Literature DB >> 27470674

Diet, bite force and skull morphology in the generalist rodent morphotype.

R Maestri1, B D Patterson2, R Fornel3, L R Monteiro4, T R O de Freitas5,6.   

Abstract

For many vertebrate species, bite force plays an important functional role. Ecological characteristics of a species' niche, such as diet, are often associated with bite force. Previous evidence suggests a biomechanical trade-off between rodents specialized for gnawing, which feed mainly on seeds, and those specialized for chewing, which feed mainly on green vegetation. We tested the hypothesis that gnawers are stronger biters than chewers. We estimated bite force and measured skull and mandible shape and size in 63 genera of a major rodent radiation (the myomorph sigmodontines). Analysis of the influence of diet on bite force and morphology was made in a comparative framework. We then used phylogenetic path analysis to uncover the most probable causal relationships linking diet and bite force. Both granivores (gnawers) and herbivores (chewers) have a similar high bite force, leading us to reject the initial hypothesis. Path analysis reveals that bite force is more likely influenced by diet than the reverse causality. The absence of a trade-off between herbivores and granivores may be associated with the generalist nature of the myomorph condition seen in sigmodontine rodents. Both gnawing and chewing sigmodontines exhibit similar, intermediate phenotypes, at least compared to extreme gnawers (squirrels) and chewers (chinchillas). Only insectivorous rodents appear to be moving towards a different direction in the shape space, through some notable changes in morphology. In terms of diet, natural selection alters bite force through changes in size and shape, indicating that organisms adjust their bite force in tandem with changes in food items.
© 2016 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2016 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rodentia; chew; diet evolution; feeding; functional morphology; gnaw; myomorph; natural selection; phylogenetic path analysis; sigmodontines

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27470674     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  9 in total

1.  Morphological divergence in giant fossil dormice.

Authors:  Jesse J Hennekam; Roger B J Benson; Victoria L Herridge; Nathan Jeffery; Enric Torres-Roig; Josep Antoni Alcover; Philip G Cox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Comparative masticatory myology in anteaters and its implications for interpreting morphological convergence in myrmecophagous placentals.

Authors:  Sérgio Ferreira-Cardoso; Pierre-Henri Fabre; Benoit de Thoisy; Frédéric Delsuc; Lionel Hautier
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Muroid rodent phylogenetics: 900-species tree reveals increasing diversification rates.

Authors:  Scott J Steppan; John J Schenk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Species-Specific Glucose-6-Phosphatase Activity in the Small Intestine-Studies in Three Different Mammalian Models.

Authors:  Viola Varga; Zsófia Murányi; Anita Kurucz; Paola Marcolongo; Angelo Benedetti; Gábor Bánhegyi; Éva Margittai
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Skull morphological evolution in Malagasy endemic Nesomyinae rodents.

Authors:  Léa Terray; Christiane Denys; Steven M Goodman; Voahangy Soarimalala; Aude Lalis; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Environmental determinism, and not interspecific competition, drives morphological variability in Australasian warblers (Acanthizidae).

Authors:  Vicente García-Navas; Marta Rodríguez-Rey; Petter Z Marki; Les Christidis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Correlation of skull morphology and bite force in a bird-eating bat (Ia io; Vespertilionidae).

Authors:  Biye Shi; Yuze Wang; Lixin Gong; Yang Chang; Tong Liu; Xin Zhao; Aiqing Lin; Jiang Feng; Tinglei Jiang
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  The Better to Eat You With: Bite Force in the Naked Mole-Rat (Heterocephalus glaber) Is Stronger Than Predicted Based on Body Size.

Authors:  Natalee J Hite; Cody Germain; Blake W Cain; Mason Sheldon; Sai Saketh Nandan Perala; Diana K Sarko
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-04

9.  Size matters: micro-evolution in Polynesian rats highlights body size changes as initial stage in evolution.

Authors:  Alexandra A E van der Geer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.061

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.