Literature DB >> 27468395

Research advances on structure and biological functions of integrins.

Li Pan1, Yuan Zhao1, Zhijie Yuan1, Guixin Qin1.   

Abstract

Integrins are an important family of adhesion molecules that were first discovered two decades ago. Integrins are transmembrane heterodimeric glycoprotein receptors consisting of α and β subunits, and are comprised of an extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic tail. Therein, integrin cytoplasmic domains may associate directly with numerous cytoskeletal proteins and intracellular signaling molecules, which are crucial for modulating fundamental cell processes and functions including cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and survival. The purpose of this review is to describe the unique structure of each integrin subunit, primary cytoplasmic association proteins, and transduction signaling pathway of integrins, with an emphasis on their biological functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adhesion; Associated proteins; Biological function; Integrin; Signal transduction pathway; Structure

Year:  2016        PMID: 27468395      PMCID: PMC4947080          DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2502-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Springerplus        ISSN: 2193-1801


Background

Integrins are heterodimers consisting of two subunits. Hynes discovered there were 18 α and 8 β subunits forming 24 αβ heterodimers by noncovalent bonds (Hynes 2002). An electron microscope result showed that integrins have a globular head and two leg regions (one from α subunits and the other from β subunits) inserted into the plasma membrane, indicating each integrin subunit has an extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic tail (Srichai and Zent 2010). The α subunits mainly decide the type of ligands, and both α and β subunits are involved in cell signal transduction which are assisted by the contribution of adhesion molecules. The characteristics of integrin function and molecular diversity were initially clarified in 2000 (Zamir et al. 2000). Based on the unique structure of integrins, including the α- and β-subunits, integrins can bind with extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as collagen (CO), laminin (LN), firbronection (FN), vitronectin (VN), and some other cellular receptors (Plow et al. 2000). The discovery of integrins at molecular level occurred in the late 1970s and 1980s, which was followed by further discoveries of integrin adhesion-related proteins, including structural protein members and signaling molecules (Rohrschneider 1980). Among these, the short intracellular cytoplasmic domains of integrins may associate directly with numerous cytoskeletal proteins and intracellular signaling molecules. These associated proteins provide a basis for modulating fundamental cell processes and various biological outcomes including proliferation, migration, cell differentiation, and apoptosis (Schwartz et al. 1995) by regulating signal transduction pathways. In recent years, many researchers have gradually developed a deep understanding of integrins using techniques like gene knockout, overexpression and specific antibodies. Meanwhile, researchers have also realized the crucial roles of integrins and make a greatly improved understanding for their unique structure, biological function, and integrin-mediated signal transduction mechanism in multiple cellular processes. This review mainly focuses on the thorough understanding of the different subunit structural characteristics, biological functions, and associated proteins in cells.

Integrin structure and distribution

Integrin α subunits

The structures of different α subunits are very similar. The extracellular domains contain 7 homologous repeat domains with 30–40 amino acids, and the interval between these sequences has 20–30 amino acids. Extracellular domains also contain a ‘metal-ion-dependent adhesive site’ (MIDAS) that can bind divalent metal cations (Mg2+ or Ca2+) and is important in ligand binding. The transmembrane domains of integrins are single-spanning structures with 5 common amino acid sequences, ‘GFFKR’, its specific function is regulating integrin affinity by mediating an alpha–beta subunit cytoplasmic tail interaction. Cytoplasm domains of α subunits are generally short. At least 18 α subunits have been found, including α1–α11, αD, αE, αL, αM, αV, αX, and αIIb. To date, their molecular structures have been studied using X-rays, nuclear magnetic resonance, electron microscopy, and three-dimensional ultrasonography. The components of extracellular domains include I-domain, β-Propeller, Thigh, Calf-1, and Calf-2 (Fig. 1). Nine different α subunits (α1, α2, α10, α11, αD, αL, αE, αM, αX) contain the I-domain structure, which is crucial for ligand binding sites. Several other α subunits (α3, α4, α5, α6, α7, α8, α9, αV, αIIb) contain no I-domain but constitute the ligand binding sites by β-Propeller. This article describes the characteristics of α subunit structures and tissue distributions in detail as shown in Table 1.
Fig. 1

