Literature DB >> 27470686

Continuing Delay in the Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Mathew D Schur1, Lindsay M Andras1, Alexander M Broom1, Kody K Barrett1, Christine A Bowman2, Herman Luther3, Rachel Y Goldstein1, Nicholas D Fletcher2, Michael B Millis3, Robert Runner2, David L Skaggs4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the time from symptom onset to diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has improved over a recent decade compared with reports of previous decades. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of 481 patients admitted with a diagnosis of SCFE at three large pediatric hospitals between January 2003 and December 2012.
RESULTS: The average time from symptom onset to diagnosis of SCFE was 17 weeks (range, 0-to 169). There were no significant differences in time from symptom onset to diagnosis across 2-year intervals of the 10-year study period (P = .94). The time from evaluation by first provider to diagnosis was significantly shorter for patients evaluated at an orthopedic clinic (mean, 0 weeks; range, 0-0 weeks) compared with patients evaluated by a primary care provider (mean, 4 weeks; range, 0-52 weeks; r = 0.24; P = .003) or at an emergency department (mean, 6 weeks, range, 0-104 weeks; r = 0.36; P = .008). Fifty-two patients (10.8%) developed a second SCFE after treatment of the first affected side. The time from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis for the second episode of SCFE was significantly shorter (r = 0.19; P < .001), with mean interval of 11 weeks (range, 0-104 weeks) from symptom onset to diagnosis. There were significantly more cases of mildly severe SCFE, as defined by the Wilson classification scheme, in second episodes of SCFE compared with first episodes of SCFE (OR, 4.44; P = .001).
CONCLUSION: Despite reports documenting a lag in time to the diagnosis of SCFE more than a decade ago, there has been no improvement in the speed of diagnosis. Decreases in both the time to diagnosis and the severity of findings for the second episode of SCFE suggest that the education of at-risk children and their families (or providers) may be of benefit in decreasing this delay.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  no improvement in delay in diagnosis; second slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27470686     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  11 in total

Review 1.  Evolving Understanding of and Treatment Approaches to Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Authors:  James D Wylie; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-06

2.  Examining delays in diagnosis for slipped capital femoral epiphysis from a health disparities perspective.

Authors:  Maureen Purcell; Rustin Reeves; Matthew Mayfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  CORR Insights®: What is the Accuracy and Reliability of the Peritubercle Lucency Sign on Radiographs for Early Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Compared With MRI as the Gold Standard?

Authors:  Kit M Song
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: What Is the Accuracy and Reliability of the Peritubercle Lucency Sign on Radiographs for Early Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Compared with MRI as the Gold Standard?

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Patricia E Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  SCFE: clinical aspects, diagnosis, and classification.

Authors:  M B Millis
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Diagnosing slipped capital femoral epiphysis amongst various medical specialists.

Authors:  A Lam; S A Boenerjous; Y Lo; J M Abzug; J Kurian; M C Liszewski; D E Sanderson; J M Scholnick; B H Taragin; J A Gomez; N Y Otsuka; R Hanstein
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Causes of Delayed Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: The Importance of the Frog Lateral Pelvis Projection.

Authors:  Panagiotis V Samelis; Christos Loukas; Sophia Kantanoleon; Harris Lalos; Nikolaos Anoua; Panagiotis Kolovos; Flourentzos Georgiou; Apostolos-Lykourgos Konstantinou
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-18

8.  What Is the Accuracy and Reliability of the Peritubercle Lucency Sign on Radiographs for Early Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Compared With MRI as the Gold Standard?

Authors:  Daniel A Maranho; Sarah D Bixby; Patricia E Miller; Shayan Hosseinzadeh; Michael George; Young-Jo Kim; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a population-based study.

Authors:  Bengt Herngren; Margaretha Stenmarker; Ludek Vavruch; Gunnar Hagglund
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Outcomes after slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a population-based study with three-year follow-up.

Authors:  B Herngren; M Stenmarker; K Enskär; G Hägglund
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.