Steven R Messé1, Gary Gronseth1, David M Kent1, Jorge R Kizer1, Shunichi Homma1, Lee Rosterman1, Scott E Kasner1. 1. From the Department of Neurology (S.R.M., S.E.K.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (G.G., L.R.), University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City; Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (D.M.K.), Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Epidemiology and Population Health (J.R.K.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx; and Division of Cardiology (S.H.), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology guideline for patients with stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO) by addressing whether (1) percutaneous closure of PFO is superior to medical therapy alone and (2) anticoagulation is superior to antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature and structured formulation of recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous PFO closure with the STARFlex device possibly does not provide a benefit in preventing stroke vs medical therapy alone (risk difference [RD] 0.13%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.2% to 2.0%). Percutaneous PFO closure with the AMPLATZER PFO Occluder possibly decreases the risk of recurrent stroke (RD -1.68%, 95% CI -3.18% to -0.19%), possibly increases the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (RD 1.64%, 95% CI 0.07%-3.2%), and is highly likely to be associated with a procedural complication risk of 3.4% (95% CI 2.3%-5%). There is insufficient evidence to determine the efficacy of anticoagulation compared with antiplatelet therapy in preventing recurrent stroke (RD 2%, 95% CI -21% to 25%). RECOMMENDATIONS: Clinicians should not routinely offer percutaneous PFO closure to patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke outside of a research setting (Level R). In rare circumstances, such as recurrent strokes despite adequate medical therapy with no other mechanism identified, clinicians may offer the AMPLATZER PFO Occluder if it is available (Level C). In the absence of another indication for anticoagulation, clinicians may routinely offer antiplatelet medications instead of anticoagulation to patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO (Level C).
OBJECTIVE: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology guideline for patients with stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO) by addressing whether (1) percutaneous closure of PFO is superior to medical therapy alone and (2) anticoagulation is superior to antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature and structured formulation of recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous PFO closure with the STARFlex device possibly does not provide a benefit in preventing stroke vs medical therapy alone (risk difference [RD] 0.13%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.2% to 2.0%). Percutaneous PFO closure with the AMPLATZER PFO Occluder possibly decreases the risk of recurrent stroke (RD -1.68%, 95% CI -3.18% to -0.19%), possibly increases the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (RD 1.64%, 95% CI 0.07%-3.2%), and is highly likely to be associated with a procedural complication risk of 3.4% (95% CI 2.3%-5%). There is insufficient evidence to determine the efficacy of anticoagulation compared with antiplatelet therapy in preventing recurrent stroke (RD 2%, 95% CI -21% to 25%). RECOMMENDATIONS: Clinicians should not routinely offer percutaneous PFO closure to patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke outside of a research setting (Level R). In rare circumstances, such as recurrent strokes despite adequate medical therapy with no other mechanism identified, clinicians may offer the AMPLATZER PFO Occluder if it is available (Level C). In the absence of another indication for anticoagulation, clinicians may routinely offer antiplatelet medications instead of anticoagulation to patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO (Level C).
Authors: David M Kent; Issa J Dahabreh; Robin Ruthazer; Anthony J Furlan; Mark Reisman; John D Carroll; Jeffrey L Saver; Richard W Smalling; Peter Jüni; Heinrich P Mattle; Bernhard Meier; David E Thaler Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-04-26
Authors: J P Mohr; J L Thompson; R M Lazar; B Levin; R L Sacco; K L Furie; J P Kistler; G W Albers; L C Pettigrew; H P Adams; C M Jackson; P Pullicino Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anthony J Furlan; Mark Reisman; Joseph Massaro; Laura Mauri; Harold Adams; Gregory W Albers; Robert Felberg; Howard Herrmann; Saibal Kar; Michael Landzberg; Albert Raizner; Lawrence Wechsler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John D Carroll; Jeffrey L Saver; David E Thaler; Richard W Smalling; Scott Berry; Lee A MacDonald; David S Marks; David L Tirschwell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David M Kent; Robin Ruthazer; Christian Weimar; Jean-Louis Mas; Joaquín Serena; Shunichi Homma; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Marco R Di Tullio; Jennifer S Lutz; Mitchell S V Elkind; John Griffith; Cheryl Jaigobin; Heinrich P Mattle; Patrik Michel; Marie-Louise Mono; Krassen Nedeltchev; Federica Papetti; David E Thaler Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 9.910