Literature DB >> 27466894

Cochlear Implants in Adults: Effects of Age and Duration of Deafness on Speech Recognition.

Jason A Beyea1, Kyle P McMullen, Michael S Harris, Derek M Houston, Jennifer M Martin, Virginia A Bolster, Oliver F Adunka, Aaron C Moberly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Unexplained outcome variability exists among adults with cochlear implants (CIs). Two significant predictors are age and duration of deafness, with older patients and those with longer durations of deafness generally demonstrating poorer speech recognition. However, these factors are often highly correlated. Thus, it is unclear whether poorer outcomes should be attributed primarily to age-related declines or to the experience of auditory deprivation. Our aim was to examine the effects of aging and duration of hearing loss on outcomes for postlingually deaf adults with CIs. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of adults who received CIs from 1983 to 2014.
SETTING: Tertiary adult CI program. PATIENTS: Sixty-four adult patients with postlingual hearing loss beginning after age 12 years, full electrode insertion, normal cochlear anatomy, and availability of postoperative outcome measures. INTERVENTION: Cochlear implantation with 12 months or greater of device use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative pure-tone averages (0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz) and recognition of words in sentences (Hearing in Noise Test and AzBio).
RESULTS: Age at postoperative testing had a negative partial correlation with AzBio scores, when controlling for duration of deafness, whereas duration of deafness had a positive partial correlation with AzBio scores, when controlling for age. No other effects were identified.
CONCLUSION: Older age at testing was associated with poorer recognition of words in difficult sentences, suggesting that cognitive aging may negatively impact CI outcomes. Further studies are needed to examine how a long duration of auditory deprivation affects CI outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27466894     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  20 in total

1.  How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Kara J Vasil; Taylor L Wucinich; Natalie Safdar; Lauren Boyce; Christina Roup; Rachael Frush Holt; Oliver F Adunka; Irina Castellanos; Valeriy Shafiro; Derek M Houston; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Effects of electrode deactivation on speech recognition in multichannel cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2017-08-10

3.  Insertion Depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Comparative Study of 28- and 31.5-mm Lateral Wall Arrays.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Matthew M Dedmon; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Erin P Walter; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Cochlear implantation in the elderly: outcomes, long-term evolution, and predictive factors.

Authors:  Leire Garcia-Iza; Zuriñe Martinez; Ane Ugarte; Mercedes Fernandez; Xabier Altuna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  "Product" Versus "Process" Measures in Assessing Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Irina Castellanos; Kara J Vasil; Oliver F Adunka; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Prediction of the Functional Status of the Cochlear Nerve in Individual Cochlear Implant Users Using Machine Learning and Electrophysiological Measures.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Lei Xu; Xiuhua Chao; William J Riggs; Angela Pellittieri; Chloe Vaughan; Xia Ning; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Association of Patient-Related Factors With Adult Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elise E Zhao; James R Dornhoffer; Catherine Loftus; Shaun A Nguyen; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  Role of Preoperative Patient Expectations in Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Priyanka Reddy; Mark S Costello; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  White Matter Lesions as Possible Predictors of Audiological Performance in Adults after Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Steffen Knopke; Hans-Christian Bauknecht; Stefan Gräbel; Sophia Marie Häußler; Agnieszka J Szczepek; Heidi Olze
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.