| Literature DB >> 27471376 |
Joanna Kabat-Koperska1, Agnieszka Kolasa-Wołosiuk2, Bartosz Wojciuk3, Iwona Wojciechowska-Koszko3, Paulina Roszkowska3, Barbara Krasnodębska-Szponder3, Edyta Paczkowska4, Krzysztof Safranow5, Edyta Gołembiewska1, Bogusław Machaliński4, Kazimierz Ciechanowski1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In our study, we assessed the impact of immunosuppressive drug combinations on changes in the immune system of juvenile Wistar rats exposed to these drugs during pregnancy. We primarily concentrated on changes in two organs of the immune system - the thymus and the spleen.Entities:
Keywords: Wistar rats; immune system; immunosuppressive drugs; kidney transplantation; pregnancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27471376 PMCID: PMC4948737 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S102189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
The medication concentration in whole blood and weight of rats in study groups treated with full and half dose of immunosuppressive drugs (additional study groups)
| Drug and dose | CMG group (n=3×2) | TMG group (n=4×2) | CEG group (n=4×2) | Control group (n=3×2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclosporin A (ng/mL) | 69.37±45.61 | – | 50.35±8.80 | – |
| Dose 5 mg/kg | ||||
| Cyclosporin A (ng/mL) | 33.57±41.04 | – | 33.53±12.84 | – |
| Dose 2.5 mg/kg | ||||
| Tacrolimus (ng/mL) | – | 7±6.61 | – | – |
| Dose 4 mg/kg | ||||
| Tacrolimus (ng/mL) | – | 0.77±0.57 | – | – |
| Dose 2 mg/kg | ||||
| Everolimus (ng/mL) | – | – | 1.43±0.17 | – |
| Dose 0.5 mg/kg | ||||
| Everolimus (ng/mL) | – | – | 0.83±0.22 | – |
| Dose 0.25 mg/kg | ||||
| Body mass (g) | 240±21 | 255±12.5 | 245±22.5 | 260±16 |
| Full-dose group | ||||
| Body mass (g) | 250±50.1 | 235±20 | 225±11.5 | 255±15 |
| Half-dose group |
Notes: Results are presented as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation. –, Not applicable.
Abbreviations: CMG, CsA + MMF + prednisone; TMG, Tc + MMF + prednisone; CEG, CsA + everolimus + prednisone; CsA, cyclosporine A; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; Tc, tacrolimus.
Immunophenotyping (cytometry results) of 8-week-old rats from control and CMG group (full dose of drugs) – material from spleen
| Parameter/group | Control group n=10 | CMG group n=5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD3−CD45+ (B lymphocytes) % | |||
| AM ± SD | 14.07±6.085 | 18.41±1.59 | 0.019 |
| Med | 12.825 | 18.35 | |
| Range | 7.76–28.98 | 16.58–20.73 | |
| CD3+CD4+ (T lymphocytes) % | |||
| AM ± SD | 34.06±8.34 | 32.18±2.19 | NS |
| Med | 33.4 | 31.9 | |
| Range | 21.8–53.2 | 29.5–34.9 | |
| CD3+CD8A+ % | |||
| AM ± SD | 11.56±3.7 | 16.5±2.16 | 0.019 |
| Med | 11.1 | 16.9 | |
| Range | 6.1–19.7 | 13.3–19.3 | |
| CD3−CD8A+ (NK cells) % | |||
| AM ± SD | 3.52±1.69 | 5.88±1.905 | 0.028 |
| Med | 2.85 | 5.9 | |
| Range | 2.3–7.5 | 3.5–8.8 |
Abbreviations: AM, arithmetic mean; SD, standard deviation; Med, median; NS, nonsignificant difference; CMG, CsA + MMF + prednisone; NK, natural killer; CsA, cyclosporine A; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil.
Immunophenotyping (cytometry results) of 8-week-old rats in the treatment groups (half dose of drugs) – material from spleen
| Parameter/group | Control group n=10 | CMG group 0.5 n=10 | TMG group 0.5 n=10 | CEG group 0.5 n=7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3−CD45+ (B lymphocytes) % | |||||
| AM ± SD | 14.07±6.085 | 14.49±6.71 | 18.365±3.16 | 17.56±2.71 | 0.0665 |
| Med | 12.825 | 13.005 | 18.58 | 18.21 | |
| Range | 7.76–28.98 | 5.41–27.29 | 11.7–24.16 | 13.0–21.51 | |
| CD3+CD4+ (T lymphocytes) % | |||||
| AM ± SD | 34.06±8.34 | 18.35±9.84 | 36.42±3.16 | 26.13±3.89 | 0.0010 |
| Med | 33.4 | 14.75 | 36.6 | 24.7 | |
| Range | 21.8–53.2 | 4.6–34.0 | 29.6–42.3 | 21.6–33.6 | |
| CD3+CD8A+ % | |||||
| AM ± SD | 11.56±3.7 | 15.54±8.28 | 19.44±2.4 | 11.07±2.18 | 0.0060 |
| Med | 11.1 | 16.35 | 19.3 | 12.2 | |
| Range | 6.1–19.7 | 2.8–26.5 | 15.6–22.9 | 7.3–13.0 | |
| CD3−CD8A+ (NK cells) % | |||||
| AM ± SD | 3.52±1.69 | 11.57±3.94 | 4.22±0.975 | 9.71±3.76 | 0.0000 |
| Med | 2.85 | 10.8 | 4.25 | 9.4 | |
| Range | 2.3–7.5 | 7.3–19.6 | 2.8–6.0 | 4.7–16.6 |
Notes:
P<0.05 versus control group,
P<0.001 versus control group, Mann–Whitney U test.
Abbreviations: AM, arithmetic mean; SD, standard deviation; Med, median; CMG, CsA + MMF + prednisone; TMG, Tc + MMF + prednisone; CEG, CsA + everolimus + prednisone; CsA, cyclosporine A; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; Tc, tacrolimus; NK, natural killer.
IL-17 profile after incubation of lymphocytes from spleen with different doses of ConA (0, 2, and 5 µg/mL)
| Parameter/group | Control group n=12 | CMG group n=5 | CMG group 0.5 n=10 | TMG group 0.5 n=10 | CEG group 0.5 n=7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-17 | ||||||
| ConA0 | 29.923 | 45.569 | 2.404 | 0 | 0 | 0.1416 (NS) |
| ConA2 | 143.78 | 0 | 87.876 | 135.775 | 66.951 | 0.0283 |
| ConA5 | 230.701 | 11.034 | 204.287 | 335.653 | 301.49 | 0.0185 |
Notes: Results are presented as arithmetic mean for all groups (control group; full-dose CMG group, and all half-dose groups).
P<0.01,
P<0.06 versus control group, Mann–Whitney U test.
Abbreviations: ConA, concanavaline A; IL, interleukine; NS, difference nonsignificant; CMG, CsA + MMF + prednisone; TMG, Tc + MMF + prednisone; CEG, CsA + everolimus + prednisone; CsA, cyclosporine; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; Tc, tacrolimus.