Literature DB >> 27471274

Lymphocytic oesophagitis, eosinophilic oesophagitis and compound lymphocytic-eosinophilic oesophagitis I: histological and immunohistochemical findings.

C A Rubio1, T Ichiya2, P T Schmidt2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To report four histological-immunohistochemical oesophagitis phenotypes.
METHODS: Oesophageal biopsies from 311 patients were stained with H&E and with CD3, a T cell marker. Additional immunohistochemical stains (n=413) were performed in 77 cases.
RESULTS: Four histological-immunohistochemical oesophagitis phenotypes were recorded: lymphocytic oesophagitis (LyE, ≥40 CD3+ lymphocytes/HPF in CD3 immunostain), eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE, ≥15 eosinophils/HPF in H&E stain), lymphocytic infiltration (≤39 CD3+/HPF) and compound lymphocytic oesophagitis-eosinophilic oesophagitis (Co LyE-EoE). At index biopsy, 28.3% (n=88) had LyE, 21.2% (n=66) EoE, 10.6% (n=33) Co LyE-EoE and 39.9% (n=124) lymphocytic infiltration. A persistent oesophagitis phenotype was found in 42.5% (37/87) in the first follow-up biopsy, in 34.4% (21/61) in the second follow-up biopsy and in 48.1% (26/54) in the third follow-up biopsy. Using βF1 immunostain, two different surface T cell receptors were detected in LyE and Co Lye-EoE: one having ≥40 βF1+/HPF (βF1+ high) and the other having <39 βF1+/HPF (βF1+ low).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the literature regarding the significance of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) in the initiation of EoE, we submit that the IEL phenotypes in LyE might differ from those found in EoE as they were unable to elicit the same eosinophilic response. Recent studies disclosed that group 2 innate lymphocytes (ILC2s), enriched in EoE, remain undetected in CD3 immunostain as they lack surface markers for T, B, natural killer (NK) or NK T cells. If ILC2s also participate in the lymphocytic infiltration of EoE, then the frequency of cases with Co LyE-EoE here reported might have been much higher. The four oesophagitis phenotypes described are easy to recognise, provided that the dual staining procedure (H&E-CD3) is implemented. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EOSINOPHILS; LYMPHOCYTE MARKERS; LYMPHOCYTES; OESOPHAGUS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27471274     DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  5 in total

Review 1.  Esophagitis unrelated to reflux disease: current status and emerging diagnostic challenges.

Authors:  Melanie E Johncilla; Amitabh Srivastava
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Role of innate lymphoid cells in allergic diseases.

Authors:  M Asghar Pasha; Gargi Patel; Russell Hopp; Qi Yang
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.587

3.  Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic characteristics of lymphocytic esophagitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mohamad Habbal; Michael A Scaffidi; Amir Rumman; Rishad Khan; Mirusha Ramaj; Ahmed Al-Mazroui; Michael J Abunassar; Thurarshen Jeyalingam; Akshay Shetty; Gabor P Kandel; Catherine J Streutker; Samir C Grover
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.230

4.  Carbonic Anhydrases II, IX, and XII in Reflux Esophagitis.

Authors:  Heikki Huhta; Tuomo J Karttunen; Minna Nortunen; Nina Väkiparta; Seppo Parkkila; Juha Saarnio
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  Pathophysiology of reflux oesophagitis: role of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 and Farnesoid X receptor.

Authors:  Minna Nortunen; Nina Väkiparta; Katja Porvari; Juha Saarnio; Tuomo J Karttunen; Heikki Huhta
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.064

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.