Literature DB >> 27465100

Quality of life in women of non-reproductive age with transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse: A cohort study.

Tanja Hüsch1, René Mager2, Erika Ober3, Ralf Bentler3, Kurt Ulm4, Axel Haferkamp2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transvaginal mesh repair has been discredited due to high complications rates in the past years. Therefore, we evaluated the quality of life (QoL) and complication rates after transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
METHODS: A total of 148 women who underwent TVM repair for symptomatic POP were retrospectively enrolled. Complication rates and functional outcomes were retrospectively assessed and validated, standardised questionnaires were used prospectively for evaluation of QoL. Univariate analysis by the chi(2)-test as well as a multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to predict mesh exposure using various variables as predictors.
RESULTS: Intraoperative complications with bowel or bladder injury appeared in 3.4%. Mesh exposure occurred in 2.7% whereas surgical revision was necessary only in 1.4%. No predictor for mesh exposure could be identified. Postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ III occurred in only 2.8%. An improvement of POP-symptoms was reported by 84.6% according the "patients' global impression of improvement" (PGI-I) and 88.2% women would repeat the surgery. The results of the "prolapse-quality of life"-questionnaire were comparable to asymptomatic women. Only 33% reported vaginal pain with a mean vaginal pain score of 0.6 according the international index of pain. Of sexually active women, 29% reported sexual impairments and mean score of sexual impairment was 1.52.
CONCLUSION: Low complication rates and a quality of life comparable to asymptomatic women following TVM repair could be achieved in our cohort. However, a high number of sexual impairments was identified although the impact of impairment was marginal.
Copyright © 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pelvic organ prolapse; Quality of life; Transvaginal mesh repair; Vaginal surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27465100     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  5 in total

1.  Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction with Six-Arm Mesh in Patients with Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A 1-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ying Zhao; Zhi-Jun Xia; Qing Hu; Mei-Ying Qin
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  The assessment of quality of life and satisfaction with life of patients before and after surgery of an isolated apical defect using synthetic materials.

Authors:  Maciej Zalewski; Gabriela Kołodyńska; Anna Mucha; Łukasz Bełza; Krzysztof Nowak; Waldemar Andrzejewski
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  The Impact of Frailty on Morbidity and Mortality following Open Emergent Colectomies.

Authors:  Dominick V Congiusta; Prashanth Palvannan; Aziz M Merchant
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Predictors of persistent stress urinary incontinence after transvaginal mesh repair.

Authors:  Shohei Kawaguchi; Kazutaka Narimoto; Satoko Urata; Masami Takeyama; Yoshifumi Kadono; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Single-Incision Mini-Sling for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Is it Actually Inferior to Transobturator Vaginal Tape and Tension-Free Vaginal Tape?

Authors:  Matej Keršič; Maruša Keršič; Tina Kunič; Simone Garzon; Antonio Simone Laganà; Matija Barbič; Adolf Lukanović; David Lukanović
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2020-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.