| Literature DB >> 27466240 |
R Ausavarungnirun1, S Wisetsin2, N Rongkiettechakorn1, S Chaichalermsak3, U Udompol4, M Rattanasompattikul1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown an association between oral diseases and chronic kidney disease (CKD), and regular oral care may be an important strategy for reducing the burden of CKD. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the association between dental and periodontal diseases in Thai patients with various stages of CKD.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; Complications of chronic kidney disease; Dental disease; Hypoalbuminemia; Periodontal disease
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27466240 PMCID: PMC4964184 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011836
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Demographic, clinical and laboratory values in 129 patients with CKD and according to the differences in group of CKD
| Group | Age (years) | eGFR (mL/min/ 1.73 m2) | BUN (mg/dL) | Creatinine (mg/dL) | FBS (mg/dL) | HbA1C (%) | CHOL (mg/dL) | LDL (mg/dL) | HDL (mg/dL) | TG (mg/dL) | Uric acid (mg/dL) | ALB (g/dL) | Hct (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (N=46) | Mean | 60 | 74.61 | 16 | 1.04 | 111 | 6.5 | 177 | 113 | 48 | 138 | 7.2 | 4.4 | 42 |
| SD | 10 | 8.75 | 4 | 0.15 | 30 | 1.5 | 41 | 39 | 10 | 41.9 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 4 | |
| Group 2 (N=48) | Mean | 66 | 48.65 | 23 | 1.50 | 114 | 6.6 | 172 | 103 | 53 | 134 | 7 | 4.3 | 39 |
| SD | 9 | 7.56 | 7 | 0.44 | 36 | 1.0 | 33 | 26 | 22 | 49 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 5 | |
| Group 3 (N=35) | Mean | 56 | 13.11 | 58 | 7.56 | 115 | 7.4 | 186 | 118 | 50 | 120 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 32 |
| SD | 12 | 9.80 | 23 | 5.16 | 32 | 1.6 | 56 | 50 | 14 | 43 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 4 | |
| p Value 3 group | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.85 | 0.05 | 0.39 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.27 | 0.81 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Group 2+3 (N=83) | Mean | 62 | 33.66 | 38 | 4.05 | 115 | 6.9 | 176 | 108 | 52 | 129 | 6.9 | 4.2 | 36 |
| SD | 11 | 19.6 | 24 | 4.49 | 34 | 1.3 | 42 | 36 | 20 | 47 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 5 | |
| p Value group 1 vs 2+3 | 0.46 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.58 | 0.19 | 0.91 | 0.48 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.52 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Total | Mean | 61 | 48.26 | 31 | 2.98 | 113 | 6.8 | 177 | 110 | 50 | 133 | 7 | 4.2 | 38 |
| SD | 11 | 25.71 | 23 | 3.88 | 33 | 1.4 | 42 | 37 | 17 | 45 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 6 | |
Group 1, eGFR=60–90 mL/min/1.73 m2; group 2, eGFR=30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2; group 3, eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
ALB, albumin; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CHOL, cholesterol; CKD, chronic kidney disease; FBS, fasting blood sugar; Hct, haematocrit; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride.
Figure 1Correlation between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; mL/min/1.73 m2) and levels of serum albumin (g/dL).
Compare DMF index between group in 129 CKD patients and according to the differences group of (Group 1: eGFR=60–90 mL/min/1.73 m2; Group 2: eGFR=30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2; Group 3: eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2)
| Index | Group 3 and 1 (control) | Group 2 and 1 (control) | Group 2+3 and 1 (control) | Group 1, 2 and 3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 3 | Group 1 | p Value* | Group 2 | Group 1 | p Value* | Group 2+3 | Group1 | p Value* | p Value† | |
| Decay | 2 (0, 5) | 3 (1, 5) | 0.15 | 3.5 (1, 6.5) | 3 (1, 5) | 0.84 | 3 (0, 6) | 3 (1, 5) | 0.5 | 0.24 |
| Missing | 10 (4, 19) | 8 (5, 13) | 0.75 | 13 (8, 17) | 8 (5, 13) | 0.01 | 12 (6, 19) | 8 (5, 13) | 0.046 | 0.05 |
| Filling | 0 (0, 3) | 2.5 (0, 5) | 0.05 | 1 (0, 4) | 2.5 (0, 5) | 0.33 | 1 (0, 4) | 2.5 (0, 5) | 0.26 | 0.13 |
| DMFT Index | 18 (10, 26) | 17.5 (12, 23) | 0.85 | 21 (15.5, 26.5) | 17.5 (12, 23) | 0.045 | 20 (13, 26) | 17.5 (12, 23) | 0.33 | 0.08 |
| Remaining teeth | 14 (6, 22) | 14.5 (9, 20) | 0.83 | 11 (5.5, 16.5) | 14.5 (9, 20) | 0.046 | 12 (6, 19) | 14.5 (9, 20) | 0.347 | 0.08 |
Values are median (25th percentile, 75th percentile).
*Mann-Whitney test.
†Kruskal-Wallis test.
CKD, chronic kidney disease; DMFT, Decayed, Missing or Filled Teeth.
Periodontaldiseases between group in 129 patients with CKD and according to the differences in group of CKD
| Index | Group 3 and 1 (control) | Group 2 and 1 (control) | Group 2+3 and 1 | Group 1, 2 and 3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 3 (N=35) | Group 1 (N=46) | p Value* | Group 2 (N=48) | Group 1 (N=46) | p Value* | Group 2+3 (N=83) | Group 1 (N=46) | p Value | p Value† | |
| Gingivitis | 10 (29%) | 17 (37%) | 0.43 | 20 (42%) | 17 (37%) | 0.64 | 30 (36%) | 17 (37%) | 0.93 | 0.47 |
| Periodontitis | 25 (71%) | 29 (63%) | 0.43 | 28 (58%) | 29 (63%) | 0.64 | 53 (64%) | 29 (63%) | 0.93 | 0.47 |
| Moderate periodontitis | 17 (49%) | 25 (54%) | 0.61 | 16 (33%) | 25 (54%) | 0.04 | 33 (40%) | 25 (54%) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Severe periodontitis | 8 (23%) | 4 (9%) | 0.08 | 12 (25%) | 4 (9%) | 0.036 | 20 (24%) | 4 (9%) | 0.03 | 0.11 |
Group 1, eGFR=60–90 mL/min/1.73 m2; group 2, eGFR=30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2; group 3, eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
The periodontal status was assessed using the CPI system. Periodontal health was transformed from the CPI score to fair (CPI score of 1, 2 or 5), moderate (CPI score of 3) or severe (CPI score of 4) periodontal status. Fair periodontal status was clinically diagnosed as gingivitis, while moderate and severe periodontal statuses were clinically diagnosed as periodontitis.
*χ2 test.
†Kruskal-Wallis test.
CKD, chronic kidney disease; CPI, Community Periodontal Index.
Figure 2Three-dimensional model showing the association between mean serum albumin level and periodontal status among the three groups of chronic kidney disease.
Figure 3Forest plots of various factors that might contribute to hypoalbuminaemia.