Structure, primary cytoplasmic association proteins and biological functions of integrins

Table 1

Structural characteristics and tissue distributions of α subunits

Integrin subunitsMolecular weight (kDa)Heterodimeric typeStructural characteristicsTissue distributionsReferences
α1210α1β1Has I-domain structure and heavily N-glycosylated when compared with other α chainsEmbryo, liver, muscle, several inflammation tissues and epithelial cellsIsacke and Horton (2000)
α2165α2β1Has I-domain structure and three cation binding sitesEpiderm in proliferation basal layerIsacke and Horton (2000), Teige et al. (2010)
α3130, 25α3β1No I-domain structure although has seven homologous repeated domains and most membrane proximal domains of α3, have divalent cation binding sitesHistological abnormalities of kidney, lungs, small skin blisters and glomerulusIsacke and Horton (2000), Romanska et al. (2013)
α4150α4β1, α4β7No I-domain structure, otherwise extracellular portions of α4 have three EF-hand loop-like domains for divalent cations bindingPlacenta and heart during embryogenesis, also in ladder smooth muscle cellsIsacke and Horton (2000), Luo et al. (2013)
α5135, 25α5β1No I-domain structure, yet has five potential divalent cation binding sitesEmbryo, vascellum, wound healing tissues and epithelial cellsIsacke and Horton (2000), Tartaglia et al. (2013)
α6120, 30α6β1, α6β4Structure is most homologous to integrin α3Platelet, basal surface of most epithelial cells, schwann cells, keratinocytes, prostate cancer cells and endothelial cellsIsacke and Horton (2000), Mercurio et al. (2001), Wilschut et al. (2011), Stewart and O’Connor (2015), Berg et al. (2016)
α7100, 30α7β1No I-domain structure, otherwise proteolytically cleavedSkeletal muscles, smooth muscles, cardiac muscle and nervous system(Isacke and Horton 2000)
α8α8β1No I-domain structure, yet proteolytically cleavedSmooth muscles, kidney and epithelial cellsIsacke and Horton (2000), Benoit et al. (2009)
α9α9β1No I-domain structure, still post-translationally cleavedIntestinal epithelia, skin, muscles and liverIsacke and Horton (2000), Hynes (2002)
α10160α10β1Structure is most homologous to integrin α1 and α2Heart and skeletal musclesHynes (2002), Isacke and Horton (2000)
α11α11β1The longest integrin α chain with 1166 amino acids and has I-domain structure, however has no GFFKR sequenceAdult uterus, heart and skeletal musclesZhang et al. (2002), Velling et al. (1999)
αv125, 25αvβ1, αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, αvβ8No I-domain structure, otherwise proteolytically cleavedNeural crest cells, muscles, glial cells, epithelia, osteoclasts, and blood vessels during development or angiogenesisDelannet et al. (1994), Breuss et al. (1995), Drake et al. (1995), Isacke and Horton (2000), Kaneko et al. (2014)
αIIb125, 22αIIbβ3No I-domain structure, yet proteolytically cleavedHuman blood platelets and macrophagocyteIsacke and Horton (2000), Ley et al. (2016)
αD150αDβ2Has I-domain structureTissue macrophages such as spleen and peripheral blood leucocytesIsacke and Horton (2000)
αL180αLβ2Has I-domain structure and an imperfect MIDAS, with seven repetitive domains in extracellular domainsLeukocyte receptorsShimaoka et al. (2002), Springer and Sen (2016)
αM170αMβ2Has I-domain structure although not proteolytically cleaved, with five exposed loops surrounding MIDASLeukocyte receptorsHee et al. (2007)
αX150αXβ2Has I-domain structure yet not proteolytically cleaved, with five exposed loops surrounding MIDASLeukocyte receptorsIsacke and Horton (2000)
αE150, 25αLβ7Has I-domain structure even proteolytically cleavedLeukocyte receptorsIsacke and Horton (2000)
Structure, primary cytoplasmic association proteins and biological functions of integrins Structural characteristics and tissue distributions of α subunits

