The nanospherical membrane-type structure of exosomes is formed with a bilayer of lipids. It is also composed of various types of lipids and proteins (Table 1) that are derived from the parent cells from which the exosome is formed (Fig. 3). According to ExoCarta, an exosome database, there are currently around 8000 proteins and 194 lipids known to be associated with exosomes.
Table 1

Summary and examples of exosomal compositions.

Exosome compositionExample
ProteinsHeat shock proteins: Hsp70, Hsp90
Membrane transport and fusion proteins: GTPase, annexins, flotillin
Tetraspanins: CD9, CD63, CD81, CD82
Thrombospondin
ALIX
TSG101
LipidsSphingomyelin
Phosphatidylcholine
Phosphatidylethanolamine
Phosphatidylserine
GM3
Phosphatidylinositol
Nucleic acidsmRNA
miRNA
Non-coding RNA
Figure 3

Composition of exosomes. Exosomes are composed of various types of proteins, such as major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-II, integrin, cluster of differentiation (CD), tetraspanins, heat shock protein (Hsp), Ras-related protein (Rab), etc. Exosomes also contain various types of lipids, such as sphingomyelin and cholesterol. Lastly, exosomes are found to contain nucleic acid, including miRNA, mRNA and non-coding RNAs.

Since exosomes originate from the intracellular component “endosome”, they contain proteins such as heat shock proteins (Hsp70 and Hsp90), membrane transport and fusion proteins (GTPases. Annexins and flotillin), and tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81, and CD82). Among these proteins, heat shock proteins, annexins, and proteins of the Rab family are abundantly detected in exosomes and are involved in their intracellular assembly and trafficking. Tetraspanins, a family of transmembrane proteins, are another protein commonly detected in exosomes. In a cell, tetraspanins mediate fusion, cell migration, cell–cell adhesion, and signaling. However, in exosomes, their function remains largely unknown. Another abundant protein found in exosomes is integrins, which are adhesion molecules that facilitate cell binding to the extracellular matrix. In exosomes, integrins are involved in adhering the vesicles to their target cells. All these proteins have been used as positive markers to detect the presence of exosomes. Other proteins associated with exosomes include thrombospondin, CD55, CD59, lactadherin, ALIX, and TSG1012, 27. These different types of proteins become incorporated into exosomes during exosome formation and serve as cargo for cell–cell communication. Besides proteins, exosomes are also rich in lipids, with different types of exosomes containing different types of lipids. The lipid bilayer of exosomes is mainly constituted of cell plasma membrane types of lipids such as sphingomyelin, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM3), and phosphatidylinositol. Sphingomyeline and GM3 are responsible for determining the exosome׳s rigidity while phosphatidylserine is expressed on the plasma membrane of exosomes through different types of phospholipid transportation enzymes. It is involved in docking the outer proteins, allowing the signaling and fusion of the exosome to the plasma membrane. Other types of lipids that can form exosomes are cholesterol, ceramide, and phosphoglycerides, along with saturated fatty-acid chains. Additional constituents of exosomes include nucleic acids such as micro RNA (miRNA), messenger RNA (mRNA), and non-coding RNAs.

