Literature DB >> 27465389

Are all children with visual impairment known to the eye clinic?

Rachel F Pilling1, Louise Outhwaite1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is a growing body of evidence that children with special needs are more likely to have visual problems, be that visual impairment, visual processing problems or refractive error. While there is widespread provision of vision screening in mainstream schools, patchy provision exists in special schools. The aim of the study was to determine the unmet need and undiagnosed visual problems of children attending primary special schools in Bradford, England.
METHODS: Children attending special schools who were not currently under the care of the hospital eye service were identified. Assessments of visual function and refractive error were undertaken on site at the schools by an experienced orthoptist and/or paediatric ophthalmologist.
RESULTS: A total of 157 children were identified as eligible for the study, with a mean age of 7.8 years (range 4-12 years). Of these, 33% of children were found to have visual impairment, as defined by WHO and six children were eligible for severe sight impairment certification. DISCUSSION: The study demonstrates significant unmet need or undiagnosed visual impairment in a high-risk population. It also highlights the poor uptake of hospital eye care for children identified with significant visual needs and suggests the importance of providing in-school assessment and support, including refractive correction, to fully realise the benefits of a visual assessment programme. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child health (paediatrics); Diagnostic tests/Investigation; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27465389     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical assessment, investigation, diagnosis and initial management of cerebral visual impairment: a consensus practice guide.

Authors:  Rachel Fiona Pilling; Louise Allen; Richard Bowman; John Ravenscroft; Kathryn J Saunders; Cathy Williams
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 4.456

2.  Findings from an opt-in eye examination service in English special schools. Is vision screening effective for this population?

Authors:  Lisa A Donaldson; Marek Karas; Donna O'Brien; J Margaret Woodhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pinhole does not increase screening accuracy of detecting decreased best corrected visual acuity in schoolchildren.

Authors:  Weiwei Chen; Jing Fu; Ali Sun; Lei Li; Yunyun Sun; Zhaojun Meng
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Is there evidence that the yearly numbers of children newly certified with sight impairment in England and Wales has increased between 1999/2000 and 2014/2015? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catey Bunce; Antra Zekite; Richard Wormald; Richard Bowman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Referral thresholds for an integrated learning disability eye care pathway: a consensus approach.

Authors:  Rachel F Pilling; Lisa Donaldson; Marek Karas; R Jane Leitch; Howard Bunting; Ravi Naru; Gordon Ilett
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.775

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.