Lars C Gormsen1, Elias Immanuel Sundelin2, Jonas Brorson Jensen3,2, Mikkel Holm Vendelbo3, Steen Jakobsen3, Ole Lajord Munk3, Mette Marie Hougaard Christensen4, Kim Brøsen4,5, Jørgen Frøkiær3, Niels Jessen2,6. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark lars.christian.gormsen@clin.au.dk. 2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 4. Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. 5. Department of Public Health, Clinical Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; and. 6. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
Metformin is the most widely prescribed oral antiglycemic drug, with few adverse effects. However, surprisingly little is known about its human biodistribution and target tissue metabolism. In animal experiments, we have shown that metformin can be labeled by 11C and that 11C-metformin PET can be used to measure renal function. Here, we extend these preclinical findings by a first-in-human 11C-metformin PET dosimetry, biodistribution, and tissue kinetics study. METHODS: Nine subjects (3 women and 6 men) participated in 2 studies: in the first study, human radiation dosimetry and biodistribution of 11C-metformin were estimated in 4 subjects (2 women and 2 men) by whole-body PET. In the second study, 11C-metformin tissue kinetics were measured in response to both intravenous and oral radiotracer administration. A dynamic PET scan with a field of view covering target tissues of metformin (liver, kidneys, intestines, and skeletal muscle) was obtained for 90 (intravenous) and 120 (oral) min. RESULTS: Radiation dosimetry was acceptable, with effective doses of 9.5 μSv/MBq (intravenous administration) and 18.1 μSv/MBq (oral administration). Whole-body PET revealed that 11C-metformin was primarily taken up by the kidneys, urinary bladder, and liver but also to a lesser extent in salivary glands, skeletal muscle, and intestines. Reversible 2-tissue-compartment kinetics was observed in the liver, and volume of distribution was calculated to be 2.45 mL/mL (arterial input) or 2.66 mL/mL (portal and arterial input). In the kidneys, compartmental models did not adequately fit the experimental data, and volume of distribution was therefore estimated by a linear approach to be 6.83 mL/mL. Skeletal muscle and intestinal tissue kinetics were best described by 2-tissue-compartment kinetics and showed only discrete tracer uptake. Liver 11C-metformin uptake was pronounced after oral administration of the tracer, with tissue-to-blood ratio double what was observed after intravenous administration. Only slow accumulation of 11C-metformin was observed in muscle. There was no elimination of 11C-metformin through the bile both during the intravenous and during the oral part of the study. CONCLUSION: 11C-metformin is suitable for imaging metformin uptake in target tissues and may prove a valuable tool to assess the impact of metformin treatment in patients with varying metformin transport capacity.
Metformin is the most widely prescribed oral antiglycemic drug, with few adverse effects. However, surprisingly little is known about its human biodistribution and target tissue metabolism. In animal experiments, we have shown that metformin can be labeled by 11C and that 11C-metformin PET can be used to measure renal function. Here, we extend these preclinical findings by a first-in-human11C-metformin PET dosimetry, biodistribution, and tissue kinetics study. METHODS: Nine subjects (3 women and 6 men) participated in 2 studies: in the first study, human radiation dosimetry and biodistribution of 11C-metformin were estimated in 4 subjects (2 women and 2 men) by whole-body PET. In the second study, 11C-metformin tissue kinetics were measured in response to both intravenous and oral radiotracer administration. A dynamic PET scan with a field of view covering target tissues of metformin (liver, kidneys, intestines, and skeletal muscle) was obtained for 90 (intravenous) and 120 (oral) min. RESULTS: Radiation dosimetry was acceptable, with effective doses of 9.5 μSv/MBq (intravenous administration) and 18.1 μSv/MBq (oral administration). Whole-body PET revealed that 11C-metformin was primarily taken up by the kidneys, urinary bladder, and liver but also to a lesser extent in salivary glands, skeletal muscle, and intestines. Reversible 2-tissue-compartment kinetics was observed in the liver, and volume of distribution was calculated to be 2.45 mL/mL (arterial input) or 2.66 mL/mL (portal and arterial input). In the kidneys, compartmental models did not adequately fit the experimental data, and volume of distribution was therefore estimated by a linear approach to be 6.83 mL/mL. Skeletal muscle and intestinal tissue kinetics were best described by 2-tissue-compartment kinetics and showed only discrete tracer uptake. Liver 11C-metformin uptake was pronounced after oral administration of the tracer, with tissue-to-blood ratio double what was observed after intravenous administration. Only slow accumulation of 11C-metformin was observed in muscle. There was no elimination of 11C-metformin through the bile both during the intravenous and during the oral part of the study. CONCLUSION:11C-metformin is suitable for imaging metformin uptake in target tissues and may prove a valuable tool to assess the impact of metformin treatment in patients with varying metformin transport capacity.
Authors: Cornelius von Morze; Michael A Ohliger; Irene Marco-Rius; David M Wilson; Robert R Flavell; David Pearce; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz; Zhen J Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Elias Immanuel Ordell Sundelin; Lars Christian Gormsen; Sara Heebøll; Mikkel Holm Vendelbo; Steen Jakobsen; Ole Lajord Munk; Søren Feddersen; Kim Brøsen; Stephen Jacques Hamilton-Dutoit; Steen Bønløkke Pedersen; Henning Grønbaek; Niels Jessen Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Sonja K Soo; Paige D Rudich; Annika Traa; Namasthée Harris-Gauthier; Hazel J Shields; Jeremy M Van Raamsdonk Journal: Mech Ageing Dev Date: 2020-06-28 Impact factor: 5.432
Authors: Elias Immanuel Ordell Sundelin; Nidal Al-Suliman; Pernille Vahl; Mikkel Vendelbo; Ole Lajord Munk; Steen Jakobsen; Steen Bønløkke Pedersen; Jørgen Frøkiær; Lars C Gormsen; Niels Jessen Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 4.872