Biological functions of exosomes

Exosomes are secreted by many different types of cells through biological fluids, including synovial fluid, breast milk, blood, urine, saliva, amniotic liquid, and in-blood serum, suggesting that they play a major role in intercellular communication and triggering physiological responses. Exosomes are found first to be involved in removing unnecessary proteins during the cell maturation process31, 32. Depending on the origin of the exosomes, they have different functions. For example, studies have found that exosomes derived from antigen presenting cells have the ability to express major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II molecules on the cell surface, which helps in activating CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells to induce specific immune responses26, 33, 34. By carrying prostaglandins, exosomes secreted by platelets are involved in the inflammatory response. Besides exchanging proteins and lipids between recipient cells, exosomes are shown to carry a nucleic acid type of cargo, with exosomes secreted by mast cells containing mRNA and small RNA, which then gets transferred to targeted recipient cells and translated into the recipient cell. Glioblastoma cells also secret exosomes containing mRNA, miRNA, and angiogentic proteins to microvascular endothelial cells, stimulating angiogenesis. In general, the functions of exosomes facilitate cell-to-cell communication in a target-specific manner throughout the body. Currently, it is known that exosomes are involved in many biological processes, including the maturation of erythrocytes, the elimination of unnecessary proteins and RNA, antigen presentation in immune responses, coagulation, inflammation, and angiogenesis. Exosomes are also found to have the ability to transfer horizontal miRNA. These processes are facilitated through the exosome׳s cargo function, with each exosome׳s composition based on the source of the parental cell, from which it is derived. Besides involving normal biological process, exosomes are found to be associated with many common diseases. In cancer, for example, exosomes are found to induce a pro-tumoral microenvironment by transferring mRNA and protein, such as mutant Kirsten rat sarcoma (kRAS) viral oncogene protein and c-Met oncoprotein, to distant sites, thus promoting angiogenesis, thrombosis, and tumor cell proliferation39, 40, 41. In neurodegenerative disease, such as Parkinson׳s disease (PD), exosomes are found to be responsible for transporting misfolded proteins from unhealthy neurons to nearby cells, thus spreading the disease from cell to cell. Exosome involvement is also observed in other diseases, such as myocardial infraction and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a type of cardiovascular disease and infectious disease, respectively. Given that exosomes can be isolated from almost any cell, are involved in cell-to-cell communication, and participate in both normal and pathobiological mechanisms, there have been extensive studies exploiting their use both as diagnostics and therapeutics. For example, exosomes are used to detect tumors in patients with prostate, breast, and ovarian cancers43, 44, 45. In infectious disease, they carry and express infectious RNA and proteins, which allows for the diagnosis of infectious diseases as well as the detection of active and latent forms of intracellular infection. In terms of therapeutics, exosomes are shown to have the ability to induce tissue regeneration by delivering growth factors, proteins, miRNA, mRNA, non-coding RNA, and lipids. For example, in a myocardial infarction and kidney injury model, exosomes derived from stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells have been able to regenerate cardiac tissue and neovascularization.

Exosomes as drug delivery vehicle

Currently, the most preferred drug delivery systems are liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles. A liposome is a synthetic vesicle with a phospholipid membrane that self-assembles into various sizes and shapes in an aqueous environment. Polymeric nanoparticles are drug delivery systems that help in the entrapment, encapsulation, or attachment of drug molecules. Both of these delivery systems have been used to deliver different types of drug molecules, including anti-cancer drugs, anti-fungal drugs, and analgesics. However, the ability of an ideal liposome to evade the host immune system with a long circulating capability, with stability, and without toxicity still remains elusive. On the other hand, polymeric nanoparticles may have better stability than liposomal systems, but their biocompatibility and long-term potential safety remain a concern. In these cases, exosomes or exosome mimetics—with many of the desirable features of an ideal drug delivery system, such as a long circulating half-life, the intrinsic ability to target tissues, biocompatibility, and minimal or no inherent toxicity issues—appear to be a superior choice, overcoming the limitations observed with the majority of liposomal or polymeric drug delivery systems. Table 2 summarizes the studies conducted using exosomes as drug delivery system.
Table 2

Summary of studies conducted using exosomes as drug delivery system.

