Literature DB >> 27471077

The Labile Limits of Forbidden Interactions.

Juan P González-Varo1, Anna Traveset2.   

Abstract

Forbidden links are defined as pairwise interactions that are prevented by the biological traits of the species. We focus here on the neglected importance of intraspecific trait variation in the forbidden link concept. We show how intraspecific trait variability at different spatiotemporal scales, and through ontogeny, reduces the expected prevalence of forbidden interactions. We also highlight how behavior can foster interactions that, from traits, would be predicted to be forbidden. We therefore discuss the drawbacks of frameworks recently developed to infer biotic interactions using available trait data (mean values). Mispredictions can have disproportionate effects on inferences about community dynamics. Thus, we suggest including intraspecific variability in trait-based models and using them to guide the sampling of real interactions in the field for validation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  biotic interactions; ecological networks; intraspecific variability; trait matching

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27471077     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  9 in total

1.  Interspecific competition for frugivores: population-level seed dispersal in contrasting fruiting communities.

Authors:  Beatriz Rumeu; Miguel Álvarez-Villanueva; Juan M Arroyo; Juan P González-Varo
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Defaunation effects on plant recruitment depend on size matching and size trade-offs in seed-dispersal networks.

Authors:  Isabel Donoso; Matthias Schleuning; Daniel García; Jochen Fründ
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Intraspecific variation in fruit-frugivore interactions: effects of fruiting neighborhood and consequences for seed dispersal.

Authors:  Tadeu J Guerra; Roberta L C Dayrell; André J Arruda; Wesley Dáttilo; Alberto L Teixido; João V S Messeder; Fernando A O Silveira
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Mechanisms underlying interaction frequencies and robustness in a novel seed dispersal network: lessons for restoration.

Authors:  Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni; Jinelle H Sperry; J Patrick Kelley; Jeffrey T Foster; Donald R Drake; Samuel B Case; Jason M Gleditsch; Amy M Hruska; Rebecca C Wilcox; Corey E Tarwater
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Species interactions in an Andean bird-flowering plant network: phenology is more important than abundance or morphology.

Authors:  Oscar Gonzalez; Bette A Loiselle
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Simulated tri-trophic networks reveal complex relationships between species diversity and interaction diversity.

Authors:  Nicholas A Pardikes; Will Lumpkin; Paul J Hurtado; Lee A Dyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of intraspecific variation in seed dispersal are diverse and pervasive.

Authors:  Eugene W Schupp; Rafal Zwolak; Landon R Jones; Rebecca S Snell; Noelle G Beckman; Clare Aslan; Brittany R Cavazos; Edu Effiom; Evan C Fricke; Flavia Montaño-Centellas; John Poulsen; Onja H Razafindratsima; Manette E Sandor; Katriona Shea
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.276

8.  Total Bee Dependence on One Flower Species Despite Available Congeners of Similar Floral Shape.

Authors:  Juan P González-Varo; F Javier Ortiz-Sánchez; Montserrat Vilà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Zooming into plant-flower visitor networks: an individual trait-based approach.

Authors:  Beatriz Rumeu; Danny J Sheath; Joseph E Hawes; Thomas C Ings
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.