Literature DB >> 27471018

Intervention to reduce recreational screen-time in adolescents: Outcomes and mediators from the 'Switch-Off 4 Healthy Minds' (S4HM) cluster randomized controlled trial.

Mark J Babic1, Jordan J Smith2, Philip J Morgan3, Chris Lonsdale4, Ronald C Plotnikoff5, Narelle Eather6, Geoff Skinner7, Amanda L Baker8, Emma Pollock9, David R Lubans10.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of the 'Switch-off 4 Healthy Minds' (S4HM) intervention on recreational screen-time in adolescents.
METHODS: Cluster randomized controlled trial with study measures at baseline and 6-months (post-intervention). Eligible participants reported exceeding recreational screen-time recommendations (i.e., >2h/day). In total, 322 adolescents (mean age=14.4±0.6years) from eight secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia were recruited. The S4HM intervention was guided by Self-Determination Theory and included: an interactive seminar, eHealth messaging, a behavioral contract and parental newsletters. The primary outcome was recreational screen-time. Secondary outcomes included mental health (i.e., well-being, psychological distress, self-perceptions), objectively measured physical activity, and body mass index (BMI). Outcome analyses were conducted using linear mixed models and mediation was examined using a product-of-coefficients test.
RESULTS: At post-intervention, significant reductions in screen-time were observed in both groups, with a greater reduction observed in the intervention group (-50min/day versus -29min, p<0.05 for both). However, the adjusted difference in change between groups was not statistically significant (mean=-21.3min/day, p=0.255). There were no significant intervention effects for mental health outcomes, physical activity or BMI. Significant mediation effects for autonomous motivation were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Participants in both the S4HM intervention and control groups significantly reduced their screen-time, with no group-by-time effects. Enhancing autonomous motivation might be a useful intervention target for trials aimed at reducing adolescents' recreational screen-time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614000163606.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Physical activity; School; Screen; Sedentary behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27471018     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  16 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of mediators of physical activity, nutrition, and screen time in adolescents: Implications for future research and clinical practice.

Authors:  Stephanie Kelly; Janna Stephens; Jacqueline Hoying; Colleen McGovern; Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk; Lisa Militello
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Mediators of change in screen-time in a school-based intervention for adolescent boys: findings from the ATLAS cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jordan J Smith; Philip J Morgan; Chris Lonsdale; Kerry Dally; Ronald C Plotnikoff; David R Lubans
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-11-14

Review 3.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Hilary Caldwell; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-23

4.  The Minne-Loppet Motivation Study: An Intervention to Increase Motivation for Outdoor Winter Physical Activity in Ethnically and Racially Diverse Elementary Schools.

Authors:  Jonathan M Miller; Julian Wolfson; Melissa N Laska; Toben F Nelson; Mark A Pereira
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2018-04-12

5.  Physical Activity of German Children and Adolescents 2003-2012: The MoMo-Study.

Authors:  Steffen C E Schmidt; Annette Henn; Claudia Albrecht; Alexander Woll
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  School-based Physical Activity Interventions in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mikel Vaquero-Solís; Damián Iglesias Gallego; Miguel Ángel Tapia-Serrano; Juan J Pulido; Pedro Antonio Sánchez-Miguel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Determinants of change in accelerometer-assessed sedentary behaviour in children 0 to 6 years of age: A systematic review.

Authors:  Liane B Azevedo; Esther M F van Sluijs; Helen J Moore; Kathryn Hesketh
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 9.213

8.  Physical activity and screen time of children and adolescents before and during the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany: a natural experiment.

Authors:  Steffen C E Schmidt; Bastian Anedda; Alexander Burchartz; Ana Eichsteller; Simon Kolb; Carina Nigg; Claudia Niessner; Doris Oriwol; Annette Worth; Alexander Woll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Short-term efficacy of reducing screen media use on physical activity, sleep, and physiological stress in families with children aged 4-14: study protocol for the SCREENS randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Gillies Banke Rasmussen; Jesper Pedersen; Line Grønholt Olesen; Søren Brage; Heidi Klakk; Peter Lund Kristensen; Jan Christian Brønd; Anders Grøntved
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The effectiveness and complexity of interventions targeting sedentary behaviour across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicole E Blackburn; Jason J Wilson; Ilona I McMullan; Paolo Caserotti; Maria Giné-Garriga; Katharina Wirth; Laura Coll-Planas; Sergi Blancafort Alias; Marta Roqué; Manuela Deidda; Andrew T Kunzmann; Dhayana Dallmeier; Mark A Tully
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.