Integrin β subunits

Integrin β subunits have an I-like domain similar to the I-domain in α subunits which is crucial for ligand binding. Other components include a plexin/semaphorin/integrin (PSI) domain, a hybrid domain, four epidermal growth factor (EGF) repeats, and a membrane proximal b tail domain (bTD), shown in Fig. 1. The β subunits also contain a large extracellular domain, a single-spanning transmembrane domain, and a short cytoplasmic tail (except for β4). The cytoplasmic domains lack catalytic activity themselves and are comprised of 60 amino acids (except for β4, which contains 1000 amino acids) (Hogervorst et al. 1990). Its cytoplasmic domains typically have two NP × Y sequences that provide binding sites to many proteins with phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domains (Bouaouina et al. 2008) and participate in cellular signal transduction by linking with cytoplasmic signal molecules (Gilcrease 2007). The super-family of integrin β can be divided into β1–β8 and their structural characteristics and tissue distributions are described in Table 2.
Table 2

Structural characteristics and tissue distributions of β subunits

Integrin subunitsMolecular weight (kDa)Heterodimeric typeStructural characteristicsTissue distributionsReferences
β1115α1β1, α2β1, α3β1, α4β1, α5β1, α6β1, α7β1, α8β1, α9β1, α10β1, α11β1, αvβ1Has 56 residues in four repeat regions and internally disulphide boundedWidely distributedIsacke and Horton (2000)
β295αDβ2, αLβ2, αMβ2, αXβ2Cytoplasmic tail contains eight potential phosphorylation sitesLeucocytesIsacke and Horton (2000), Takada et al. (2007)
β3105αvβ3, αIIbβ3Its Tyr 773 is potentially phosphorylatedPlatelets and macrophagesCoppolino and Dedhar (2000), Isacke and Horton (2000), Mor-Cohen (2016)
β4220α6β4Contains a large cytoplasmic domain approximately 1000 amino acidsEpithelial cellsMercurio et al. (2001)
β5100αvβ5Neural crest cells, blood vessels and tumorsMemmo and McKeown-Longo (1998), Hu et al. (2014)
β6105αvβ6Has a small cytoplasmic extension with unique 11 amino acidsEpithelial cellsBandyopadhyay and Raghavan (2009)
β7110α4β7, αEβ7Has two NPX(Y/F) motifs for potential tyrosine kinase bindingNK cells, B cells, eosinophils, intraepithelial cells, lymphocytes and peripheral cellsSchippers et al. (2012)
β895αvβ8No interact with cytoskeletonKidney, placenta, uterus, ovary and transformed cell linesIsacke and Horton (2000)
Structural characteristics and tissue distributions of β subunits

Integrin-associated proteins

Integrin cytoplasmic domains associate directly with numerous cytoskeletal proteins and intracellular signaling molecules to modulate fundamental cell processes, as is shown in Fig. 1. Both α and β chains can participate in ligand binding specificity, but β chains alone seem to define cytoskeletal interactions. The ability of integrin cytoplasmic domains may associate directly with several cytoskeletal proteins including α-actinin, talin, filamin, paxillin, and tensin (Reszka et al. 1992; Otey et al. 1993; Lyman et al. 1997; Geiger et al. 2001). Their binding sites and functions to integrins were summarized in Table 3.
Table 3

Integrin-associated proteins (cytoskeletal proteins)

