Literature DB >> 27465227

Procedural Competence Among Faculty in Academic Health Centers: Challenges and Future Directions.

Alon Vaisman1, Peter Cram.   

Abstract

Increasingly, faculty are taking on more direct responsibilities in patient care because of reductions in resident work hours, increasing admissions, and an endless push for efficiency. Furthermore, the rise of different career tracks in academia (i.e., patient care, research, education, or administration) and a drive for efficiency and subspecialization have placed additional strains on academic health centers. Combined, these factors have led to faculty increasingly being placed in the position of supervising bedside procedures that they may have not performed in years or with tools they have never trained with at all. Despite these challenges, procedural retraining for faculty remains nonstandardized across most academic health centers. The resulting lack of procedural competence among faculty creates a number of challenges for the different parties involved.In this Perspective, the authors discuss the nature of the current problem of faculty procedural competence and the challenges it poses for faculty and academic health centers, medicolegal ramifications, and the challenges it poses to the faculty-trainee relationship. The authors then suggest several strategies to delineate and resolve this problem. To delineate the problem, they suggest single-center surveys to address the current paucity of data. To resolve the problem, they suggest the consideration of some modest, low-cost interventions such as having backup systems in place for procedure supervision (e.g., procedural service teams or interventional radiologists) and providing faculty with opportunities to retrain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27465227      PMCID: PMC5191975          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  21 in total

1.  Confidence of academic general internists and family physicians to teach ambulatory procedures.

Authors:  G C Wickstrom; D K Kelley; T C Keyserling; M M Kolar; J G Dixon; S X Xie; C L Lewis; B A Bognar; C T DuPre; D R Coxe; J Hayden; M V Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  A systematic review: the effect of clinical supervision on patient and residency education outcomes.

Authors:  Jeanne M Farnan; Lindsey A Petty; Emily Georgitis; Shannon Martin; Emily Chiu; Meryl Prochaska; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Simulation training and its effect on long-term resident performance in central venous catheterization.

Authors:  C Christopher Smith; Grace C Huang; Lori R Newman; Peter F Clardy; David Feller-Kopman; Michael Cho; Trustin Ennacheril; Richard M Schwartzstein
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.929

4.  Factors Associated with Inpatient Thoracentesis Procedure Quality at University Hospitals.

Authors:  Sarah E Kozmic; Diane B Wayne; Joe Feinglass; Samuel F Hohmann; Jeffrey H Barsuk
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2016-01

Review 5.  Pneumothorax following thoracentesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Craig E Gordon; David Feller-Kopman; Ethan M Balk; Gerald W Smetana
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-22

Review 6.  Linking simulation-based educational assessments and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Brydges; Rose Hatala; Benjamin Zendejas; Patricia J Erwin; David A Cook
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Procedures performed by hospitalist and non-hospitalist general internists.

Authors:  Rajiv Thakkar; Scott M Wright; Patrick Alguire; Robert S Wigton; Romsai T Boonyasai
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Simulation-based assessment and retraining for the anesthesiologist seeking reentry to clinical practice: a case series.

Authors:  Samuel DeMaria; Stefan T Samuelson; Andrew D Schwartz; Alan J Sim; Adam I Levine
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  The impact of a medical procedure service on patient safety, procedure quality and resident training opportunities.

Authors:  Melissa H Tukey; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Supervising the supervisors--procedural training and supervision in internal medicine residency.

Authors:  Michelle Mourad; Jeffrey Kohlwes; Judith Maselli; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  3 in total

1.  Maintaining procedural skills for academic emergency medicine faculty: A needs assessment.

Authors:  Brian Clyne; Hannah Barber Doucet; Linda Brown; Andrew Musits; Elizabeth Jacobs; Christopher Merritt; Rory Merritt; Lauren Allister; Gianna Petrone; Nicholas Musisca; Jessica L Smith; Janette Baird; Michael J Mello
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-08-01

2.  See One, Do One, Forget One: Early Skill Decay After Paracentesis Training.

Authors:  Dana Sall; Eric J Warm; Benjamin Kinnear; Matthew Kelleher; Roman Jandarov; Jennifer O'Toole
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Just-in-time clinical video review improves successful placement of Sengstaken-Blakemore tube by emergency medicine resident physicians: A randomized control simulation-based study.

Authors:  James W Bonz; Joshua K Pope; Ambrose H Wong; Jessica M Ray; Leigh V Evans
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-02-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.