ResearchAimRef. (Author, Year)
Small moleculesUsing exosomes to improve delivery of curcuminSun, 201053
Delivery of doxorubicin into tumor tissueTian, 201454
Deliver paclitaxel and doxorubicin across blood–brain barrierYang, 201555
ProteinDeliver catalase across BBB to treat PDHaney, 201556
Nucleic Acids
 siRNAHuman exosomes to deliver siRNA into T cellsWahlgren, 201257
Exosomes to deliver siRNA into HeLa & Fibrosarcoma cell line (HT1080 cells)Shtam, 201358
Delivery of siRNA using endothelial derived exosomesBanizs, 201459
 miRNAExosome to antitumor miRNA into breast cancer cellsOhno, 201360

Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for small molecules

Extensive research has been done using exosomes as vehicles for therapeutic drug delivery. One study involved the use of exosomes to deliver curcumin and treat an inflammatory disease. Curcumin is a natural polyphenol found in the rhizomes of turmeric and it has anti-inflammatory, antineoplastic, antioxidant, and chemo-preventive properties61, 62, 63. Exosomes are employed to form a complex with curcumin for the purpose of enhancing curcumin׳s effectiveness. Clinical trials have also shown its efficacy and safety for cancer patients. However, its low solubility due to its hydrophobic nature and preferential interaction with lipid membranes reduces its bioavailability. In this study, curcumin was incorporated into exosomes by mixing curcumin with murine tumor cell line (EL-4) derived exosomes and subjecting it to a sucrose-gradient centrifugation. Exosomal protein markers such as TSG101 and CD81 were used to specifically identify the exosome curcumin complex (Fig. 4). Various experiments were then carried out to show the incorporation of curcumin into the exosome while increasing its solubility, stability, and bioavailability. The anti-inflammatory activity of exosomal curcumin was also assessed both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, marcophages treated with exosomal curcumin produced significantly fewer inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) compared to macrophages treated with curcumin alone, indicating that exosomal curcumin enhances anti-inflammatory activity. In vivo, an lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced septic shock animal model was used, and mice treated with exosomal curcumin showed significant survival compared to mice treated with only curcumin. Finally, the study showed that exosomal curcumin decreased the number of CD11b+Gr-1+ cells, a type of cell that increases a response to LPS-induced septic shock in the lungs and leads to acute lung inflammation. In general, this study showed the ability of exosomes to carry highly hydrophobic drugs, such as curcumin, enhancing their anti-inflammatory effects.
Figure 4

Formation of exosomal curcumin. Curcumin was incorporated into murine tumor cell line (EL-4), derived exosomes and isolated using sucrose gradient centrifugation.

Besides enhancing the properties of drugs, exosomes are also employed to carry small molecular drugs across the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Indeed, 98% of potent central nervous system drugs cannot cross the BBB and their conceptual efficacy shown in labs have not been successful in clinical trials. Many Nano-formulations have been employed to solve the problems associated with the permeability of drugs across the BBB. However, other problems, such as nano-toxicity and rapid drug clearance by the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), have also been observed. To compensate for these complications, polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been introduced to decrease MPS drug uptake. However, this resulted in reduced interaction between target cells, consequently decreasing drug distribution in the brain68, 69. In this case, exosomes, a natural product of the body’s own cells, can be tailored to cross the BBB, thus improving drug transport to the brain by decreasing MPS drug clearance (Fig. 5).
Figure 5

Ability of exosome and its drug contents to cross the blood–brain barrier.

