Literature DB >> 27470494

Prediction of postoperative opioid analgesia using clinical-experimental parameters and electroencephalography.

M Gram1, J Erlenwein2, F Petzke2, D Falla3, M Przemeck4, M I Emons2, M Reuster2, S S Olesen1, A M Drewes1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Opioids are often used for pain treatment, but the response is often insufficient and dependent on e.g. the pain condition, genetic factors and drug class. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify biomarkers to enable selection of the appropriate drug for the individual patient, a concept known as personalized medicine. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and clinical parameters can provide some guidance for response, but better and more objective biomarkers are urgently warranted. Electroencephalography (EEG) may be suitable since it assesses the central nervous system where opioids mediate their effects.
METHODS: Clinical parameters, QST and EEG (during rest and tonic pain) was recorded from patients the day prior to total hip replacement surgery. Postoperative pain treatment was performed using oxycodone and piritramide as patient-controlled analgesia. Patients were stratified into responders and non-responders based on pain ratings 24 h post-surgery. Parameters were analysed using conventional group-wise statistical methods. Furthermore, EEG was analysed by machine learning to predict individual response.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included, of which 51 responded to postoperative opioid treatment (30 non-responders). Conventional statistics showed that more severe pre-existing chronic pain was prevalent among non-responders to opioid treatment (p = 0.04). Preoperative EEG analysis was able to predict responders with an accuracy of 65% (p = 0.009), but only during tonic pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain grade before surgery is associated with the outcome of postoperative pain treatment. Furthermore, EEG shows potential as an objective biomarker and might be used to predict postoperative opioid analgesia. SIGNIFICANCE: The current clinical study demonstrates the viability of EEG as a biomarker and with results consistent with previous experimental results. The combined method of machine learning and electroencephalography offers promising results for future developments of personalized pain treatment.
© 2016 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27470494     DOI: 10.1002/ejp.921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  7 in total

1.  Quantifying the Pharmacodynamics of Morphine in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain in Preverbal Children.

Authors:  Sebastiaan C Goulooze; Tirsa de Kluis; Monique van Dijk; Ilse Ceelie; Saskia N de Wildt; Dick Tibboel; Elke H J Krekels; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Neuroimaging-based biomarkers for pain: state of the field and current directions.

Authors:  Maite M van der Miesen; Martin A Lindquist; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-08-07

Review 3.  Sensor Technologies to Manage the Physiological Traits of Chronic Pain: A Review.

Authors:  David Naranjo-Hernández; Javier Reina-Tosina; Laura M Roa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  The effectiveness of an oral opioid rescue medication algorithm for postoperative pain management compared to PCIA : A cohort analysis.

Authors:  J Erlenwein; M I Emons; F Petzke; M Quintel; I Staboulidou; M Przemeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Novel Analgesic Index for Postoperative Pain Assessment Based on a Photoplethysmographic Spectrogram and Convolutional Neural Network: Observational Study.

Authors:  Byung-Moon Choi; Ji Yeon Yim; Hangsik Shin; Gyujeong Noh
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Prediction of opioid dose in cancer pain patients using genetic profiling: not yet an option with support vector machine learning.

Authors:  Anne Estrup Olesen; Debbie Grønlund; Mikkel Gram; Frank Skorpen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Pål Klepstad
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-01-27

Review 7.  Machine learning in pain research.

Authors:  Jörn Lötsch; Alfred Ultsch
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.961

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.