Literature DB >> 27467219

Practical applications of rapid review methods in the development of Australian health policy.

Robyn Lambert1, Thomas D Vreugdenburg1, Nicholas Marlow1, N Ann Scott1, Lynda McGahan1, David Tivey1.   

Abstract

Rapid reviews (RRs) are a method of evidence synthesis that can provide robust evidence to support policy decisions in a timely manner. Herein we describe the methods used to conduct RRs and present an illustrative case study to describe how RRs can be used to inform contemporary Australian health policy. The aim of the present study was to explore several important aspects of how RRs can inform decision makers. RRs are conducted within limited time frames of as little as 4 weeks. Policy questions may focus on issues of efficacy, service delivery and service organisation rather than reimbursement of new services, which is better answered by a more comprehensive assessment. RRs use flexible and pragmatic methods, which aim to balance the objectivity and rigour required of the reviews within limited time frames. This flexibility allows for great variation across products with regard to length, depth of analysis and methods used. As a result, RRs can be specifically tailored to address targeted policy questions and are a useful tool in the development of Australian health policy.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27467219     DOI: 10.1071/AH16041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  4 in total

1.  Management of post-traumatic epilepsy: An evidence review over the last 5 years and future directions.

Authors:  Loretta Piccenna; Graeme Shears; Terence J O'Brien
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2017-03-17

2.  Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline.

Authors:  Marcus Tolentino Silva; Everton Nunes da Silva; Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers' experiences.

Authors:  Rhona M Mijumbi-Deve; Ismael Kawooya; Edward Kayongo; Rose Izizinga; Hadis Mamuye; Krystle Amog; Etienne V Langlois
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-30

4.  Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Iain J Marshall; Rachel Marshall; Byron C Wallace; Jon Brassey; James Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 6.437

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.