Meanwhile, research has been carried out encapsulating anticancer drugs such as paclitaxel and doxorubicin into exosomes, showing the potential of exosomes for brain delivery across the BBB and explaining their transport mechanisms, using zebrafish as an animal model. In that study, exosomes were isolated from various cell lines, including gliobastoma astrocytoma U-87 MG, endothelial bEND.3, neuroectodermal tumor PFSK-1, and glioblastoma A-172, using Invitrogen® total exosome RNA and a protein isolation kit. Exosomes were loaded with rhodamine 123 and paclitaxel or doxorubicin through mixing and incubation. Experiments were then performed to characterize the isolated exosomes, the cellular uptake of the exosomes containing rhodamine 123, and the cytotoxicity of the delivered anticancer drugs within the exosomes of U-87 MG and bEND.3 cells. In vivo, the ability of exosomes to deliver drugs across the BBB was examined by injecting bEND.3-derived exosomes loaded with rhodamine 123 and doxorubicin, or paclitaxel, in zebrafish embryos. At the end of the experiments, brain tissue was examined for the presence of rhodamine 123 fluorescence. The results undeniably showed the drug׳s distribution in the brain region of the zebrafish embryos, suggesting the ability of exosomes to deliver drugs across the BBB. In subsequent experiments, a primary brain cancer model was developed using zebrafish and anticancer drugs loaded within and without exosomes, which were compared. The data showed significant therapeutic efficacy in the zebrafish brain model treated with exosomes loaded doxorubicin compared to doxorubicin alone. Overall, the results obtained from the study showed the potential of exosomes to deliver small molecule drugs across the BBB to treat both brain cancers and neurological disorders. Since these exosomes were small and native to the animals, the researchers were able to avoid phagocytosis, fuse with the cell membrane, and bypass the engulfment by lysosomes. The fact that exosomes are a natural product of the body resulted in a low immune response. Most chemotherapeutic agents, such as doxorubicin, have low solubility and toxicity due to nonspecific tissue targeting and a short half-life, which leads to the poor efficacy of the drugs. Another study was performed using exosomes to deliver the antitumor agent doxorubicin into a mouse tumor tissue model both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, exosomes were isolated and purified from pEGFP-C1-RVG-Lamp2b plasmid that contained immature mouse dendritic cells through centrifugation and ultrafiltration. The isolated exosomes were characterized using nanoparticle tracking analysis loaded with doxorubicin through electroporation. The ability of exosomes to deliver doxorubicin was tested by facilitating the fusion of encapsulated exosomes with a human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Fluorescence measurements and overlap clearly showed successful exosome delivery into the cells. The inhibition of in vitro cancer proliferation was measured by treating MDA-MB-231 with these exosomes and determining cell viability using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assays. The results showed that cell inhibition by doxorubicin encapsulated exosomes was similar to inhibition using free doxorubicin, indicating the anticancer ability of doxorubicin encapsulated exosomes. The ability of exosomes to specifically deliver doxorubicin to tumor tissue and inhibit tumor growth in vivo was analyzed by injecting the fluorescent exosomes. The data showed an accumulation of doxorubicin containing exosomes specifically at the targeted organ and a major suppression of tumor growth. Collectively, the results confirmed the ability of exosomes to target and deliver doxorubicin efficiently.

Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for proteins

In addition to delivering small molecules, exosomes are also used to deliver large molecules such as proteins. A recent study, for example, showed that exosomes loaded with the antioxidant protein catalase was successfully delivered across the BBB, resulting in an improved disease state in PD. PD is associated with inflammation in the brain, microglia activation, and the secretion of reactive oxygen species (ROS)69, 70, 71. Patients with PD are shown to have lower levels of antioxidant enzymes like catalase and superoxide dismutase, which helps in oxidative stress and the inhibition of neurodegeneration72, 73, 74. Catalase is an enzyme that can deactivate one million free radicals per second per molecule in a single cycle of catalytic reaction. Like many other drugs, the delivery of catalase across the BBB is a hurdle, but delivery of catalase to the brain using exosomes seems a promising option for PD therapy. In this study, catalase was incorporated into exosomes using multiple methods: incubation at room temperature with or without the use of saponin permeabilization, freeze–thaw cycles, sonication, and extrusion procedures. Analysis by western blot showed that sonication and extrusion techniques resulted in the most efficient incorporation of catalase into exosomes. To confirm the delivery of catalase, exosomes were labeled with lipophilic fluorescent dye and incubated with a cell line derived from a pheochromocytoma of the rat adrenal medulla (PC12 cells). Confocal images confirmed the uptake of DIL (1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate)-labeled exosomes in PC12 cells. The elimination of ROS in in vitro–activated macrophages was also observed when exosomal catalase was added, suggesting the successful exosomal delivery of catalase and the neutralization of ROS. Further visualization experiments were performed to understand the transportation of exosomes in inflamed brain tissues in a PD mouse model using confocal microscopy. Results showed the wide distribution of exosomes in the brain, indicating the ability of exosomes to target and deliver their cargo to the brain tissue. Overall, this study showed various methods used to isolate exosomes and the ability of exosomes to carry catalase across BBB in the treatment of PD.

Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for nucleic acids

It has also been shown that exosomes naturally carry nucleic acids, such as DNA and RNA, to targeted cells, inducing genetic modifications in both biological and pathogenic processes. These features of exosomes became a major interest in treatment strategies involving genetic therapy, and studies using exosomes as drug delivery systems have been conducted to deliver therapeutic genetic materials that alter gene expression in certain diseases and improve genetic therapy.

Small interference RNA (siRNA)

In genetic therapy, siRNA is used to disrupt genes of interest. However, these siRNA have low stability and tend to degrade quickly in the systemic circulation. Exosomes, however, can act as therapeutic vehicles that help in the protection and delivery of siRNA to the targeted cells. However, determining the utility of exosomes to deliver exogenous siRNA still requires much more investigation and understanding. Several studies have been conducted to test the usefulness of exosomes as therapeutic vehicles to successfully deliver exogenous genetic material and their post-delivery functionality, and the first published study, conducted by Alvarez-Erviti et al., used exosomes to deliver siRNA to the brains of mice. After this first study, another group examined the delivery of siRNA to T cells and monocytes using human exosomes. There is a significant shortage of therapeutic delivery vehicles for genetic materials that are safe, efficient, and target specific. The purpose of that study was to find a method to deliver vectors in gene therapy. Exosomes were used because they have the natural ability to deliver RNA from cell to cell and are non-immunogenic to the host. The purpose of the study was mainly to find a suitable method to deliver vectors in gene therapy In the study, exosomes were isolated using differential centrifugation from various cell types, including the peripheral blood of healthy donors, lung cancer cells TB-177, and HeLa cells. Then, siRNA was introduced into exosomes using two different methods: chemical transfection and electroporation. The results showed that chemical transfection was unsuitable and the data were inconclusive. Analysis by western and northern blotting, confocal microscopy, and flow cytometry suggested the successful introduction of siRNA into exosomes. Plasma exosomes were transfected with Alexa Fluor 488-tagged siRNA against mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MAPK-1) using electrophoresis and then co-cultured with monocytes and lymphocytes isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy donors. siRNA florescence by exosomes was detected in the cytoplasm of the recipient cells. Flow cytometry confirmed the effective delivery of siRNA into peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Additionally, immunoblotting was performed to evaluate the ability of delivered siRNA with exosome to have caused post-transcriptional gene-silencing in recipient cells. Results showed a decrease in MAPK-1 expression by exosomal siRNA, indicating down regulation of the specific gene and successful gene silencing. And the research clearly showed that exosomes can be used as delivery vehicles in genetic therapy. A similar in vitro study also showed the ability of exosomes to deliver siRNA to human cells. RAD51 (a eukaryote gene protein that assists in repair of DNA double strand breaks) has previously been shown as a potential target to repress the growth of abnormally proliferating cells in cancer. In an in vitro study, exosomes-delivered siRNA against RAD51 was used, and its functionality after delivery to human cells was demonstrated. Further, exosomes were isolated from HeLa cells by ultracentrifugation and loaded with Alexa-flour 488-labeled siRNA using chemical treatment and then further co-cultured with recipient cells (HeLa and HT1080 cells). The successful delivery efficiency of siRNA by exosomes was confirmed by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. The study also investigated whether delivered siRNA were efficient and whether they down-regulated the expression of RAD51 and RAD52. Experimental results from western blot analysis showed a considerable reduction in RAD51 and RAD52 protein levels, indicating successful down-regulation of this specific gene. Largely, these results showed the potential of exosomes as therapeutic vehicles by keeping the cargoes they carry functional. However, exosomes derived from different cell types have slightly different compositions and functions. Exosomes derived from endothelial cells are associated with vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. However, little is known about their ability to deliver exogenous contents. Given this context, another study has investigated the use of endothelial exosomes to deliver siRNA to endothelial cells. Exosomes were isolated from endothelial cells by combining filtration and ultracentrifugation techniques, and their interactions with endothelial cells were evaluated. Exosomes were then loaded with siRNA using electroporation, and the functionality of endothelial exosomes to deliver siRNA to endothelial cells was tested. Exosomes loaded with siRNA were incubated with luciferase-expressing endothelial cells. siRNA was designed to silence a vector encoding for the production of luciferase (pGL2) in transiently-transfected endothelial cells with pGL2. The results showed significantly lower luciferase expression in endothelial exosomes carrying siRNA compared to the control groups. This indicates that endothelial exosomes can also deliver exogenous agents to cells in vitro and are functional at the targeted site.

