| Literature DB >> 27465508 |
Adhra Al-Mawali1,2, David Gillis3, Ian Lewis3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal disorder presenting with accumulation of proliferating undifferentiated blasts. Xenograft transplantation studies have demonstrated a rare population of leukemia-initiating cells called leukemic stem cells (LSCs) capable of propagating leukemia that are enriched in the CD34+/CD38- fraction. LSCs are quiescent, resistant to chemotherapy and likely responsible for relapse and therefore represent an ideal target for effective therapy. LSCs are reported to overexpress the alpha subunit of the IL-3 receptor (CD123) compared to normal CD34+/CD38- hematopoietic stem cells. It has not been demonstrated whether CD123-positive (CD34+/CD38-) subpopulation is enriched for any clonal markers of AML or any LSC properties. The aims of this study were to investigate whether FMS-like tyrosine kinase (FLT3)/internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations are present at LSC level and whether FLT3/ITD mutation is confined to LSC as defined by CD34+/CD38-/CD123+ and not CD34+/CD38-/CD123-.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; CD34+/CD38−/CD123+; FLT3/ITD; Flow cytometry; Leukemic stem cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27465508 PMCID: PMC4964068 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-016-0292-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hematol Oncol ISSN: 1756-8722 Impact factor: 17.388
Clinical characteristics of AML patients according to FLT3/ITD status
| Patient characteristics | AML pos for FLT3/ITD | AML neg for FLT3/ITD |
|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 12 | 27 |
| Male/female | 8/4 | 17/10 |
| Age at diagnosis, median, (range) | 62 (23–73) | 69 (23–88) |
| WBC count at diagnosis × 109/L, median (range) | 6.6 (0.9–179) | 6.3 (0.7–227) |
| BM blasts % by morphology, median (range) | 72 (26–85) | 35 (20–87) |
| AML de novo/secondary | 9 (75)/3 (25) | 23 (85)/4 (15) |
| FAB classification, | ||
| Mo | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| M1 | 6 (50) | 2 (7) |
| M2 | 1 (8) | 10 (37) |
| M3 | 2 (17) | 2 (7) |
| M4 | 1 (8) | 3 (11) |
| M5 | 1 (8) | 4 (15) |
| M6 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| M7 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Not classified | 1 (8) | 6 (22) |
| Cytogenetic risk group, | ||
|
| 2 (17) | 4 (15) |
| Intermediate | 10 (83) | 13 (48) |
| Poor | 0 (0) | 9 (33) |
| Insufficient sample | 0 (0) | 1 (4) |
| Induction therapy response, | ||
| CR | 7 (70) | 15 (88) |
| Failure | 3 (30) | 2 (12) |
Patient characteristics
| Patient characteristics | Total (%) |
|---|---|
| No. of patients | 34 |
| Male/female | 24/10 |
| Age at diagnosis, mean (range) | 63 (23–86) |
| % blasts at diagnosis (morphology), mean (range) | 41.5 (20–96) |
| % blasts at diagnosis (flow), mean (range) | 42.5 (9–86) |
| WBC count at diagnosis, 109/L, median (range) | 4.5 (0.71–179) |
| De novo/secondary AML | 27 (79)/7 (21) |
| FAB classification, | |
| M0 | 0 (0) |
| M1 | 8 (24) |
| M2 | 10 (29) |
| M3 | 1 (3) |
| M4 | 2 (6) |
| M5 | 4 (12) |
| M6 | 1 (3) |
| M7 | 0 (0) |
| Not classified | 8 (24) |
| Cytogenetic risk group, | |
| Favorable | 2 (6) |
| Intermediate | 19 (56) |
| Poor | 12 (35) |
| No metaphases | 1 (3) |
| FLT3/ITD, | |
| Present | 10 (29) |
| Absent | 15 (44) |
| Not analyzed | 9 (26) |
| CD123, | |
| Present | 32 (94 %) |
| Absent | 2 (6 %) |
Specification of monoclonal antibodies
| Antibody | Clone | Isotype | Conjugate | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD13 | L138 | IgG1 | PE | Beckton Dickinson |
| CD33 | P67.6 | IgG1 | PE | Beckton Dickinson |
| CD33 | P67.6 | IgG1 | FITC | Beckton Dickinson |
