| Literature DB >> 27468950 |
Yuebang Yin1, Yijin Wang1, Wen Dang1, Lei Xu1, Junhong Su2, Xinying Zhou1, Wenshi Wang1, Krzysztof Felczak3, Luc J W van der Laan4, Krzysztof W Pankiewicz3, Annemiek A van der Eijk5, Marcel Bijvelds1, Dave Sprengers1, Hugo de Jonge1, Marion P G Koopmans5, Herold J Metselaar1, Maikel P Peppelenbosch1, Qiuwei Pan6.
Abstract
Rotavirus infection has emerged as an important cause of complications in organ transplantation recipients. Immunosuppressants used to prevent alloreactivity can also interfere with virus infection, but the direct effects of the specific type of immunosuppressants on rotavirus infection are still unclear. Here we profiled the effects of different immunosuppressants on rotavirus using a 2D culture model of Caco2 human intestinal cell line and a 3D model of human primary intestinal organoids inoculated with laboratory and patient-derived rotavirus strains. We found that the responsiveness of rotavirus to Cyclosporine A treatment was moderate and strictly regulated in an opposite direction by its cellular targets cyclophilin A and B. Treatment with mycophenolic acid (MPA) resulted in a 99% inhibition of viral RNA production at the clinically relevant concentration (10 μg/ml) in Caco2 cells. This effect was further confirmed in organoids. Importantly, continuous treatment with MPA for 30 passages did not attenuate its antiviral potency, indicating a high barrier to drug resistance development. Mechanistically, the antiviral effects of MPA act via inhibiting the IMPDH enzyme and resulting in guanosine nucleotide depletion. Thus for transplantation patients at risk for rotavirus infection, the choice of MPA as an immunosuppressive agent appears rational.Entities:
Keywords: Immunosuppressants; Intestinal organoids; Mycophenolic acid; Rotavirus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27468950 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.07.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antiviral Res ISSN: 0166-3542 Impact factor: 5.970