miRNA

miRNA is short form of non-coding RNA and with non-protein nucleotides found in eukaryotic cells. These miRNAs bind to complementary sequences on targeted mRNA and control post-transcriptional gene expression77, 78. Exosomes are known to naturally carry miRNA and, hence, it is logical to use exosomes as a therapeutic vehicle to deliver miRNA to targeted cells. Ohno et al., for example, conducted a study using exosomes to deliver miRNA that targeted epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in breast cancer cells. Various human tumors originated from epithelial showed an elevated level of EGFR expression, suggesting the possibility of using EGFR ligand as cancer drug targets. There has also been evidence suggesting that miRNA, such as let-7a, functions as a tumor suppressor and inhibits the growth of cancer by reducing RAS and high-mobility group AT-hook protein (HMGA2) expression. In the study, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and EGFR-specific peptide (GE11), which binds specifically to EGFR, were incorporated onto the surfaces of exosomes that carried let-7a in order to deliver let-7a to EGFR-expressing cancer tissue. To create GE11- and EPF-positive exosomes, a pDisplay vector encoding GE11 or EGF was transfected into HEK-293 cells. Exosomes were then isolated from the cloned cells by differential centrifugation. The expression of GE11 or EGF on the surface of the exosomes was examined using anti-hemagglutinin and western blot analysis. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and anti-Myc-tag antibodies were also used to confirm the presence of GE11 or EGF on the surface of the exosomes. The ability of GE11- or EGF-positive exosomes to bind to EGFR in various breast cancer cell lines, including HCC70, HCC1954 and MCF-7, were then tested. Exosomes were labeled with PKH67 dye to show the engulfment of exosomes into the recipient cells. Various experiments were then conducted to verify that the exosomes were taken up by an EGFR-dependent mechanism. These results showed that the modified exosomes were taken into recipient cells. In addition, the researchers assessed whether GE11- or EGF-positive exosomes affected cell growth in vitro by performing cell proliferation assays. They found that GE11-positive exosomes did not stimulate EGFR signaling like EGF did and, thus, GE-11 positive exosomes might be more suitable than EGF-positive exosomes. In in vivo experiments, lethal-7 gene (let-7a) was introduced into GE11 exosomes by the lipofection method. Then, GE11 exosomes containing let-7a were intravenously injected into tumor-bearing mice. Since previous studies showed let-7a inhibited tumor growth by reducing the expression level of RAS and HMGA2, the expressions of these genes were examined in injected tumor-bearing mice, using real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis, immunoblotting, and immunostaining. The results showed that let-7a delivered by GE11-exosomes strongly inhibited the expression of HMGA2 in cancer cells. This indicated that exosomes do successfully deliver their cargo to the target cells, showing promising characteristics for drug delivery.