Cytoskeletal proteinsBinding sites to integrinsFunctionsRoles in diseasesReferences
α-actininCentral repeat of α-actinin can bind to integrin β1 and activated β2Membrane-spanning region can bindto integrin β3Cytoplasmic domain position can bind to integrin αIIbEnhancing signaling from matrix adhesion sites and stimulating integrin-mediated cell-to-matrix adhesionNon-muscle α-actinins playing roles in the development and progression of cancer, such as metastatic breast, colorectal, pancreatic and ovarian cancer etcPavalk and LaRoche (1993), Vinogradova et al. (2002), Kikuchi et al. (2008), Barbolina et al. (2008)
TalinContaining an atypical four point one protein, ezrin, radixin and moesin (FERM) domain that binding to integrin cytoplasmic tailsImportant for transducing signals, actin network organization, focal adhesion composition, and integrin activationOver expression leading the progression to metastatic disease such as prostate cancerDesiniotis and Kyprianou (2011), Kim et al. (2011), Goult et al. (2013), Das et al. (2014), Tan et al. (2015)
FilaminBinding to integrin β tailsImportant in integrin signaling transduction and the reorganization of the actin cytoskeletonMutation causing congenital anomalies and epileptic seizuresFeng and Walsh (2004), Robertson (2005), Robertson et al. (2006), Kim et al. (2010)
PaxillinBinding to the membrane proximal region of the integrin β1Acting as a crucial intermediary in the transduction of signals generated by cell adhesion through integrinsHas an association between Paxillin gene expression and invasive tumor behavior, including lung cancer and breast carcinoma etcSchaller et al. (1995), Tanaka et al. (1996), Salgia et al. (1999), Madan et al. (2006)
TensinContaining a PTB domainInvolved in integrin-mediated focal adhesionsNegativity producing unfavorable prognosis in terms of overall survival in breast cancerLo et al. (1994), Yang et al. (2016)
Integrin-associated proteins (cytoskeletal proteins) In addition, integrin cytoplasmic domains may also interact directly with several intracellular signaling proteins such as cytohesin-1 (Kolanus et al. 1996), focal adhesion kinase (FAK) (Schaller et al. 1995), integrin-linked kinase (ILK) (Hannigan et al. 1996), β3-endonexin (Shattil et al. 1995), cytoplasmic domain associated protein-1 (ICAP-1) (Chang et al. 1997), receptor for activated protein kinase C (Rack1) (Liliental and Chang 1998), and calcium- and integrin-binding protein (CIB) (Naik et al. 1997) (Table 4).
Table 4

Integrin-associated proteins (intracellular signaling proteins)

Intracellular signaling proteinsBinding sites to integrinsFunctionsRoles in diseasesReferences
Cytohesin-1Sec7 domain binds to cytoplasmic tail of integrin β2Affecting the PI3 K-dependent activation of integrin β2Regulating human polymorphonuclear neutrophilNagel et al. (1998), Azreqa and Bourgoina (2011)
FAKDirectly binding to integrin β1 tailPlaying an essential role in integrin-stimulated signaling mechanismImportant for tumor progression in cancerSun et al. (2014)
ILKC-terminus of ILK binding to the cytoplasmic tails of integrin β1 and β3Regulating actin cytoskeleton by interacting with various actin-binding actin regulatory proteins and mediating the integrin-dependent signalingPlaying an important function to upregulate several types of cancers, as leukemiaPersad and Dedhar (2003), Böttcher et al. (2009)
β3-endonexinBinding to integrin β3 cytoplasmic tail (Asn-IIe-Thr-Tyr (NITY) motif)Increasing integrins affinity for ligandPlaying roles in proliferative disease, for example atherosclerosis.Hannigan et al. (1996)
ICAP-1C-terminal region containing a PTB domain that providing a binding site for integrin β1Acting as a messenger that transmits information to the cellular nucleus for controlling gene expression and cell proliferation in a β1-independent mannerImportant for body development and pathogenesisBouvard et al. (2006), Faurobert et al. (2012)
Rack1Interacting with the cytoplasmic tails of integrin β1, β2, and β5Important in the control of integrin-dependent PKC associated signaling cascadesServing as a scaffold protein in promoting angiogenesisLiliental and Chang (1998), Li et al. (2000)
CIBInteracting with integrinMain function still needing to be tested in a cellular environmentNaik et al. (1997)
Integrin-associated proteins (intracellular signaling proteins)