| CD34 | 8G12 | IgG1 | FITC | Beckton Dickinson |
| CD34 | 581 | IgG1 | PC5 | ImmunoTech |
| CD38 | LS198-4-3 | IgG1 | PE | Beckman Coulter |
| CD45 | Immu19.2 | IgG1 | PC5 | ImmunoTech |
| CD45 | J33 | IgG1 | ECD | ImmunoTech |
| CD117 | 104D2D1 | IgG1 | PE | ImmunoTech |
| CD117 | 104D2D1 | IgG1 | PC7 | Beckman Coulter |
| CD123 | 9F5 | IgG1 | PE | Beckton Dickinson |
| HLA-DR | L243 | IgG2a | FITC | BioDesign |
| CD38 | T16 | IgG1 | FITC | Beckman Coulter |
Fig. 2Gating strategy in newly diagnosed AML to identify CD34+/CD38−/CD123+ cells
Fig. 3Gating strategy in normal BM to identify CD34+/CD38−/CD123+ cells
Fig. 1Optimization of PCR technique using FLT3/ITD-positive and FLT3/ITD-negative patient. a Using three different DNA concentrations 5, 2.5, and 1.25 ng/μl in FLT3/ITD-positive AML patient. Lane 1 FLT3/ITD detected with 50 ng DNA added, lane 2 FLT3/ITD detected with 25 ng DNA added, lane 3 FLT3/ITD detected with 12.5 ng DNA added, lane 4 no DNA added, and M pUC19 molecular marker. The solid line points to FLT3/ITD bp inserted while the dotted arrow points to the WT FLT3 gene. b Using DNA obtained from different number of cells (2 × 106, 150, 1606 cells in duplicates) on WT FLT3 AML patient based on the number of cells obtained from the first sorted sample (sample no.1 in Table 4). Lanes 1 and 2 (duplicate) DNA obtained from 2 × 106 cells, FLT3 WT detected; lanes 3 and 4 (duplicate) DNA obtained from 150 cells, FLT3 WT detected; lanes 5 and 6 (duplicate) DNA obtained from 1606 cells, FLT3 WT detected; lane 7, no DNA, so the PCR was specific; lanes 8 and 9 are the negative and positive controls and M was pUC19 marker. c DNA fragments (bp) of the molecular marker pUC19
Summary of results from sorting and immunomagnetic cell selection MACS
| Sample no. | Age | Total unsorted cells | % CD34 unsorted cells | % CD123 unsorted cells | Total CD34+/CD38−/CD123+ cells from the sorter | Total CD34+/CD38−/CD123− cells from the sorter | WBC count ×109/L | FAB-subtype | Cytogenetics | % blast % diagnosis | Sequencing FLT3/ITD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 | 10 × 106 | 96 | 86 | 150 | 1606 | 5.6 | M1 | Normal | 80 | ND |
| 2 | 60 | 18 × 106 | 89 | 99 | 76,000 | 418 | 4.5 | M1 | Normal | 62 | ND |
| 3 | 69 | 12 × 106 | 91 | 86 | 12,674 | 148,396 | 14.4 | M2 | Normal | 22 | 78 bp |
| 4 | 53 | 27 × 106 | 73a | 93 | 1839 | 16 | 179 | M5a | Normal | 82 | 33 bp |
| 5 | 62 | 30 × 106 | 10 | 64 | 559 | 164 | 145 | M4 | Normal | 40 | ND |
| 6 | 65 | 17 × 106 | 15 | 99 | 300,000 | 69 | 6.11 | M2 | Normal | 73 | ND |
| 7 | 72 | 40 × 106 | 79 | 68 | 640 | 3602 | 0.92 | M1 | Normal | 26 | ND |
Total unsorted cells represents the starting sample size, whereas total CD34+CD38−CD123+ and CD34+CD38−CD123− cells refers to the total number of CD34+/CD38−/CD123+/− cells obtained from a given sample after sorting. Genomic DNA was sequenced for FLT3/ITD for sample nos. 3 and 4. ND indicates not done
aAfter CD34+ selection by MACS, the total yield of CD34+ = 2.4 × 10−5 cells
Fig. 4FLT3/ITD mutations in the BM cells of 7 AML patients. a CD34+/CD38−/CD123+ and CD34+/CD38−/CD123− cells from different patient samples were isolated by sorting (sorting results displayed in Table 4). For each of the seven samples, genomic DNA was isolated from the (1) CD34+/CD38−/CD123−, (2) CD34+/CD38−/CD123+ cells, and (3) unsorted cells at diagnosis (a vertical line was inserted to indicate that diagnosis samples were done on separate gels). b The sequences of the FLT3/ITD mutations from the two samples (patients 3 and 4) are shown. These sequences, obtained from the DNA of CD34+/CD38−/CD123+ cells, matched the sequences of the mutations present in the pre-sorted samples. bp indicates base pair. Boldface sequence refers to the inserted, duplicated material