Major advantages and disadvantages

Many of the newer drug candidates such as proteins and nucleic acids are highly unstable inside in vivo environment posing significant challenges to successful therapeutic outcomes. Given the problems associated with many of the current nanoparticulate delivery systems, exosomes as a mimic of “nature's delivery systems” allows for delivery of these biological molecules. Because of the inherent small size and nature׳s own cellular product these vehicles can avoid phagocytosis or degradation by macrophages and can also circulate for extended periods of time within the body. Unlike typical nanoparticulate systems such as liposomes or polymeric nanoparticles, exosomes can potentially avoid the endosomal pathway and lysosomal degradation, and also deliver cargoes directly into the cytoplasm. By virtue of avoiding the endosomal pathway transfection efficiency for molecules such as siRNA can be enhanced. They are naturally stable and have inherent targeting properties depending on the composition of the exosomes. One of the significant advantages of these drug delivery vehicles also includes their ability to cross BBB2, 81. Inadequate understanding of exosomes nature and the role in overall health and disease condition make it complicated to predict long-term safety and therapeutic effect. In vivo trafficking, biological fate and their impact on targeted organs need to be understood more thoroughly. There exist many challenges in a clear understanding of exosomes with regard to therapeutic cargo loading and assembly for drug delivery. Currently, there is no distinct optimal purification technique for isolation of exosomes with high purity. The isolation methods yield low quantities of exosomes and their large scale production for clinical studies and post drug approval is expensive. It is highly likely that future clinical use demands hybrid type of exosome designs, and when combined with therapeutic cargos they may show undesirable effects. If such systems are designed their clinical efficacy and safety parameters needs to be thoroughly characterized. To functionalize exosomes ligands are attached to the surface through chemical conjugation and these active targeting molecular combinational product and methods needs to be investigated. Integrative studies using therapeutic cargo and functional exosomes or hybrid exosomes mimetic are becoming very critical. Even though extensive biology is already known, exosomes comprise heterogeneous components and may show immunogenicity (immunostimulatory or immunospressive) effects based on nature of parental donor cells. Exosomes involvement in tumor progression or help membrane antigens release that help in tumor growth is a huge concern. Exosomes that carry caspase-3 may also inhibit cell death by apoptosis or enhance tumor cell survival by preventing chemotherapeutics drug accumulation. One of the approaches is to design artificial exosomes or exosome mimetics that has the ability to overcome the potential disadvantages such as unwanted immune reactions.

Conclusions

Exosomes provide an enormous promise and a fresh therapeutic area for delivery of different synthetic and biological molecules in cellular therapy. Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles offer a major advantage as there is no unwanted accumulation or homing of exosomes in the liver and (or) avoid the first pass metabolic effect, before reaching target sites. The well characterized exosomes along with long-term safety and natural ability to carry intercellular nucleic acids and therapeutic molecules, across membranes difficult to cross such as BBB, would have major practical significance. Before these drug delivery systems become a therapeutic reality, component characterization and immune reactions need to be clearly understood.
  82 in total

1.  NADPH oxidase mediates oxidative stress in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine model of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Du-Chu Wu; Peter Teismann; Kim Tieu; Miquel Vila; Vernice Jackson-Lewis; Harry Ischiropoulos; Serge Przedborski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Eradication of established murine tumors using a novel cell-free vaccine: dendritic cell-derived exosomes.

Authors:  L Zitvogel; A Regnault; A Lozier; J Wolfers; C Flament; D Tenza; P Ricciardi-Castagnoli; G Raposo; S Amigorena
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Vesicle formation during reticulocyte maturation. Association of plasma membrane activities with released vesicles (exosomes).

Authors:  R M Johnstone; M Adam; J R Hammond; L Orr; C Turbide
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-07-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Activated platelets release two types of membrane vesicles: microvesicles by surface shedding and exosomes derived from exocytosis of multivesicular bodies and alpha-granules.

Authors:  H F Heijnen; A E Schiel; R Fijnheer; H J Geuze; J J Sixma
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Endocytosis, intracellular sorting, and processing of exosomes by dendritic cells.

