Literature DB >> 27465806

Constructing representations of spatial location from briefly presented displays.

Glenn Gunzelmann1, Don R Lyon2.   

Abstract

Spatial memory and reasoning rely heavily on allocentric (often map-like) representations of spatial knowledge. While research has documented many ways in which spatial information can be represented in allocentric form, less is known about how such representations are constructed. For example: Are the very early, pre-attentive parts of the process hard-wired, or can they be altered by experience? We addressed this issue by presenting sub-saccadic (53 ms) masked stimuli consisting of a target among one to three reference features. We then shifted the location of the feature array, and asked participants to identify the target's new relative location. Experience altered feature processing even when the display duration was too short to allow attention re-allocation. The results demonstrate the importance of early perceptual processes in the creation of representations of spatial location, and the malleability of those processes based on experience and expectations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frame of reference; Learning; Spatial attention; Spatial cognition; Spatial encoding

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27465806     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-016-0775-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  23 in total

1.  Layout geometry in the selection of intrinsic frames of reference from multiple viewpoints.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Mintao Zhao; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Spatial cognition and the brain.

Authors:  Neil Burgess
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries.

Authors:  Christian F Doeller; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons.

Authors:  D Zipser; R A Andersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Location matters: why target location impacts performance in orientation tasks.

Authors:  Glenn Gunzelmann; John R Anderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

7.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; J Dostrovsky
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Distortions in judged spatial relations.

Authors:  A Stevens; P Coupe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Location memory for dots in polygons versus cities in regions: evaluating the category adjustment model.

Authors:  Alinda Friedman; Daniel R Montello; Heather Burte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.