Literature DB >> 27465897

Fertility Preservation Is Safe for Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors.

Eveline Vancraeynest1, Philippe Moerman, Karin Leunen, Frédéric Amant, Patrick Neven, Ignace Vergote.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the overall survival (OS) and progression-free interval and the influence of fertility-preserving surgery (FPS) versus radical surgery (RS) in patients with serous borderline ovarian tumor (BOT).
METHODS: Clinical parameters of patients with serous BOT treated between 1993 and 2013 in one institution were retrospectively investigated. All tumors were examined by one pathologist with experience in gynecological pathology.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients with serous BOT (inclusive 16 microinvasive) were analyzed (45% were ≤40 years), with a median follow-up of 6 years. Thirty-two percent (42/132) of the patients received FPS; 14% (18/132) relapsed (invasive or borderline). The 5-year progression-free survival was 89%. The risk of recurrence was higher in patients 40 years or younger (P = 0.019), after FPS (P = 0.002), in patients with a higher International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (P = 0.016), for bilateral BOT (P = 0.0132), and for the micropapillary variant (P = 0.067). The OS at 5 years was 97%. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between FPS and RS [all (6 of 90) patients, except for 1, with RS died]. One patient died of relapsed BOT. Among the recurrences, low-grade invasive carcinoma was diagnosed in 4 patients. Three of these 4 patients were originally operated radically, 2 had a micropapillary variant FIGO stage III, and 1 had a papillary pattern FIGO stage II with microinvasion; all 3 had noninvasive implants and are alive. One patient with a micropapillary variant, FIGO stage IIIC with microinvasion and invasive implants, received FPS and died of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of recurrence is higher after FPS compared with RS; however, no influence on OS was observed. This was because most of the patients relapsed as BOT. Fertility preservation is justified in young patients with serous borderline tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27465897     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

1.  Age-dependent difference in impact of fertility preserving surgery on disease-specific survival in women with stage I borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Haiyan Sun; Xi Chen; Tao Zhu; Nanfang Liu; Aijun Yu; Shihua Wang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 2.  The challenging management of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) in women of childbearing age.

Authors:  Luigi Della Corte; Antonio Mercorio; Paolo Serafino; Francesco Viciglione; Mario Palumbo; Maria Chiara De Angelis; Maria Borgo; Cira Buonfantino; Marina Tesorone; Giuseppe Bifulco; Pierluigi Giampaolino
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-23

3.  Management of borderline ovarian tumors: A tertiary referral center experience in Egypt.

Authors:  Khaled Gaballa; Mohamed Abdelkhalek; Adel Fathi; Basel Refky; Khaled Belal; Moustafa Elaraby; Mohammad Zuhdy
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-02

4.  Second fertility-sparing surgery and fertility-outcomes in patients with recurrent borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Lifei Wang; Qian Zhong; Qin Tang; Hongjing Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 5.  Serous borderline ovarian tumours: an extensive review on MR imaging features.

Authors:  Hilal Sahin; Asli Irmak Akdogan; Janette Smith; Jeries Paolo Zawaideh; Helen Addley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.