Biological functions and related signaling pathways

Integrins are responsible for sensing many aspects of the cellular microenvironment, including the composition and structure of the ECM and some biochemical signals generated by growth factor or cytokine stimulation. Integrins transmit bidirectional signaling across the plasma membrane by coupling extracellular conformational changes via the unclasping and separation of α and β transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains (Luo and Springer 2006). Inside-out signals regulate integrin affinity for adhesive ligands, outside-in signals depend on ligands that regulate cellular responses to adhesion (Ginsberg et al. 2005). Integrins have no intrinsic catalytic activities, and they transduce intracellular signals via adaptor proteins. Integration of these complex signals contributes to mediate cell biological processes (Parsons et al. 2010).

Integrins in cell adhesion

Integrin-mediated cell adhesion to extracellular matrix components is essential for the organization, maintenance, and repair of numerous tissues (De and Georges-Labouesse 2000). The cell adhesion process is complex and has a series of steps (Friedl and Wolf 2003), including binding to the extracellular matrix, receptor clustering, and the recruitment of cytoskeletal elements. Integrin-mediated cell adhesion occurs via focal adhesions involving the signaling pathway through ILK (serving as a multifunctional adaptor protein that links focal adhesion to the actin cytoskeleton (Hannigan et al. 2005), FAK, phospholipase C (PLC), and the activation of Pho family proteins. Therein, FAK modulates integrin activity (Lawson et al. 2012) and increases tyrosine phosphorylation in response to integrin activation depending on an intact integrin β cytoplasmic tail (Burridge et al. 1992). The Pho family proteins are important as well. Even the exact relationships between GTPase and integrin mediated-signal pathway are not clear, the integrin-dependent regulation of intracellular PH can occur by Pho GTPase, which has necessary effects on cell spreading and cell adhesion (Tominaga and Barber 1998). The signaling molecules involved in integrin-mediated adhesion are the upstream pathways that mediate other cell functions. Therefore, it is easy to see the link between cell adhesion and other integrin-mediated biological functions such as cell proliferation, survival, and migration. This may explain why integrin α5β1, after binding with FN and intracellular cytoskeletal components located in partial adhesion sites, can induce a series of signal transductions affecting cell motility and migration (Su et al. 2005). Kiwanuka et al. (2013) also indicated that α5β1, αVβ1, and αVβ6 integrin formed adhesions to provide points of traction for cell translocation during keratinocyte migration. Therefore, cell adhesion is the precondition of integrin-mediated biological functions.

Integrins in cell proliferation

Proliferation of mammalian cells is regulated by various environmental factors, primarily adhesion to ECM. Integrin-mediated adhesion and soluble factors are crucial to cell proliferation, the loss of cell adhesion leads to cell invasion and apoptosis (Blandin et al. 2016). A related study showed that integrins could be an indispensable player during intestinal tumorigenesis and serve as functional platforms to coordinate intestinal stem cell (ISC) maintenance, differentiation, and proliferation in response to environmental factors (Lin et al. 2013). The α2 and α3 subunits displayed an expression spatial gradient in the crypt and were implicated as cell growth patterns and phenotype modulators required for the process of intestinal epithelial cell differentiation (Zhang et al. 2003). Integrins also interact with growth factor receptors and other factors to regulate cell proliferation. Integrins and growth factor receptors can regulate G1 phase cyclins and related kinases that determine the cell cycle via various cytoplasmic signaling pathways (Moreno-Layseca and Streuli 2013; Eberwein et al. 2015). There are many indications that not all integrin-mediated cell cycle signaling is the same. Most integrins activate FAK, extracellular regulated kinase (ERK), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and Rho family GTPases on rigid ECMs (Luo et al. 2013; Naci and Aoudjit 2014). However, integrin αvβ3 is selectively associated with enhanced signaling by RTK receptors. It can also activate several other pathways including calcium entry into cells (Schwartz and Denninghoff 1994), NF-ΚB (Scatena et al. 1998), and possibly some others. In addition, some integrins cannot induce similar effects despite their similar abilities at promoting cell adhesion and cytoskeletal organization. Integrins αvβ3, α5β1, and α1β1 interact with caveolin to stimulate Shc phosphorylation and possibly other factors to promote DNA synthesis (Wary et al. 1996). Integrins αvβ3 and α5β1 also activate PI3 K, which are phoaphatidylinositol lipids that modify enzymes implicated as mediators of integrin-mediated cytoskeletal changes and play an important role in cell migration (Cary et al. 1999).

