Manish Jain1,2, Arushi Jain3, Marek D Hyzy4, Graziella Werth1. 1. MIA Monash Radiology, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. 2. Monash Breast Screen, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. 3. Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. 4. MIA Casey Radiology, Casey Specialist Centre, Berwick, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Screening for breast cancer in high-risk women takes about 40 minutes to acquire an MRI scan and is time-intensive to report. There is recent interest in the performance of an abbreviated MRI protocol (FAST) in the screening setting. FAST scans have a reported negative predictive value of 99.8%. This study evaluates the false positive rates (FPR) and recall rates for FAST scans as compared to full diagnostic studies (FD). METHODS: A database of all screening breast MRI scans performed at our institution between 30 June 2013 and 1 July 2014 (n = 591) was created by one of the researchers, who did not subsequently analyse the MRI scans. The T1W and first post-contrast and subtracted images from each of these scans (FAST protocol) were assessed by experienced breast MRI radiologists, blinded to the final diagnosis. The findings were then compared with the FD result. RESULTS: The recall rates were 6.6% for FAST scans and 5.8% for FD scans. FPR rates were 4.7% and 3.9% respectively. There is no statistically significant difference in the recall rates or FPR of FAST scans in comparison with full diagnostic studies. CONCLUSIONS: Given the absence of statistically significant difference in the FPR and recall rates in comparison with FD, FAST scans can replace FD for screening of breast cancer.
INTRODUCTION: Screening for breast cancer in high-risk women takes about 40 minutes to acquire an MRI scan and is time-intensive to report. There is recent interest in the performance of an abbreviated MRI protocol (FAST) in the screening setting. FAST scans have a reported negative predictive value of 99.8%. This study evaluates the false positive rates (FPR) and recall rates for FAST scans as compared to full diagnostic studies (FD). METHODS: A database of all screening breast MRI scans performed at our institution between 30 June 2013 and 1 July 2014 (n = 591) was created by one of the researchers, who did not subsequently analyse the MRI scans. The T1W and first post-contrast and subtracted images from each of these scans (FAST protocol) were assessed by experienced breast MRI radiologists, blinded to the final diagnosis. The findings were then compared with the FD result. RESULTS: The recall rates were 6.6% for FAST scans and 5.8% for FD scans. FPR rates were 4.7% and 3.9% respectively. There is no statistically significant difference in the recall rates or FPR of FAST scans in comparison with full diagnostic studies. CONCLUSIONS: Given the absence of statistically significant difference in the FPR and recall rates in comparison with FD, FAST scans can replace FD for screening of breast cancer.
Authors: Eun Sil Kim; Nariya Cho; Soo Yeon Kim; Bo Ra Kwon; Ann Yi; Su Min Ha; Su Hyun Lee; Jung Min Chang; Woo Kyung Moon Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Lyn I Jones; Andrea Marshall; Premkumar Elangovan; Rebecca Geach; Sadie McKeown-Keegan; Sarah Vinnicombe; Sam A Harding; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Mark Halling-Brown; Christopher Foy; Elizabeth O'Flynn; Hesam Ghiasvand; Claire Hulme; Janet A Dunn Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2022-07-30 Impact factor: 8.408