Literature DB >> 27471261

Live imaging of X chromosome reactivation dynamics in early mouse development can discriminate naïve from primed pluripotent stem cells.

Shin Kobayashi1, Yusuke Hosoi2, Hirosuke Shiura2, Kazuo Yamagata3, Saori Takahashi2, Yoshitaka Fujihara3, Takashi Kohda2, Masaru Okabe3, Fumitoshi Ishino2.   

Abstract

Pluripotent stem cells can be classified into two distinct states, naïve and primed, which show different degrees of potency. One difficulty in stem cell research is the inability to distinguish these states in live cells. Studies on female mice have shown that reactivation of inactive X chromosomes occurs in the naïve state, while one of the X chromosomes is inactivated in the primed state. Therefore, we aimed to distinguish the two states by monitoring X chromosome reactivation. Thus far, X chromosome reactivation has been analysed using fixed cells; here, we inserted different fluorescent reporter gene cassettes (mCherry and eGFP) into each X chromosome. Using these knock-in 'Momiji' mice, we detected X chromosome reactivation accurately in live embryos, and confirmed that the pluripotent states of embryos were stable ex vivo, as represented by embryonic and epiblast stem cells in terms of X chromosome reactivation. Thus, Momiji mice provide a simple and accurate method for identifying stem cell status based on X chromosome reactivation.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early mouse development; Live-cell imaging; Pluripotent stem cells; X chromosome inactivation; X chromosome reactivation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27471261     DOI: 10.1242/dev.136739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  10 in total

Review 1.  Primate embryogenesis predicts the hallmarks of human naïve pluripotency.

Authors:  Thorsten Boroviak; Jennifer Nichols
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 2.  Epigenetic differences between naïve and primed pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Saori Takahashi; Shin Kobayashi; Ichiro Hiratani
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Live cell imaging of X chromosome reactivation during somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Thi Hai Yen Tran; Aya Fukuda; Shiho Aizawa; Phuong Linh Bui; Yohei Hayashi; Ken Nishimura; Koji Hisatake
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2018-07-24

Review 4.  Genes that escape from X-chromosome inactivation: Potential contributors to Klinefelter syndrome.

Authors:  Maria Jose Navarro-Cobos; Bradley P Balaton; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.908

5.  Female mice lacking Ftx lncRNA exhibit impaired X-chromosome inactivation and a microphthalmia-like phenotype.

Authors:  Yusuke Hosoi; Miki Soma; Hirosuke Shiura; Takashi Sado; Hidetoshi Hasuwa; Kuniya Abe; Takashi Kohda; Fumitoshi Ishino; Shin Kobayashi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Allele-specific RNA imaging shows that allelic imbalances can arise in tissues through transcriptional bursting.

Authors:  Orsolya Symmons; Marcello Chang; Ian A Mellis; Jennifer M Kalish; Jihwan Park; Katalin Suszták; Marisa S Bartolomei; Arjun Raj
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Embryonic Cul4b is important for epiblast growth and location of primitive streak layer cells.

Authors:  Chun-Yu Chen; I-Shing Yu; Chen-Hsueh Pai; Chien-Yu Lin; Shu-Rung Lin; You-Tzung Chen; Shu-Wha Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visualization of X chromosome reactivation in mouse primordial germ cells in vivo.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Haramoto; Mino Sakata; Shin Kobayashi
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.422

9.  Early reactivation of clustered genes on the inactive X chromosome during somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Shiho Aizawa; Ken Nishimura; Gonzalo Seminario Mondejar; Arun Kumar; Phuong Linh Bui; Yen Thi Hai Tran; Akihiro Kuno; Masafumi Muratani; Shin Kobayashi; Tsukasa Nabekura; Akira Shibuya; Eiji Sugihara; Taka-Aki Sato; Aya Fukuda; Yohei Hayashi; Koji Hisatake
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 7.294

10.  Single-Cell Landscape of Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Cell Fate Decisions during Mouse Early Gastrulation.

Authors:  Hisham Mohammed; Irene Hernando-Herraez; Aurora Savino; Antonio Scialdone; Iain Macaulay; Carla Mulas; Tamir Chandra; Thierry Voet; Wendy Dean; Jennifer Nichols; John C Marioni; Wolf Reik
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 9.423

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.