Integrins in cell survival and migration

Cell migration is also vital to various biological phenomena. It is involved in not only normal but also pathological events. For example, cell migration is essential in homeostatic processes such as repairing injured tissues and body immune responses in adults (Steffensen et al. 2001). Cell adhesion receptors are essential for cell migration, and many belong to integrins (Liddington and Bankston 2000). A related report showed that integrin α4β7 had a high expression in mast leukocytes in mucosal inflammation, which promoted the migration of precursor cells to the intestinal tract. Meighan revealed that integrins expressions were up-regulated in migratory cells, and their activities were linked to cellular physiological differentiation (Meighan and Schwarzbauer 2008). During cell migration, integrins must have been recycled or synthesized. Cell migration involves the localized activation of Rac for the directed protrusion of the cellular membrane only at the leading edges through both the ILK- and FAK-mediated pathways. The intracellular pH and calcium fluxes by integrins also affect cell migration (Schwartz et al. 1989; Marks et al. 1991). Integrins also play a crucial role in cell survival and protect anchored cells against serum starvation-induced apoptosis. When epithelial and endothelial cell matrix attachment is disrupted, it induces cell apoptosis. Integrin-mediated cell survival is promoted by signaling through the PI3K-AKT, AKT, and ERK pathways (Naci and Aoudjit 2014). If cells are displaced or begin to migrate in an inappropriate environment, they will lose integrin-mediated survival signals (Gilcrease 2007). Signaling through AKT mediates cell survival in adherent epithelial cells by phosphorylating and sequestering BAD, which is a pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family protein (Cory and Adams 2002). The signaling through the PI3 K-AKT pathway results in the phosphorylation of Bax, which is also a pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family protein (Gilmore et al. 2000). Integrin-mediated signaling through the ERK pathway down-regulated the pro-apoptotic protein Bim (Reginato et al. 2003).

Conclusions and future prospects

Integrins have gradually become a research hotspot in cell biology, physiology, genetics, and pathology. Expression levels of integrins in cell membranes not only affect cell morphology, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and some macromolecular syntheses but also important in maintaining organization and structural integrity. According to the specific distribution and function of different integrin subunits, immense researchers have applied the unique structural and biological functions of integrins to study the prevention and treatment of human or animal diseases such as gastric cancer, liver cancer, and damaged tissues, et al. Additionally, integrins transmit bidirectional signaling to exert their biological functions, which plays an important role in cellular processes. However, many questions remain to be elucidated, such as what the exact regulatory mechanisms are and how to determine integrin-mediated cell proliferation, migration, or survival in different cell or tissue types. Therefore, a better understanding of integrin characteristics and influences on human or animal functioning protein may provide a theoretical basis for clarifying the molecular mechanism of metastasis and solving these problems. The study of integrin-mediated signal transduction will also be an important area of research in the future.
  98 in total

1.  The alpha2 and alpha3 integrins are required for morphologic differentiation of an intestinal epithelial cell line.

Authors:  Xihong Zhang; John W Cromwell; B Daniel Kunjummen; Douglas Yee; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  β7 integrin controls immunogenic and tolerogenic mucosal B cell responses.

Authors:  Angela Schippers; Annika Kochut; Oliver Pabst; Ursula Frischmann; Thomas Clahsen; Klaus Tenbrock; Werner Müller; Norbert Wagner
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 3.  How ILK and kindlins cooperate to orchestrate integrin signaling.