Authors:  Adrian E Morelli; Adriana T Larregina; William J Shufesky; Mara L G Sullivan; Donna Beer Stolz; Glenn D Papworth; Alan F Zahorchak; Alison J Logar; Zhiliang Wang; Simon C Watkins; Louis D Falo; Angus W Thomson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  A doxorubicin delivery platform using engineered natural membrane vesicle exosomes for targeted tumor therapy.

Authors:  Yanhua Tian; Suping Li; Jian Song; Tianjiao Ji; Motao Zhu; Gregory J Anderson; Jingyan Wei; Guangjun Nie
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Autoantigens are translocated into small apoptotic bodies during early stages of apoptosis.

Authors:  M Schiller; I Bekeredjian-Ding; P Heyder; N Blank; A D Ho; H-M Lorenz
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 8.  Exosome: from internal vesicle of the multivesicular body to intercellular signaling device.

Authors:  K Denzer; M J Kleijmeer; H F Heijnen; W Stoorvogel; H J Geuze
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Plasma exosomes can deliver exogenous short interfering RNA to monocytes and lymphocytes.

Authors:  Jessica Wahlgren; Tanya De L Karlson; Mikael Brisslert; Forugh Vaziri Sani; Esbjörn Telemo; Per Sunnerhagen; Hadi Valadi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Claudin-containing exosomes in the peripheral circulation of women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jianghong Li; Cheryl A Sherman-Baust; Miyun Tsai-Turton; Robert E Bristow; Richard B Roden; Patrice J Morin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  321 in total

1.  Vacuole-inducing compounds that disrupt endolysosomal trafficking stimulate production of exosomes by glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  Zehui Li; Nneka E Mbah; William A Maltese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived exosomes in regenerative medicine and cancer; overview of development, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  Ali Hassanzadeh; Heshu Sulaiman Rahman; Alexander Markov; Judi Januadi Endjun; Angelina Olegovna Zekiy; Max Stanley Chartrand; Nasrin Beheshtkhoo; Mohammad Amin Jadidi Kouhbanani; Faroogh Marofi; Marzieh Nikoo; Mostafa Jarahian
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.832

3.  Effects of gefitinib treatment on cellular uptake of extracellular vesicles in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Tomoya Takenaka; Shinya Nakai; Miku Katayama; Mami Hirano; Natsumi Ueno; Kosuke Noguchi; Tomoka Takatani-Nakase; Ikuo Fujii; Susumu S Kobayashi; Ikuhiko Nakase
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  Aptamer-Functionalized Exosomes: Elucidating the Cellular Uptake Mechanism and the Potential for Cancer-Targeted Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jianmei Zou; Muling Shi; Xiaojing Liu; Cheng Jin; Xiaojing Xing; Liping Qiu; Weihong Tan
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Direct Drug Targeting into Intracellular Compartments: Issues, Limitations, and Future Outlook.

Authors:  Gamaleldin I Harisa; Tarek M Faris
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 6.  miRNA signatures in childhood sarcomas and their clinical implications.

Authors:  G M Viera; K B Salomao; G R de Sousa; M Baroni; L E A Delsin; J A Pezuk; M S Brassesco
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  The use of exosome carrier to augmentation of Helicobacter pylori infection treatment.

Authors:  Saeideh Gholamzadeh Khoei; Hamid Sadeghi; Massoud Saidijam
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2020-12-24

8.  Advances in Plant-derived Edible Nanoparticle-based lipid Nano-drug Delivery Systems as Therapeutic Nanomedicines.

Authors:  Chunhua Yang; Mingzhen Zhang; Didier Merlin
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 9.  RNA interference for glioblastoma therapy: Innovation ladder from the bench to clinical trials.

Authors:  Eunice L Lozada-Delgado; Nilmary Grafals-Ruiz; Pablo E Vivas-Mejía
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 10.  From laboratory to clinic: Translation of extracellular vesicle based cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Anudeep Yekula; Koushik Muralidharan; Keiko M Kang; Lan Wang; Leonora Balaj; Bob S Carter
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.