Literature DB >> 27469990

Factors driving the use of dermoscopy in Europe: a pan-European survey.

A M Forsea1, P Tschandl2, V Del Marmol3, I Zalaudek4, H P Soyer5, A C Geller6, G Argenziano7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When used correctly, dermoscopy is an essential tool for helping clinicians in the diagnosis of skin diseases and the early detection of skin cancers. Despite its proven benefits, there is a lack of data about how European dermatologists use dermoscopy in everyday practice.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the motivations, obstacles and modifiable factors influencing the use of dermoscopy in daily dermatology practice across Europe.
METHODS: All registered dermatologists in 32 European countries were invited to complete an online survey of 20 questions regarding demographic and practice characteristics, dermoscopy training and self-confidence in dermoscopic skills, patterns of dermoscopy use, reasons for not using dermoscopy and attitudes relating to dermoscopy utility.
RESULTS: We collected 7480 valid answers, of which 89% reported use of dermoscopy. The main reasons for not using dermoscopy were lack of equipment (58% of nonusers) and lack of training (42%). Dermoscopy training during residency was reported by 41% of dermoscopy users and by 12% of nonusers (P < 0·001). Dermatologists working in public hospitals were the least likely to use dermoscopy. High use of dermoscopy across the spectrum of skin diseases was reported by 62% of dermoscopy users and was associated with dermoscopy training during residency, the use of polarized light and digital dermoscopy devices, longer dermoscopy practice, younger age and female gender.
CONCLUSIONS: Expanding access to dermoscopy equipment, especially in public healthcare facilities and establishing dermoscopy training during dermatology residency would further enhance the substantially high dermoscopy use across European countries.
© 2016 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27469990     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin lesion classification: an open, web-based, international, diagnostic study.

Authors:  Philipp Tschandl; Noel Codella; Bengü Nisa Akay; Giuseppe Argenziano; Ralph P Braun; Horacio Cabo; David Gutman; Allan Halpern; Brian Helba; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Aimilios Lallas; Jan Lapins; Caterina Longo; Josep Malvehy; Michael A Marchetti; Ashfaq Marghoob; Scott Menzies; Amanda Oakley; John Paoli; Susana Puig; Christoph Rinner; Cliff Rosendahl; Alon Scope; Christoph Sinz; H Peter Soyer; Luc Thomas; Iris Zalaudek; Harald Kittler
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  [Dermatoscopy-30 years after the First Consensus Conference].

Authors:  Andreas Blum; Friedrich A Bahmer; Jürgen Bauer; Ralph P Braun; Brigitte Coras-Stepanek; Teresa Deinlein; Thomas Eigentler; Christine Fink; Claus Garbe; Holger A Haenssle; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Harald Kittler; Jürgen Kreusch; Hubert Pehamberger; Hans Schulz; H Peter Soyer; Wilhelm Stolz; Philipp Tschandl; Iris Zalaudek
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Dermoscopic features of basal cell carcinoma and its subtypes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ofer Reiter; Ilit Mimouni; Stephen Dusza; Allan C Halpern; Yael Anne Leshem; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 15.487

4.  Analysis of dermoscopy teaching modalities in United States dermatology residency programs.

Authors:  Yun An Chen; Joanne Rill; Elizabeth V Seiverling
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2017-07-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.