Authors:  Ralph T Böttcher; Anika Lange; Reinhard Fässler
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 8.382

4.  Molecular cloning of chick cardiac muscle tensin. Full-length cDNA sequence, expression, and characterization.

Authors:  S H Lo; Q An; S Bao; W K Wong; Y Liu; P A Janmey; J H Hartwig; L B Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-09-02       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Rack1, a receptor for activated protein kinase C, interacts with integrin beta subunit.

Authors:  J Liliental; D D Chang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-01-23       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Paxillin association in vitro with integrin cytoplasmic domain peptides.

Authors:  T Tanaka; R Yamaguchi; H Sabe; K Sekiguchi; J M Healy
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1996-12-09       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Integrin αv mediates contractility whereas integrin α4 regulates proliferation of human bladder smooth muscle cells via FAK pathway under physiological stretch.

Authors:  De-Yi Luo; Romel Wazir; Ye Tian; Xuan Yue; Tang-Qiang Wei; Kun-Jie Wang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Mechanisms of talin-dependent integrin signaling and crosstalk.

Authors:  Mitali Das; Sujay Ithychanda; Jun Qin; Edward F Plow
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-07-24

Review 9.  Integrin-based therapeutics: biological basis, clinical use and new drugs.

Authors:  Klaus Ley; Jesus Rivera-Nieves; William J Sandborn; Sanford Shattil
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  Full length talin stimulates integrin activation and axon regeneration.

Authors:  Chin Lik Tan; Jessica C F Kwok; Janosch P D Heller; Rongrong Zhao; Richard Eva; James W Fawcett
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.314

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative sodium MR imaging: A review of its evolving role in medicine.

Authors:  Keith R Thulborn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The Helicobacter pylori Autotransporter ImaA Tempers the Bacterium's Interaction with α5β1 Integrin.

Authors:  William E Sause; Daniela Keilberg; Soufiane Aboulhouda; Karen M Ottemann
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 3.  Tumor Cell Invadopodia: Invasive Protrusions that Orchestrate Metastasis.

Authors:  Robert J Eddy; Maxwell D Weidmann; Ved P Sharma; John S Condeelis
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 4.  Progress and Principle of Drug Nanocrystals for Tumor Targeted Delivery.

Authors:  Meng Bai; Mingshi Yang; Junbo Gong; Hui Xu; Zhenping Wei
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Differential gene expression analysis using RNA sequencing: retinal pigment epithelial cells after exposure to continuous-wave and subthreshold micropulse laser.

Authors:  Tomoyasu Shiraya; Fumiyuki Araki; Suguru Nakagawa; Takashi Ueta; Kiyohito Totsuka; Hitoshi Abe; Yasuyuki Naito; Taku Toyama; Koichiro Sugimoto; Satoshi Kato
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.211

6.  Antibody Arrays Identified Cycle-Dependent Plasma Biomarker Candidates of Peritoneal Endometriosis.

Authors:  Maja Pušić; Teja Klančič; Tamara Knific; Andrej Vogler; Ronny Schmidt; Christoph Schröder; Tea Lanišnik Rižner
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-24

Review 7.  Influence of treatments on cell adhesion molecules in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis: a review.

Authors:  Lorena Flor da Rosa Franchi Santos; Neide Tomimura Costa; Michael Maes; Andréa Name Colado Simão; Isaias Dichi
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Effect of the silica nanoparticle size on the osteoinduction of biomineralized silk-silica nanocomposites.

Authors:  Zaira Martín-Moldes; Diego López Barreiro; Markus J Buehler; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 9.  Platelet Integrins in Tumor Metastasis: Do They Represent a Therapeutic Target?

Authors:  Marion Lavergne; Emily Janus-Bell; Mathieu Schaff; Christian Gachet; Pierre H Mangin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Effects of a Potential Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus gasseri ATCC 33323 on Helicobacter pylori-Induced Inflammatory Response and Gene Expression in Coinfected Gastric Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Mahdieh Yarmohammadi; Abbas Yadegar; Maryam Tajabadi Ebrahimi; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.